Started By
Message

re: Obama most corrupt President in?

Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:24 am to
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111609 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:24 am to
Gramps - quit posting your union newsletters.
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:24 am to
quote:

Gramps - quit posting your union newsletters.


I am sorry if the truth offends you.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
74275 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:28 am to
quote:

am sorry if the truth offends you


Its not the truth
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
35661 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:32 am to
quote:

Don't get me wrong, Obama is a true POS, but no more so than any of the other puppets before him hand-picked by the globalist Fascist establishment that has controlled this country for more than 100 years.



I don't really agree with that. The last president who tried to work for the American people was JFK. Look what it got him.
How does that disagree with what I posted?

JFK, like those before and after him, was hand-picked. He fricked up by going rogue, not unlike Saddam Hussein, or Ghaddafi, or Chavez, or Assad.....

And BTW, JFK wasn't the last President who tried to work for the American people. Reagan was too stupid to know he didn't wield the power. They just happened to "miss" with him.

Murika
Posted by tedmarkuson
texas
Member since Feb 2015
2592 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:33 am to
re: Note for non-liberal posters on this board: - Porker Face on 10/4/16 at 5:38 pm
HRC 55 TRUMP 39 3RD PARTY 6...

when the jug eared buffoon was elected there was 1 republican in arkansas' congressional delegation and not a single republican constitutional officer. now there's not a single democrat in the congressional delegation nor as a constitutional officer.

obama finally did for arkansas what the republican party could never do got rid of the dems and for that i'm thankful. i might even consider moving back when i retire. although i'm keeping my texas address because i will not pay that 7% income tax on every dollar over 34k.
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:34 am to
quote:

am sorry if the truth offends you

Its not the truth


What? That the housing bubble and the $900B TARP bailout is not on Bush 43?

That is the truth; sorry if you don't like it.

Bush signs bank bailout, Oct. 3, 2008

By ANDREW GLASS 10/03/13 05:10 AM EDT


On this day in 2008, President George W. Bush signed legislation that allowed the U.S. Treasury to put its proposed Troubled Asset Relief Program into effect. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson told Congress its implementation was required to stem a worldwide economic collapse. Bush acted within hours of its passage by the House.

Paulson initially wanted the government to buy toxic assets held by insolvent banks and then auction them off to private investors or companies. But he abandoned that approach on the advice of Gordon Brown, the British prime minister, who came to the White House for an international summit on the global credit crisis.


Formally called the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, the measure bailed out banks in the wake of the subprime mortgage debacle. It authorized the Treasury to spend as much as $700 billion in taxpayer funds to buy mortgage-backed securities and other distressed assets as a means of restoring confidence in badly shaken credit markets. Initially, a coalition of conservative free-market Republicans and liberal anti-Wall Street Democrats greeted Paulson’s proposal with skepticism. On Sept. 29, the House unexpectedly rejected the plan by a vote of 205-228, shaking the financial markets. Four days later, after some minor changes, the House voted 263–171 to pass the bill into law."


LINK

A world wide economic collapse brought down on us by Bush 43 policies.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
35661 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:37 am to
quote:

am sorry if the truth offends you

Its not the truth



What? That the housing bubble and the $900B TARP bailout is not on Bush 43?

Dude, American history only goes as far back as the Obama Administration.

Try to keep up with Poliboard mentality.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
74275 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:37 am to
Its not the truth. Sorry

Linking politico?
Posted by HeadLightBanDit
Hernando, MS
Member since Oct 2012
1409 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:47 am to
Nixon says hello.
Posted by Iowa Golfer
Heaven
Member since Dec 2013
10232 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:48 am to
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:58 am to
quote:

Its not the truth.

Sorry Linking politico?


I don't get people who say, "Oh that site is no good."

Are you saying this isn't correct: Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson told Congress its implementation was required to stem a worldwide economic collapse.


Is that not true?

Or this:

Formally called the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, the measure bailed out banks in the wake of the subprime mortgage debacle. It authorized the Treasury to spend as much as $700 billion in taxpayer funds to buy mortgage-backed securities and other distressed assets as a means of restoring confidence in badly shaken credit markets. Initially, a coalition of conservative free-market Republicans and liberal anti-Wall Street Democrats greeted Paulson’s proposal with skepticism. On Sept. 29, the House unexpectedly rejected the plan by a vote of 205-228, shaking the financial markets. Four days later, after some minor changes, the House voted 263–171 to pass the bill into law."

Is that not true?

Act like an adult.

Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
74275 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 9:02 am to
Just stop embarrassing yourself



quote:

Seeds of mortgage meltdown

The seeds of the mortgage meltdown were planted during Bill Clinton's presidency.
Under Clinton's Housing and Urban Development (HUD) secretary, Andrew Cuomo, Community Reinvestment Act regulators gave banks higher ratings for home loans made in "credit-deprived" areas. Banks were effectively rewarded for throwing out sound underwriting standards and writing loans to those who were at high risk of defaulting. If banks didn't comply with these rules, regulators reined in their ability to expand lending and deposits.


quote:

These new HUD rules lowered down payments from the traditional 20 percent to 3 percent by 1995 and zero down-payments by 2000. What's more, in the Clinton push to issue home loans to lower income borrowers, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac made a common practice to virtually end credit documentation, low credit scores were disregarded, and income and job history was also thrown aside. The phrase "subprime" became commonplace. What an understatement.




quote:

Next, the Clinton administration's rules ordered the taxpayer-backed Fannie and Freddie to expand their quotas of risky loans from 30 percent of portfolio to 50 percent as part of a big push to expand home ownership.
Fannie and Freddie were securitizing these home loans and offering 100 percent taxpayer guarantees of repayment. So now taxpayers were on the hook for these risky, low down-payment loans.


https://www.google.com/amp/www.cnbc.com/amp/2016/05/28/are-the-clintons-the-real-housing-crash-villains.html

Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 9:07 am to
That is true. Were you the one blaming Carter? I can't even stand to hear Carter's voice. But this is not on him.

Whatever Clinton did, Bush made worse. Bush also did huge tax cuts and then started a war on the far side of the planet. Exactly the opposite of how a government should act when starting a war.

If Bush had wanted to hurt the United States, he picked a good course of action to do so.
This post was edited on 4/3/17 at 9:08 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram