- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Milo's Book Has Been Canceled
Posted on 2/21/17 at 4:52 am to KosmoCramer
Posted on 2/21/17 at 4:52 am to KosmoCramer
quote:
He was raised in a Jewish home and is now a Catholic.
Both are lies.
0
Posted on 2/21/17 at 5:28 am to Boudin
quote:
Another publisher will gladly do it
At this point he should self publish anyway...the only advantage to using a tradional publisher is the marketing they do....but Milo now can do his own marketing....this is the best thing that could have happened to him....like the Turner Diaries...they POS wouldn't have sold 10000 copies had it been published and marketed properly....but it being shunned by Publishers made it a cult classic and the rest is history...
Posted on 2/21/17 at 5:58 am to northshorebamaman
quote:
sex with 16 year olds
The UK was 16 in the 90s
Posted on 2/21/17 at 6:17 am to the808bass
quote:Right.
When the adult speaks similarly of his younger years, and those expressions are similar to other adult recollections, and all of those correspond to younger years' experience, the adult inevitably makes the best call
This is just silly. You've been losing your mind for roughly a year. No reason to stop now.
Keep in mind we are not talking about Milo extrapolating his experiences to others. His discussions as far as I can discern are relegated strictly to his own personal individual isolated singular experience. That's it.
So you hold that Milo's adult recollection of his own personal postpubescent perceptions, views, and treatments are incorrect. You as a stranger assert you know better than Milo what Milo was feeling, thinking and experienced, and what Milo feeling and thinking now relative to Milo's experiences 15-20 yrs ago? Really?
Well that is some damn fine insight.
/s !
. . . and you have the audacity to claim I've lost my mind?
Posted on 2/21/17 at 6:27 am to NC_Tigah
Milo made it perfectly clear that "some" 13-year-olders can consent to adult sex because they are "sexually aware".
I don't know how many of you are parents, but imagine your 13-year-old child trying to argue with you that they can consent to X-rated movies, drinking, or whatever because, in their eyes, they are aware and mature enough. Or to be specific, imagine your 13-year-old girl arguing with you that they can consent to sex with a 29-year-old male or female because she is "sexually aware".
I don't know how many of you are parents, but imagine your 13-year-old child trying to argue with you that they can consent to X-rated movies, drinking, or whatever because, in their eyes, they are aware and mature enough. Or to be specific, imagine your 13-year-old girl arguing with you that they can consent to sex with a 29-year-old male or female because she is "sexually aware".
Posted on 2/21/17 at 6:32 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:Can you link that quote?
Milo made it perfectly clear that "some" 13-year-olders can consent to adult sex because they are "sexually aware"
Posted on 2/21/17 at 6:36 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Milo made it perfectly clear that "some" 13-year-olders can consent to adult sex because they are "sexually aware".
I don't know how many of you are parents, but imagine your 13-year-old child trying to argue with you that they can consent to X-rated movies, drinking, or whatever because, in their eyes, they are aware and mature enough. Or to be specific, imagine your 13-year-old girl arguing with you that they can consent to sex with a 29-year-old male or female because she is "sexually aware".
How funny, The left is now taking the side of the morality police.
Have you forgotten that you guys are the same people who made it so that our 13 year old daughters can get birth control from doctors, and made it so that it is against the law for the parents to be told.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 6:47 am to Loserman
Are you saying he's wrong? Or are you just being a bitch?
Posted on 2/21/17 at 6:49 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Milo made it perfectly clear that "some" 13-year-olders can consent to adult sex because they are "sexually aware".
What if the 13 year old believes in his mind that he is really 30? What's different than us pretending a man in a dress is a woman?
Posted on 2/21/17 at 6:54 am to Boudin
Trump Publishing?
Posted on 2/21/17 at 6:58 am to AUbused
quote:The argument here has nothing to do with legality, or legal consent. We choose broadbrush borders to make those social determinations. Those borders assume the vast majority over a certain age to have attained enough maturity to allow for an appropriately informed decision. Milo is not, to my knowledge, advocating for change of that legal demarcation.
Are you saying he's wrong?
On the other hand, legal age notwithstanding, intellectual and rational maturity develops in certain individuals far more quickly than in others. That is not controversial. It is fact.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:03 am to AUbused
quote:
Are you saying he's wrong? Or are you just being a bitch?
Why is it ok for a 13 year old boy to say he is a girl and force a school to accommodate his pchycosis, but it's not ok for the same 13 year old adolescent to identify as an adult when it comes to his relationships?
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:08 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
On the other hand, legal age notwithstanding, intellectual and rational maturity develops in certain individuals far more quickly than in others. That is not controversial. It is fact.
This is true. With that being said, would you or anyone here let your 13-year-old daughter consent to sex with a 29-year-old man because she is smart and mature? Would you let your mature and smart son consent to a priest because the priest is going to nurture and care for your child's sexuality, as Milo said is done in that community?
This post was edited on 2/21/17 at 7:17 am
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:11 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Keep in mind we are not talking about Milo extrapolating his experiences to others. His discussions as far as I can discern are relegated strictly to his own personal individual isolated singular experience. That's it.
In the non-Rogan video, he made it quite clear he wasn't discussing just his own experience. I'm not sure you know what you're defending.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:12 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
would you let your 13-year-old daughter consent to sex with a 29-year-old man because she is smart and mature?
Absolutely not and I don't have a problem making it illegal for the protection of the vast majority of 13 year olds that are nowhere NEAR able to make that decision responsibly.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:17 am to Revelator
quote:
Why is it ok for a 13 year old boy to say he is a girl and force a school to accommodate his pchycosis
I dont draw a moral equivalent between a little boy or girl who wants to be tom boyish or girlish and allowing a 29 year old man to frick a 13 year old girl because she "consents".
A much better example would be allowing a 13 year old boy to cut his dick off because he's able to make that decision. I would not support that at all.
The real question here is why do you think a 13 year old boy should be able to consent to being fricked by a full grown man?
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:20 am to AUbused
quote:
The real question here is why do you think a 13 year old boy should be able to consent to being fricked by a full grown man?
I don't and don't be stupid. I'm pointing out the totally arbitrary and illogical position of the left.
Everyone knows that Milo is being destroyed not for what he said, but because he is affiliated with Breitbart
This post was edited on 2/21/17 at 7:21 am
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:20 am to AUbused
quote:
The real question here is why do you think a 13 year old boy should be able to consent to being fricked by a full grown man?
The simple and correct answer is because Milo said so and Milo supports trump . If he was a Hillary supporter or or if a Hillary supporter said what he did, this board would have a field day, and rightfully so. I am pretty sure everyone here knows that. Instead, what we are seeing are many deflections and defenders.
This post was edited on 2/21/17 at 7:22 am
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:22 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
The simple and correct answer is because Milo said so and Milo supports trump . If he was a Hillary supporter or or if a Hillary supporter said what he did, this board would have a field day, and rightfully so. I am pretty sure everyone here knows that.
Nope. I don't support Milo or pedophiles, I think they are sick. But I will always take every opourtiiny to point out the lefts blatant and ever shifting hypocrisy.
Posted on 2/21/17 at 7:42 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:The answer is no. But yours is a nuanced point when compared to Milo's. e.g., Milo's parents would almost certainly have approached consent the same way. That isn't the same thing.
would you or anyone here let your 13-year-old daughter consent to sex with a 29-year-old man
Perhaps the definitive question then for Milo would be, "If you had a 13y/o son, would you approve, or consent, or willingly allow him to have sex with a 29yr-old?" I'll bet the answer would be "no". But we won't know until it's asked.
Page 11 of 13
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News