- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Fed. Appeals Court Upholds Travel Ban Block
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:11 pm
quote:
Federal appeals court upholds block on Trump's travel ban: NBC News
CNBC.com staff | @CNBC
Breaking News
A federal appeals court has upheld the nationwide block of President Donald Trump's executive order restricting travel from several predominantly Muslim countries, NBC News reported.
The ruling came from the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals.
It upholds the suspension of a revised version of the executive order that the Trump administration crafted to better hold up to legal scrutiny than an earlier version.
This story is developing. Please check back for further updates.
LINK
This post was edited on 5/25/17 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:12 pm to NC_Tigah
Good. Send it to the Supremes where it will be easy as pie.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:12 pm to NC_Tigah
onto the supreme court.
Should be an easy decision.
Should be an easy decision.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:13 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Unfortunately, SCOTUS is going to hold the ban violates the establishment clause in a per curiam. Book it.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:13 pm to Iosh
Hell yeah we've finally got an opinion that digs into the statutory issues instead of bullshite 1A arguments, thanks 4th circuit
EDIT: Ah crap no we don't. Oh well!
EDIT: Ah crap no we don't. Oh well!
This post was edited on 5/25/17 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:13 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
onto the supreme court.
if trump takes it there.
quote:
Should be an easy decision.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:13 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Gee, who saw this coming? SCOTUS will reverse this. I don't know why Trump didn't request an expedited hearing anyway and bypass the Appeals.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:14 pm to NC_Tigah
Hopefully reason will win out on this one when it gets appealed.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:14 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
onto the supreme court.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:14 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Good. Send it to the Supremes where it will be easy as pie.
Yea once the supreme court rules it legal, trump can ban anyone from any country unless of course they are a green card holder etc.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:14 pm to NC_Tigah
Hopefully no American dies because of their incompetence.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:14 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Circuit Court Upholds Block on Trump's Travel Ban
Of the 13 judges on the panel, three were appointed by Republican presidents and nine were appointed by Democrats
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a halt on enforcing the Trump administration's so-called travel ban, NBC's Pete Williams reported Thursday.
The ban sought to suspend the nation's refugee program and temporarily bar new visas for citizens of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.
A federal judge in Maryland who blocked the travel ban in March cited Trump's comments as evidence that the executive order is a realization of Trump's repeated promise to bar Muslims from entering the country.
LINK
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:14 pm to Iosh
i do not understand anything you just said.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:16 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Should be an easy decision.
Agreed. Good to see that it as so shoddily-written as to make courts have no concern keeping it barred.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:17 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:Maybe.
onto the supreme court.
Should be an easy decision.
But not necessarily to reinstate the ban.
Purpose of the ban was to allow time for us to assess risk. That proposed time will have passed. So this will be an "on the principle of the thing" argument.
IMO, Sessions should have moved the thing emergently to SCOTUS when it was first blocked.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:18 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:Unlikely SCOTUS hears it before November at this point. The first question will be whether the admin finished their studies that were only supposed to take 90 days.
Gee, who saw this coming? SCOTUS will reverse this. I don't know why Trump didn't request an expedited hearing anyway and bypass the Appeals.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:22 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
Unfortunately, SCOTUS is going to hold the ban violates the establishment clause in a per curiam. Book it.
Why would you think that? If they are going to affirm, it will be after full briefing an argument. They don't affirm in summary per curiams.
Summary affirmances only (rarely) come in cases where they have appellate, not cert, jurisdiction.
And why would you think they would decide a hugely important establishment clause issue in a summary opinion?
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:22 pm to Iosh
quote:
Even more, flowing from EO-2 is the alleged state-sanctioned message that foreign-born Muslims, a group to which Doe #1 belongs, are “outsiders, not full members of the political community.” Moss, 683 F.3d at 607 (quoting McCreary, 545 U.S. at 860).
Doe #1 explains how the Second Executive Order has caused him to fear for his personal safety in this country and wonder whether he should give up his career in the United States and return to Iran to be with his wife. J.A. 306.
This harm is consistentwith the “[f]eelings of marginalization and exclusion” injury we recognized in Moss. 683 F.3d at 607. In light of these two injuries, we find that Doe #1 has had “personal contact with the alleged establishment of religion.” Suhre, 131 F.3d at 1086.
Regardless of whether EO-2 actually violates the Establishment Clause’s command not to disfavor a particular religion, a merits inquiry explored in Section IV.A, his injuries are on par with, if not
greater than, injuries we previously deemed sufficient in this context. See Moss, 683 F.3d at 607 (finding Jewish daughter and father who received letter describing public school policy of awarding academic credit for private, Christian religious instruction suffered injury in part because they were made to feel like “‘outsiders’ in their own community”
So because this Muslim got his feelings hurt, we all have to deal with the continued flow of immigrants from countries that share zero values with the United States, have repeatedly shown to foster terrorists, and have no means or infrastructure to provide sufficient vetting. Nice.
This post was edited on 5/25/17 at 1:31 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News