Started By
Message
locked post

Gorsuch is already paying dividends...

Posted on 4/21/17 at 9:50 am
Posted by CommoDawg
Member since Jun 2015
2322 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 9:50 am
For the grim reaper...

This post was edited on 4/21/17 at 9:53 am
Posted by Covingtontiger77
Member since Dec 2015
10267 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 9:52 am to
Good wait until Kennedy retires this summer and we can stack the court even further!

Also, Ginsburg may croak as well!

That will solidify the court for the good guys for decades!

Eat a bag shithead!
Posted by BigD13
French Settlement La
Member since Sep 2013
2513 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 9:53 am to
WINNING
Posted by Rover Range
Member since Jun 2014
2768 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 9:53 am to
Oh the travesty.. you're all about population control on the front end of a potentially good life, but when it comes to the back end of a shitty life, you lose your collective minds.


And fwiw I really don't have a stance on the death penalty because I'm not trashy and don't know trashy people that end up on death row
This post was edited on 4/21/17 at 9:57 am
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
33895 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 9:55 am to
Posted by FalseProphet
Mecca
Member since Dec 2011
11707 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 9:58 am to
You are way overstating Gorsuch's involvement in this. The condemned always needed 5 votes to stop the execution. He was not getting there with or without Gorsuch.
This post was edited on 4/21/17 at 10:01 am
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
11811 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 10:00 am to
quote:

That will solidify the court for the good guys for decades!



i fully expect the next dem pres with dem majority in senate to expand the number of SC justices to re-establish dem majority
Posted by FalseProphet
Mecca
Member since Dec 2011
11707 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 10:02 am to
Sigh. That's not how that works.
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
41130 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 10:02 am to
The state shouldn't be in the execution business.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134865 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 10:03 am to
LITERALLY
I
T
E
R
A
L
L
Y
Posted by tedmarkuson
texas
Member since Feb 2015
2592 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 10:04 am to
This post was edited on 4/21/17 at 10:04 am
Posted by Ingloriousbastard
Member since May 2015
917 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 10:04 am to
Literally..ugh. I hate that word.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37655 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 10:11 am to
If they would just use bullets to the brain, as the Chinese and Russians do, the injectables would be inconsequential.

We worry far too much about the humanity of wasting scumbags.
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29685 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 10:13 am to
quote:

You are way overstating Gorsuch's involvement in this. The condemned always needed 5 votes to stop the execution. He was not getting there with or without Gorsuch.


4 - 4 would have had the same result, fine

but if Garland had been the Scalia replacement, this would likely have been a 5-4 decision the other way

so yes, Gorsuch is already paying dividends
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
11811 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 10:14 am to
quote:

Sigh. That's not how that works.


FDR tried to expand but it failed congress. the constitution does not state the numeber of justices either.

quote:

Article III of the United States Constitution does not specify the number of justices. The Judiciary Act of 1789 called for the appointment of six justices, and as the nation's boundaries grew, Congress added justices to correspond with the growing number of judicial circuits: seven in 1807, nine in 1837, and ten in 1863.

In 1866, at the behest of Chief Justice Chase, Congress passed an act providing that the next three justices to retire would not be replaced, which would thin the bench to seven justices by attrition. Consequently, one seat was removed in 1866 and a second in 1867. In 1869, however, the Circuit Judges Act returned the number of justices to nine,[68] where it has since remained.


President Franklin D. Roosevelt attempted to expand the Court in 1937. His proposal envisioned appointment of one additional justice for each incumbent justice who reached the age of 70 years 6 months and refused retirement, up to a maximum bench of 15 justices. The proposal was ostensibly to ease the burden of the docket on elderly judges, but the actual purpose was widely understood as an effort to pack the Court with justices who would support Roosevelt's New Deal.[69] The plan, usually called the "Court-packing Plan", failed in Congress.[70]


WIKI

we have had 6, 7 9, and 10 justices throughout history.
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29685 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 10:15 am to
quote:

Sigh. That's not how that works.


but it might be moving forward - with the WH & majorities in both Houses of Congress, they could do it if they wanted

interesting info in this thread
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62442 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 10:15 am to
quote:

The state shouldn't be in the execution business.


Its not a business, but they did execute it well...
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25100 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 10:16 am to
quote:

We worry far too much about the humanity of wasting scumbags.


"We" don't. This is the liberals' latest front on the war on the death penalty. I'm not even for the death penalty and what they are doing is so transparent, it's stupid. Dear liberals, win at the ballot box. Let the courts retire from their role as dictators and be courts again.
This post was edited on 4/21/17 at 10:18 am
Posted by Loungefly85
Lafayette
Member since Jul 2016
7930 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Oh the travesty.. you're all about population control on the front end of a potentially good life, but when it comes to the back end of a shitty life, you lose your collective minds.


I'm very pro-choice and even I have to agree with this sentiment.
Posted by kcon70
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2016
2695 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 10:27 am to
Justice gets served and people throw a fit. Move to a lawless country and see how you make out. Then report back and update us on the quality of life.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram