Started By
Message

re: Rand Paul: Intelligence report leakers should be in jail

Posted on 1/11/17 at 6:23 pm to
Posted by teampick
Member since Jan 2015
2400 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 6:23 pm to
I was under the impression that Trump supporters enthusiastically endorsed the unfettered obtainment and release of any information that evidenced untoward or embarrassing deeds by public officials. Blackmail by its very nature implies that the victim has done something it does not wish made public. Just another example of the chickens coming home to roost. Own it Trumpkins.
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
45213 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 6:23 pm to
Yes
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
65697 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 6:25 pm to

You're stating John McCain (singularly IYO as he's the only name you gave) vets whistle blower files, all of them, from third party supplier sources such as Wikileaks. Yes?
Posted by Bunta
Member since Oct 2007
12236 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 6:26 pm to
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

and Paul: Intelligence report leakers should be in jail
He's right. Just wish the 28 shitheads who upvoted you felt the same way about Chelsea bitchass Manning and that fricking Edward Snowden.

Hypocrites.
Posted by ManBearTiger
BRLA
Member since Jun 2007
21837 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

Hold on, who confirms whistle blower sources? Want to go don this rabbit hole? I have a bit of time tonight...


Christ you're a pathetic moron.
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
45213 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

You're stating John McCain (singularly IYO as he's the only name you gave) vets whistle blower files, all of them, from third party supplier sources such as Wikileaks. Yes?


Correct, I do not understand what is so difficult
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
65697 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 6:29 pm to
Explain


ETA: Or not.
This post was edited on 1/11/17 at 6:37 pm
Posted by ManBearTiger
BRLA
Member since Jun 2007
21837 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 6:42 pm to
What's there to explain? Yesterday you were jizzing yourself over unverified allegations that are quickly being exposed as a pile of nothing and now you're trying to call into question the veracity of wikileaks's sources. You're just a standard issue moron flailing from your own confused panic.
This post was edited on 1/11/17 at 6:51 pm
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
65697 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 6:44 pm to



I knew you had nothing.

**there...
Posted by CaptChandler
Polis
Member since Sep 2016
2427 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

Just another example of the chickens coming home to roost.


Not even close. The thing is, these claims are unsubstantiated.

quote:

Own it Trumpkins.


They don't have to.
Posted by CaptChandler
Polis
Member since Sep 2016
2427 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

28 shitheads who upvoted you felt the same way about Chelsea bitchass Manning and that fricking Edward Snowden.

Hypocrites.



What a broad brush you paint with.
Posted by Old Hellen Yeller
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9415 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

But Assange should get a medal.


not bad
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

What a broad brush you paint with.


It's incredible what passes for an insult these days.
Posted by teampick
Member since Jan 2015
2400 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:00 pm to
Then there is nothing to blackmail and no reason to be concerned about the release of the dossier or the need for anyone to go to jail for its release.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

I was under the impression that Trump supporters enthusiastically endorsed the unfettered obtainment and release of any information that evidenced untoward or embarrassing deeds by public officials. Blackmail by its very nature implies that the victim has done something it does not wish made public. Just another example of the chickens coming home to roost. Own it Trumpkins.




Double down dipshit.

This isn't "information", it is lies>

God damn you frickers are idiots.

Just repeat the same shite over and over again.

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

like Rainman
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71540 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

It's incredible what passes for an insult these days.




They don't make them like they used to.
Posted by TigerJeff
the Emerald Coast
Member since Oct 2006
16356 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:17 pm to
"Leakers"... no pun intended? titter tee hee hee
Posted by bamafan1001
Member since Jun 2011
15783 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:21 pm to
Snowden was exposing wrongdoing by the US government. The IC leakers were actively trying to discredit a politician for political reasons.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112610 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:26 pm to
You seem like a normal red blooded guy on SECR, I'm curious to how you ended up being a femme leftist.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram