- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:14 am to The Spleen
quote:
Asks poster on a board that pinned a thread for every Wikileaks release.
Did Russia type those emails for Podesta? Did Russia force him to host a Spirit Cooking dinner in his home?
Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:16 am to burke985
They brainedwashed us with creepy YouTube videos.
This post was edited on 5/15/17 at 9:16 am
Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:16 am to Vols&Shaft83
I want the correct answer, I understand all the collusion with wiki leak theories but what exactly did they do to make more people vote for HRC overall. The problem with the left is they abandoned what makes this country tick the middle class that is why they lost it's as simple as that.
This post was edited on 5/15/17 at 9:17 am
Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:19 am to goofball
quote:
They hacked the voting machine?
There's more evidence out there that our own government did this.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:19 am to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
HEY, SKY RAPER,
If I type it out, are you sure you'll be able to read it?
Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:20 am to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Did Russia type those emails for Podesta?
No surprise your pea brain missed the point.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:21 am to SirWinston
quote:
To which I say: HRC had unprecedented MSM collaboration on her behalf which was obviously far more of an asset than "Russia" was for Trump.
Investigate that.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:29 am to skrayper
quote:
type it out, are you sure you'll be able to read it?
Probably, but if I can't, someone can read it to me.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:29 am to The Spleen
quote:
No surprise your pea brain missed the point.
You had a point?
Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:40 am to burke985
They helped expose Hillary Clinton and swayed public opinion. Assange was part of that along with a process called data washing - look it up .No machines were hacked and they have said as much . Hillary was a shite candidate and most saw through her foolishness without Russian help but they did help . Why are they still going on with Russian collusion ? Russia did this along with other things from Trumps past like his ties with the Russian Mafia , his inner circle with Russian ties, where he got the money to rebuild his empire after bankruptcy , and money laundering. So put two and two together here folks its not hard.... There gonna put this all together in a nice little package to impeach then indict him . Will they pull it off , I have no idea but its coming . Im all about Trump and #MAGA but this is where there going with this so get ready .
This post was edited on 5/15/17 at 9:47 am
Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:46 am to burke985
A lot of conflating influencing the election with influencing the outcome.
Not surprised...
Not surprised...
This post was edited on 5/15/17 at 9:47 am
Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:54 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
lot of conflating influencing the election with influencing the outcome.
Could you kindly explain to us Neanderthals how these things are so different?
quote:
Not surprised
Not a bit.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 10:00 am to burke985
It's weird that we're two pages in and there's not one good answer. I would think it would be easy for anyone to answer this since it's so obvious and what not. 
Posted on 5/15/17 at 10:00 am to DreauxB2015
Lol now we know what's really going on. So Russia gave Trump money after he went bankrupt and that is the reason Trump should be impeached. Do you people hear yourselves? I'm not saying Trump is a great president but he is shedding a light on how fricked up the government is. That's all I ever wanted. So stoked about how well he's done on that front so far.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 10:04 am to LukeSidewalker
Is Skrayper going to give us the correct answer or continue to deflect?
Posted on 5/15/17 at 10:09 am to LukeSidewalker
I agree , I support Trump but there going after him hard and putting things together to fit the Russian/Collusion narrative. In the end we dont have a say with impeachment the ones that do already hate him.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 10:11 am to SirWinston
Serious question: could a foreign government funnel money into a registered PAC? Theoretically, what's the difference between Soros or the Koch brothers giving millions to PAC's and the Kremlin or London doing it? I get there is a fundamental problem with a foreign government having the ability to release propaganda in the US to further their desires and it is not a good thing, but let's not pretend that our elections aren't already having millions of dollars spent by groups/billionaires aiming to gain a political advantage from a certain candidate winning.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 10:12 am to Vols&Shaft83
The correct answer is no. He hasn't been given that talking point yet.
Standby to standby.
Standby to standby.
This post was edited on 5/15/17 at 10:13 am
Posted on 5/15/17 at 10:14 am to burke985
Hillary lost bc she:
- was historically disliked
- possessed a singular campaign strategy--attack Donald Trump
- disparaged Trump voters
- devoted resources in states she did not need to win (e.g., Arizona), rather than shoring up support in deep-blue states, notably the Rust Belt, that she did need
- failed to address the email issue swiftly; instead, it kept coming up and coming up
- failed to get the Dems out to vote
It had nothing to do with Russian collusion.
- was historically disliked
- possessed a singular campaign strategy--attack Donald Trump
- disparaged Trump voters
- devoted resources in states she did not need to win (e.g., Arizona), rather than shoring up support in deep-blue states, notably the Rust Belt, that she did need
- failed to address the email issue swiftly; instead, it kept coming up and coming up
- failed to get the Dems out to vote
It had nothing to do with Russian collusion.
This post was edited on 5/15/17 at 10:15 am
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News