Started By
Message

re: How exactly did Russians influence election

Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:00 pm to
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56352 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

Nothing. It's a false narrative to undermine Trump for 2020. It was immediately made up as soon as they realized Hillary would lose.
No. They made it up after the WikiLeaks releases came out, to make Hillary look like the victim of a conspiracy and to deflect away from the ACTUAL THINGS SHE and the DNC did, like the proven collusion with the media that forced Brazile to resign and Jeff Zucker to issue a public, on-air apology - or the proven conspiracy against Sanders, which forced DWS to resign.

Since she lost, yes, they have rolled it into a non-stop, baseless attack intended to discredit Trump.

Some would like to say this is the Dem answer to Benghazi, but unlike that situation, there is absolutely no proof of anything. The Obama admin. claiming there is only proves that they're loyal partisans. There is no actual proof of anything.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71792 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:35 pm to
I made my point in my first post in the thread. Then you spent four pages missing it.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56352 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

It's not hard to imagine that the government of Russia would have a deep interest in influencing American opinion
Sure, but one of the things that makes no sense is why they would prefer a republican over a democrat when historically, they definitely prefer democrats. shite, they walked all over Obama his entire time in office, and then there's the overheard, recorded comments made by Obama to Medvedev.

It seems like a baseless accusation at best, but very possibly classic leftist projection - accusing the other side of doing what they themselves are doing.

When Macron made the same bullshite allegations, and 4Chan users were equated with "Russian hackers," it began to be comical.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48328 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:52 pm to
Nobody else seemed to acknowledge it. Poor communication on your part.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71792 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

Nobody else seemed to acknowledge it. Poor communication on your part.



Perhaps. I do often forget my audience.

I did offer the crayon option, though.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

Nothing has been made public, but neither you nor I know what they may or may not have found. There is still an open investigation.

That Diane Feinstein said that there is no evidence of any collusion. Don't you believe that she would know?

quote:

Well, I've never said Trump was behind it. I have said the Russians were interested in damaging Hillary to the benefit of Trump.


At this point it is totally irrelevant. Even if they proved without a shadow of doubt that the Russians did that, there is no way to show how much or little it influenced even one vote. Or if it even influence a single vote. You want to go after the Russians? Fine. Have at it. Seems hypocritical to me since we have been influencing elections for over a hundred years.

quote:

I voted for Hilary in the general, then had to go home and take a shower.

I understand. I couldn't bring myself to vote at all. I just couldn't.

quote:

No, I wasn't upset the DNC favored Hillary. It didn't surprise me in the least, and frankly I think Republicans made a bigger deal of it than it was.

I thought the entire reason we vote was so the American people would have a voice in our government. The voice was taken from the American people and your response is, "No big deal."?
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

Are you serious? Bernie Sanders are the dumbest of all.


I'm not a Bernie guy. I hate socialists. They are leeches on society.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

That she has seen. Y'all keep leaving that caveat off when you quote her and others.

She heads up to committee. You don't think she has seen it all? They are keeping it a secret from her?

quote:

ETA: Actually Feinstein said "not at this time," when asked if there was evidence of collusion.

After a year of investigation. I guess you guys can keep hoping.
Think about it. Don't you think they have been digging just as hard as they can...I mean considering how much they hate Trump?
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

Not really. Clinton's server seems to be the only one that wasn't hacked.

Actually many experts believe that her e-mails were hacked, according to the NYTimes.

Experts believe Hillary got hacked

ETA
Readers Digest Version:

When the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, said on Tuesday that his investigators had no “direct evidence” that Hillary Clinton’s email account had been “successfully hacked,” both private experts and federal investigators immediately understood his meaning: It very likely had been breached, but the intruders were far too skilled to leave evidence of their work.

Mr. Comey described, in fairly blistering terms, a set of email practices that left Mrs. Clinton’s systems wide open to Russian and Chinese hackers, and an array of others. She had no full-time cybersecurity professional monitoring her system. She took her BlackBerry everywhere she went, “sending and receiving work-related emails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries.” Her use of “a personal email domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent.”
This post was edited on 5/15/17 at 5:58 pm
Posted by keks tadpole
Yellow Leaf Creek
Member since Feb 2017
7580 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:48 pm to
Nothing. Zero. Why would the Russians risk means and methods? The whole Russians story is a last-ditch defense against "IT". The tin-foil hat, word that won't be spoken "IT". Because if "IT" is real, the only defense against "IT" is the Russians planted "IT" there. Why else are so many establishment Republicans completely freaking out about the Russians? The broke-arse Russians with torpedoes that run on hydrogen peroxide and an air-craft carrier that threw a rod and had to be towed to Syria.
Posted by Delacroix22
Member since Aug 2013
3956 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 7:22 pm to
Nothing

A DNC insider helped LEAK Podesta's emails

Podesta's email password was "p@ssword"

The insider strolled right in

Posted all the awful shite to Wikipedia

Hillary lost

"Muh Russian hackors interfered with muh election" "Trump helped Russia / Russia helped Trump"

Nothing was "hacked"
Things were LEAKED
Trump did not actively collude with Russia
Russia did not actively collude with Trump

Trump wanted better relations with Putin
Hillary wanted a good excuse as to why she lost
The left wing propaganda machine found this to be an easy lie to sell the American public to paint Truml as illegitimate and undermine his presidency and future reelection

Notice how you don't hear anything Trump DOES. It's just all speculation from unnamed sources about bullshite. It's meant to distract and sway opinion.

Thought control at its finest.
Posted by Cincinnati Bowtie
Sparta
Member since May 2008
11951 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 7:33 pm to
How about the dumb bitch was too cocky to campaign in the Rust Belt? Russia did that?
Posted by Cincinnati Bowtie
Sparta
Member since May 2008
11951 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

I thought the entire reason we vote was so the American people would have a voice in our government. The voice was taken from the American people and your response is, "No big deal."?
Please explain what was done to "take the voice."
Are you really this fricking stupid?
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram