- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How do you define "interference with the election process"
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:33 pm
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:33 pm
I'd say that the rigging of a presidential debate by collusion between one candidate and the supposed impartial moderator is one hell of a huge scandal
That is how I define interfering with our election process
6
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:35 pm to Old Sarge
It's actually not all that complicated a concept. I'm a native speaker, though.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:39 pm to Old Sarge
I certainly don't consider actions that make voters more fully informed interference.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:41 pm to Navytiger74
LOL. HRC received no questions in advance in any of her debates with Trump.
And there was no set of circumstances under which Bernie could have been nominated by a party he did not even belong to and still doesn't. Bernie has run against Democrats in VT for over 30 years. HRC wiped the floor with Bernie, by 5 million votes to boot. (And I voted for Bernie!) Brazile's "leak" to HRC about question topics at one Democratic debate was stupid as HRC wiped the floor with Bernie in every debate they had.
And there was no set of circumstances under which Bernie could have been nominated by a party he did not even belong to and still doesn't. Bernie has run against Democrats in VT for over 30 years. HRC wiped the floor with Bernie, by 5 million votes to boot. (And I voted for Bernie!) Brazile's "leak" to HRC about question topics at one Democratic debate was stupid as HRC wiped the floor with Bernie in every debate they had.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:42 pm to Old Sarge
I define it as dnc insiders working with media organisations to pass their preferred candidates questions prior to debates as interference. The democrats cheated and still lost. Sad
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:46 pm to Old Sarge
If you ain't cheatin' you ain't tryin'
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:48 pm to GeorgeWest
quote:you seem to have lost all the self-righteous indignation for election rigging you had in the other thread. Funny that
Brazile's "leak" to HRC about question topics at one Democratic debate was stupid as HRC wiped the floor with Bernie in every debate they had.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 4:11 pm to FutureRATeammember
quote:
I define it as dnc insiders working with media organisations to pass their preferred candidates questions prior to debates as interference. The democrats cheated and still lost. Sad
It's not mutually exclusive. The democrats can interfere with the election and the Russians can interfere with the election. This is not difficult to understand.
Do you think the Russians just hacked Democrat emails and tried to hack Republican emails just for fun? There were no other motives?
Posted on 1/5/17 at 4:21 pm to Old Sarge
Trying to hack into the voting machines located in Georgia
Posted on 1/5/17 at 6:25 pm to cahoots
quote:
Do you think the Russians just hacked Democrat emails and tried to hack Republican emails just for fun? There were no other motives?
I don't think the RNC fell for phishing expedition.
This post was edited on 1/5/17 at 6:27 pm
Posted on 1/5/17 at 6:27 pm to Old Sarge
Creating false media outrage and dog and pony show intelligence agency "investigations" and congressional hearings over a non event because you are butthurt about the outcome of an election while hiding behind a mask of false patriotism.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News