Started By
Message

re: Newspaper conglomerate considers building massive database of gun owners

Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:54 am to
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57256 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:54 am to
quote:

Do you really want to restrict the right to free speech?
Strawman much? This isn't a free speech issue.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57256 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Sure, as long as there is an income tax.
Cool. Post up your tax return! What could possibly go wrong if we all had your full name, address and SSN.
This post was edited on 1/24/14 at 10:58 am
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 11:32 am to
quote:

Strawman much? This isn't a free speech issue.

Don't be such a hack.
quote:

Newspaper conglomerate considers building massive database of gun owners...Lawitz said the news conglomerate currently has no plans to publish the database.

“We do not typically publicly comment on internal propriety communication. However, we have no plans to publish any names on any lists. Further, we are open to discuss any published reports,” Lawitz said.

I guess you can't help it:
quote:

Cool. Post up your tax return! What could possibly go wrong if we all had your full name, address and SSN.

It's not currently a matter of public record. I don't want that information released - but then, I don't want to pay income tax either.

BTW, in the past my income was a matter of public record - and was actually published by the news media. It is what it is.

I'm sorry that you want the government keeping secrets from the People.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57256 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 11:38 am to
quote:

Newspaper
Being a newspaper doesn't automatically make something a free speech issue. Especially since "However, we have no plans to publish any names on any lists."

quote:

It's not currently a matter of public record. I don't want that information released

Perhaps I misunderstood?

quote:

I'm sorry that you want the government keeping secrets from the People.
Good grief.

quote:

I believe doctor/patient confidentiality should supercede public records requests.
This post was edited on 1/24/14 at 11:41 am
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Are you suggesting I carry illegally, or just not carry?

I neglected to mention one other option:

Open carry.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
35632 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

Newspaper conglomerate considers building massive database of gun owners
With this preoccupation, they now have a reason for not covering the news.
What's Fox and CNN's excuse?
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

"However, we have no plans to publish any names on any lists."

They reserve the RIGHT to, and after all, isn't that what all the uproar in this thread is about? Imean, what if they collected a bunch of data on citizens and then never did anything with it? What if they gave a party and nobody came?
quote:

Perhaps I misunderstood?

I don't believe that, I believe you're simply being obtuse.
quote:

I believe doctor/patient confidentiality should supercede public records requests.

Maybe I don't want doctors sharing patients' private information with the government because if they did, it would enter the public domain.

The issue here isn't what the press should be allowed to do, the issue is what information the government should be allowed to keep on private citizens. If you don't want the press to publish records of CC permit holders, change the laws so that the press can't gain access to that info. While I'm against that, I don't blame the press for doing something perfectly legal - AND WITHIN THEIR 1ST AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO DO.

Isn't it public record that I hold a permit issued by the State to operate a motor vehicle? Is there some explicit privacy law prohibiting the release of CC permit holders to the public? Is that what you advocate?
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48313 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

Since when does a private interest have to declare a purpose for its legal activities?


I did not ask whether they had the right to. I am simply asking for what purpose would they gather this information. I cannot think of a single reason why they would gather this information other than to passive-aggressively harass people following the law.

I believe it just shows that there are some political agenda-driven aspects to this large media conglomerate.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57256 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

They reserve the RIGHT to, and after all, isn't that what all the uproar in this thread is about?
Not entirely. Many have expressed concern the government released the info.

quote:

Imean, what if they collected a bunch of data on citizens and then never did anything with it?
Sure. With bulging newsroom staffs, I'm sure they work on all sorts of projects they never intend on using.

quote:

I don't believe that, I believe you're simply being obtuse.
Project much? I thought your position was, that you believe tax returns should be public. I was giving you the opportunity to clarify. (Which you didn't) If you don't, I stand corrected. No need for hostility.

quote:

Maybe I don't want doctors sharing patients' private information with the government because if they did, it would enter the public domain.
Ummm VA is the government.

quote:

The issue here isn't what the press should be allowed to do, the issue is what information the government should be allowed to keep on private citizens.
Yup. Hence, not a free speech issue.

quote:

Is there some explicit privacy law prohibiting the release of CC permit holders to the public? Is that what you advocate?
No. I don't advocate getting a CC just for this very reason. It's always been odd to me that 2A advocates are against gun registration because it leads to confiscation, but they willingly sign up for a CC.
This post was edited on 1/24/14 at 12:57 pm
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

I did not ask whether they had the right to. I am simply asking for what purpose would they gather this information. I cannot think of a single reason why they would gather this information other than to passive-aggressively harass people following the law.

Why does any corporation do whatever they do?

I suspect it has something to do with potential to increase shareholder value. If you disagree with what they are doing, don't consume their product.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48313 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

Why are you so in favor of the government keeping information from the public?


Because it's information about private individuals, who never asked the government to record that information. The only reason the government has this information is because individuals submitted to the government under threat of imprisonment.

You just said that you're against the government tracking mental health issues because of the possibility of it being released publicly. This is the exact same issue.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 2:54 pm to
Here's an interesting opinion...

quote:

Hmmm. Time to build and publish a massive list of newspaper editor cell phone numbers and home addresses
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
33001 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 3:36 pm to
Remember when journalists and newspapers were known to report the news instead of pushing agendas?
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 4:11 pm to
That was a long time ago...
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 1/24/14 at 6:10 pm to
Publish his name and address.

And the name and address of his family and those upper level employees that work for him.

While we are sharing information.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 1/25/14 at 8:35 am to
quote:

You just said that you're against the government tracking mental health issues because of the possibility of it being released publicly. This is the exact same issue.

So you're saying people who carry concealed weapons are crazy?

Yep, you're definitly a liberal.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57256 posts
Posted on 1/25/14 at 10:04 am to
quote:

Why are you so in favor of the government keeping information from the public?
--------------------------
Because it's information about private individuals,
Exactly. There is a massive difference between a government keeping secrets about it's own activity, and keeping secure information about private citizens.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 1/25/14 at 10:30 am to
quote:

keeping secure information about private citizens.

Please point out where CC permit lists are considered "secure" under the law.

tia

But be careful with Antonio, he's actually equating a private citizen freely petitioning the government for a permit to participate in a regulated activity to a private citizen having his doctor diagnose a disease. To me that indicates something less than sincerity.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57256 posts
Posted on 1/25/14 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Please point out where CC permit lists are considered "secure" under the law.
Good grief. Do you think acting responsibly isn't possible unless there is a law?

quote:

But be careful with Antonio, he's actually equating a private citizen freely petitioning the government for a permit to participate in a regulated activity to a private citizen having his doctor diagnose a disease. To me that indicates something less than sincerity.
No. He isn't. You're distorting his argument in order to have something winnable to argue against. To me that indicates something less sincerity.
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 1/25/14 at 10:54 am to
quote:

I happen to believe that everything the government does, or tracks, should be public information. You don't? :chilling:


This one did it for me.

You have to be the most staggeringly naive poster in the history of the PT to have knuckled in that one on your keyboard.

Birth certificates, VA medical records, government worker annual appraisals, application data for government jobs, income tax data, SS data, prescription drug data, strategic/tactical military plans, CIA info, NSA data, military readiness information, incarceration details, and I'm just getting started.

I'm out.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram