Started By
Message

re: Joint's Chiefs - No modifications to transgender policy until further direction

Posted on 7/27/17 at 11:37 am to
Posted by JohnnyU
Florida
Member since Nov 2006
12350 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 11:37 am to
quote:

Educate yourself


That's rich coming from a Trump supporter. Trump supporters, like Trump himself, are clueless about details.

Trump doesn't have a clue about the complexities of governance, thoughtful, cogent policy with a plan. He's real big on grandiose promises but not too keen on how to achieve those things. Tax reform- clueless. Healthcare -clueless (but he is waiting with his dick in hand to sign something, anything).

His term thus far has been unfocused and chaotic.

Posted by Tigerbait231
Bossier City, LA
Member since Jan 2009
574 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 11:37 am to
quote:

He lied though, saying he talked to generals. He apparently didn't talk to his official advisers though. Who did he talk to?


I bet it was Putin and Russia, please start a thread about the collusion now.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146657 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 11:37 am to
quote:

Absolutely. He is CIC. He can do whatever teh frick he wants.

He lied though, saying he talked to generals. He apparently didn't talk to his official advisers though. Who did he talk to?
Are you really stupid enough -and or- hate Trump so much...that you contend this means SecDef or any JCS didn't consult the CIC?

There was an article here a few weeks ago that Mattis was 'looking into' the matter. It is a no-brainer he did and reported to his CIC.

They reported yesterday they were awaiting Pentagon DOD exact directives. This is not a gotcha that POTUS went rogue. Even if he did, you are also too stupid to understand he can order this w/o talking or getting advice from anyone. They are awaiting it to go through the proper channels is all, you numbnut.
Posted by Mephistopheles
Member since Aug 2007
8328 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 11:37 am to
Mattis called for 6 months to review this policy and he is on holiday this week. Trump announced the final decision without the Pentagon knowing about it. The press team had no idea and had to refer the media back to the WH. The old policy was up on the armed forces website for hours.

Trump just announced a policy by Twitter without readying the rest of the govt. This isn't smart.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67482 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 11:38 am to
quote:

Did you expect them to just take the text of the tweet? This is a procedure issue. Not the win you think it is

FYI - everything has been discussed at POTUS, Sec Def & Joint Chiefs level......everyone knows what the policy is.....they're just waiting on the written copy.
Posted by RIPMachoMan
Member since Jun 2011
5943 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 11:38 am to
quote:

so give them full auto's and fingers on the nukes... sounds like a good idea


You're right, I am getting really sick of our country being plagued by mass shootings by a transgendered person
Posted by OnTheGeaux
Har Tavor
Member since Oct 2009
3067 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Is the shite storm coverage of the topic worth it?


Left - Yes, mass hysteria!!!!
Right - This "matter" is a non-issue.
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Mattis called for 6 months to review this policy and he is on holiday this week. Trump announced the final decision without the Pentagon knowing about it. The press team had no idea and had to refer the media back to the WH. The old policy was up on the armed forces website for hours.

Trump just announced a policy by Twitter without readying the rest of the govt. This isn't smart.


In point of fact, Trump did not announce a policy via Twitter, His tweets aren't do not constitute government directives. I mean if he tweeted out "gonna have the white house painted today" is that an order for someone to paint the White House? Of course it isn't.

How is Tweeting out a policy any different than holding a press conference and announcing that policy in that if instead of tweeting Trump had got on the podium and announced this new policy do you think the Joint Chiefs would have said "oh okay he announced it at a press conference so that's the new policy" without requiring actual DoD documents changing the policy? Of course not
Posted by Parmen
Member since Apr 2016
18317 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 11:45 am to
quote:

He's CIC, but the military is the military of the people, not the POTUS. It's a volunteer army, not the army of a dictator.

Like how a declaration of war requires congress.


It's his military, not yours.

Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 11:50 am to
quote:

He's CIC, but the military is the military of the people, not the POTUS. It's a volunteer army, not the army of a dictator. Like how a declaration of war requires congress.


Jesus Christ you people are ate up with the dumb arse.

If Congress wanted the UCMJ to allow trannies to serve, they could change the UCMJ. Congress doesn't want trannies to serve, that's why instead of getting the law changed Obama did an end around by issuing a directive to ignore parts of the UCMJ which Trump is now going to reverse

If Congress changed the law, Trump could do NOTHING about it. Assuming they had enough voted to over ride a veto of course
Posted by Cruiserhog
Little Rock
Member since Apr 2008
10460 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 11:51 am to
quote:

You think his tweets are official?


uh Junk, the tweets of the president are official US policy regardless of what he tweets. Everything he tweets becomes a national archived document....so by the gif you posted Im guessing you didnt know that.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 11:52 am to
Your thread title does not agree with the quote in your OP. Why?
Posted by Codythetiger
Arkansas
Member since Nov 2006
27563 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 11:54 am to
So THIS type of mental illness is okay to possess and own firearms, but the others aren't. Got ya.

Thanks for the clarification
Posted by Gcockboi
Rock Hill
Member since Oct 2012
7689 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 11:55 am to
45-50% of Trannies are suicidal. 85-90% are on anti- depression meds.

They are mentally ill and shouldn't serve. I was about to enlist in the marines several years ago, but couldn't, because I'm allergic to bee's. My friend is on paxil, so they didn't let him in.

Trannies are nothing bu attention whore ****s, biggest scum in society. We need to build camps before they spread like a plague to contain the degenerates.
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 11:56 am to
quote:

Are you really stupid enough -and or- hate Trump so much...that you contend this means SecDef or any JCS didn't consult the CIC?


Mattis is on vacation. and the JCS were completely taken off guard. Mattis just initiated a 6 month review on transgender policy.

So yeah, it appears to me he just did this.

I really think it was a distraction (successful) but from what? Only the mind of trump knows.
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 11:57 am to
quote:

the Idiot in Chief was just playing to his fan base since he couldn't get Obama care repealed


This, precisely.

Trump is getting his balls kicked in regarding ACA. He knows it, his base knows it and like any good emperor he needed to deflect from it.

Straight from the Trump playbook.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 11:58 am to
quote:


Mattis is on vacation. and the JCS were completely taken off guard
You base this on?
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 11:58 am to
quote:

uh Junk, the tweets of the president are official US policy regardless of what he tweets. Everything he tweets becomes a national archived document....so by the gif you posted Im guessing you didnt know that.




You truly are stupid and an embarrassment to my state.


being a national archived document =/= policy document.

i will reuse the televised press conference as an example. They to are considered federal documents and are archived, but if the President got up and announced "we will set a policy of............" does that mean every agency affected is going to switch to the new policy? No it doesn't you fricking idiot, because those agencies need actual official paperwork before they can enact policies.

Here's a prime example of Obama saying something that didn't ever become policy, let alone right away. How many times did he say "I will close GITMO?" At least twice during SOTU addresses. Did the guys down there here that and say "oh okay" and close the doors? Of course fricking not.

I reiterate you are a moron.


Posted by 9th life
birmingham
Member since Sep 2009
7310 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

If they wanted the coverage to continue, they would not have sent out a statement regarding the new policy not even existing yet.


Meaning that this "controversy" was created out of thin air and solely for the purpose of changing the course of discussion in the country. Same as when Obama did it. It is an issue that affects a miniscule portion of the population, but evokes passionate responses from all sides.

Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 7/27/17 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

Meaning that this "controversy" was created out of thin air and solely for the purpose of changing the course of discussion in the country. Same as when Obama did it. It is an issue that affects a miniscule portion of the population, but evokes passionate responses from all sides.


Of course. Otherwise known as politics as usual.

That doesn't make it evil or bad policy or stupid though.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram