- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Obamacare passed in Supreme Court because it was considered a TAX
Posted on 1/5/17 at 4:18 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
Posted on 1/5/17 at 4:18 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
women in combat
I have zero problem with this.
I served 6 years and hated women in the military but only because they didn't have to live up to the same standards men do.
Those that can "man up" to the exact same standards should be eligible.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 4:25 pm to Loserman
quote:I like to believe that American men fight wars so our women and children are protected. We should not be sending them off to die.
women in combat
Posted on 1/5/17 at 4:35 pm to Loserman
quote:
It may be the worst decision in the History of the court because it is the first time in History that a tax was allowed to be levied on inactivity.
I guess in their mind breathing is an activity.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 4:41 pm to Wtodd
quote:
It passed bc Roberts legislated from the bench which the SCOTUS is not supposed to do
It was passed because someone threatened Roberts with something so intimidating that he reversed himself and sided with the government. Such was referenced in the Podesta emails, but what he was scared with was never revealed. I, for one, want to know what it took to effectively blackmail a Supreme Court Justice.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 4:46 pm to kingbob
As I recall, rumor was that it was something fishy in the way his kids were adopted.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 5:44 pm to AuburnTigers
Obama admin has repeatedly used a scheme called sue and settle. An outside group sues the EPA for a regulation they don't like and the admin declines to defend itself and settles.
Similar process could be used here - encourage someone to challenge the constitutionality of Obamacare and decline to defend the suit and the law gets overturned.
That's how dens play democracy.
Similar process could be used here - encourage someone to challenge the constitutionality of Obamacare and decline to defend the suit and the law gets overturned.
That's how dens play democracy.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 6:04 pm to Wtodd
quote:
It passed bc Roberts legislated from the bench which the SCOTUS is not supposed to do; Obama & crew argued it was a fine
not in front of the SCOTUS they didn't
Posted on 1/5/17 at 8:59 pm to gthog61
quote:
It passed bc Roberts legislated from the bench which the SCOTUS is not supposed to do; Obama & crew argued it was a fine
quote:
not in front of the SCOTUS they didn't
They absolutely did and did not at the same time.
Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. “Today you are arguing that the penalty is not a tax,” he told Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr., the administration’s lead advocate. “Tomorrow you are going to be back and you will be arguing that the penalty is a tax. Has the court ever held that something that is a tax for purposes of the taxing power under the Constitution is not a tax under the Anti-Injunction Act?”
Posted on 1/5/17 at 9:03 pm to CaptainBrannigan
quote:
Why? The precedent of the power to tax is set.
What is being taxed...the individual for simply existing??? Thats a stretch, i don't care who you are.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 9:05 pm to CaptainBrannigan
quote:
This tac is not meant to be a source of revenue,
The penalties go into the government coffers.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 9:12 pm to AuburnTigers
It passed because Obama blackmailed Roberts about the adoption of his children.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News