re: NYT reporting Trump campaign in contact with Russian intelligence

quote:

---

This is regurgitated old news. Monafort is long gone and the FBI investigated him and he obviously was cleared from any nat sec issues.

The next headline will be.

All Trumps people are KGB.

---

When in doubt post a bunch of shitty out of touch memes from your weird arse Facebook. That will prove you aren't a weird arse balding 40 something!

quote:

---

Sorry but the intelligence community is unelected

---

Yeah. So is everybody else in the executive branch except the President and VP.

quote:

---

r coup to try and turn back the choice of the American people should be met with extreme violence.

---

Or maybe, just maybe there is some concerning information that should be known, even if it's not anything impeachable.

quote:

---

It's time to hang some spies.

---

Of course I'm sure you were calling for the death of people who hacked and/or leaked information that probably benefited Trump in the end.

Either you want to know the questionable workings behind the scenes, or not. You can't selectively praise one, and then become extremely outraged in the other.

My God. This is the most glorious Valentine's Day of all time... of ALL TIME!!

Thx. Did not know that

So there is no evidence of wrongdoing. They why the story?

I am going to tell you what the story is about to be. A whole lot of leakers and speakers with anonymity are about to be outed. And indicted.

And if it leads back to OBAMA we will see what happens.

quote:

---

1) Nobody stole Hillary's e-mails

---

Well he hoped they had. But we don't know if they were stolen or not, which is her fault though.

quote:

---

2) Trump jokingly asked the "Russians" to get her 33,000 deleted e-mails and release them.

---

And humor never has any truth to it?

quote:

---

3) He didn't ask for Russian intelligence to do it.

---

So he said "Russians," but because he didn't say Intelligence that is somehow different? And even if he didn't say intelligence, who else in the "Russians" is better at obtaining that information than the Intelligence community who is trained to do it, and they've done it quite well. Especially since the discussion was about Russian Intelligence.

quote:

---

shite is about to get real....

---

shite is always real, and it's always shite. That is precisely what the NYTimes has put to paper.

Can you tell us, if assuming every single NYTimes claim is true, was any law broken here? Other than the individuals who leaked Classified Information to the NYTimes, of course. Or other than perhaps illegal wiretaps orchestrated by the Obama Administration. Was any law broken?

The FBI reviewed Flynn's wiretapped conversations and concluded there was nothing illegal about them. Justice did the same. So what specifically are the allegations of illegality?

But . . . . the Russians!
No illegality alleged. But these guys actually talked to . . . . the Russians!
Oh my!
Can you believe it?
Who would do such a thing?

In a way, all this newfound breathless Democrat hysteria about Russia is simply sad. It shows what a complete mindless clusterf*ck that once great party has become. Four years ago Dems laughed Romney off the stage when Obama told him "the 1980's want their foreign policy back." Four years later the same turkeys now seem to want to start WWIII over Russian sympathizers rebelling in Eastern Ukraine. Why? Well, to oppose the GOP of course. It is policy without foresight.

The Russian hysteria appears to be action for sake of action with no consideration of goal, risk, or results of negative outcome. It is the essence of an approach centering around the philosophy of "hope and change". Hope is no method. Change is no endpoint. Yet those are the basics to current Democrat approach.

quote:

---

In a way, all this newfound breathless Democrat hysteria about Russia is simply sad. It shows what a complete mindless clusterf*ck that once great party has become.

---

Just an update. Democrats and the MSM are quiet on Russia now.