Started By
Message

re: Coal industry aint coming back;Not worth enviormental pollution so GOP can claim a "win"

Posted on 10/10/17 at 6:09 am to
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98730 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 6:09 am to
quote:

coal plants keep closing due to lack of economic viability


Can't have to do with regs. You know...when Obama said a company woyld bankrupt itself building a new one? Kind of like nuclear?
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35391 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 6:13 am to
quote:

Do you even check your opinionated facts before posting? The article is from April of this year.
A blip because of increased exports due to various global issues in coal distribution. Still won't stop the multi year trend. But you probably knew that.

Domestic coal usage, which is what this thread is about, continues to decline rapidly.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
25623 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 6:16 am to
quote:

Can't have to do with regs. You know...when Obama said a company woyld bankrupt itself building a new one? Kind of like nuclear?


Certainly newer regulations have made it less cost effective BUT even conventional coal is still FAR more expensive than the latest generation of NG plants which are 35% cheaper per megawatthour and much cleaner than even advanced coal with CCS.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54208 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 6:17 am to
quote:

Domestic coal usage, which is what this thread is about, continues to decline rapidly.


Link it up. I'd be interested in the numbers.
Posted by 10MTNTiger
Banks of the Guadalupe
Member since Sep 2012
4139 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 6:18 am to
quote:

Nuclear power will kill it over the next 10-20 years.


Not until they figure out a pathway for wastes. If Yucca ever gets approved then I would agree with you. If California wants to ban gasoline vehicles within 20 years, they are going to have no choice but to rely on coal fired power to generate the massive amount of electricity they are going to need.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
52971 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 6:25 am to
You idiot democrats still believe in pollution after 97% of scientists admitted to lying about it and that it was all a hoax?
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35391 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 6:29 am to
quote:

Link it up. I'd be interested in the numbers.
LINK
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35391 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 6:33 am to
quote:

Not until they figure out a pathway for wastes. If Yucca ever gets approved then I would agree with you. If California wants to ban gasoline vehicles within 20 years, they are going to have no choice but to rely on coal fired power to generate the massive amount of electricity they are going to need.
I will agree a bit on the waste issue.

With respect to California, they don't use any coal for electricity generation. I doubt they would open any new coal power plants.
Posted by 10MTNTiger
Banks of the Guadalupe
Member since Sep 2012
4139 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 6:40 am to
quote:

With respect to California, they don't use any coal for electricity generation. I doubt they would open any new coal power plants.


What are you talking about? California gets just under 5% of its overall electrical power from coal fired power plants...it's listed upfront on the state's own website LINK
Posted by CoachDon
Louisville
Member since Sep 2014
12409 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 6:41 am to


quote:

Coal industry aint coming back


Going well here in Appalachia and W.V.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
25623 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 6:42 am to
quote:

If California wants to ban gasoline vehicles within 20 years, they are going to have no choice but to rely on coal fired power to generate the massive amount of electricity they are going to need.


There is certainly going to be an increase in electricity consumption when we move closer to all electric cars across the US. We may have to initially bring some coal plants back on line but possible not depending on advances in renewables and storage in the interim as well as nuclear waste disposal. One good thing about electric cars re grid demand is much of the charging will be done at off peak hours and simply take better advantage of current grid capacity.
This post was edited on 10/10/17 at 6:44 am
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54208 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 6:45 am to
quote:

LINK


Thank you but I'm still skeptical of your original statement seeing as to how that report is from July of 2015. I think by the end of this year we will have a clearer picture of what the coal impact on our country is.

I don't know the answer to this question and maybe you don't either but what source of energy is scheduled to run out first, coal or NG, based on today's usage?
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
25623 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 6:46 am to
quote:

Going well here in Appalachia and W.V.


By what metric? If I didn't know better I would think you were being sarcastic.
Posted by LSU0358
Member since Jan 2005
7918 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 6:48 am to
quote:

significantly more expensive


The only thing is, coal isn't significantly more expensive than natural gas at $3 per 1000 cu ft. If natural gas is down in the 1.50 to 2.50 per 1000 price range, then coal is more expensive.

This is the real reason coal went in the dumps, not Obama environmental policies. Look at gas prices during O's term. A crash from 13.5 to 2.5 in from mid 2008 to early 2009. Then no more than a couple of months at a time touching even $5 natural gas.

If one accepts that natural gas won't be going back to 6 to 10 per 1000 range anytime soon, you realize any "come back" for the coal industry won't be that great.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
25623 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 7:06 am to
quote:

The only thing is, coal isn't significantly more expensive than natural gas at $3 per 1000 cu ft.


Fuel cost is not the only thing that drives final production cost of electricity. The levelized cost per 100 megawatthours for conventional coal is $100.10 where the levelized cost per megawatthour for natural gas fired advanced combined cycle generation is $65.60. These are the current costs but still allows for a lot of NG price fluctuation to still be cheaper than conventional coal, advanced coal with CCS is over $135 per megawatthour.
This post was edited on 10/10/17 at 7:12 am
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35391 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 7:11 am to
quote:

What are you talking about? California gets just under 5% of its overall electrical power from coal fired power plants...it's listed upfront on the state's own website LINK
4.13% is "just under" 5%?

Almost all of that is energy added to their power grid from just outside their state. About 4%. Not exactly dependent or even a significant use.
Posted by CoachDon
Louisville
Member since Sep 2014
12409 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 7:11 am to
quote:

By what metric? If I didn't know better I would think you were being sarcastic.


I finance mining equipment. I'm at mine sites across the Eastern US pretty often. While volume is nowhere near where it was 5+ years ago, there are a lot of operations that have picked up a hell of a sharp pace. Additionally, I've met with strong investors that moved back into the Appachia area from New York to Canada and Australia. These folks are moving in and backing, or taking over failed operations unable to recover from the recent downturn caused by Obama.

The volume and demand for MET coal is high and the price is damn nice per ton. Even a year ago, these sites were abandoned. Today, many are running 3 fricking shifts.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35391 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 7:13 am to
quote:

Thank you but I'm still skeptical of your original statement seeing as to how that report is from July of 2015.
March 2017.
Posted by tedmarkuson
texas
Member since Feb 2015
2592 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 7:15 am to
well son 40% of your electricity in texas is produced by burning coal. i know you think you checked the windmill box but that's not how things work....even a little bit. so you walk around your apartment...oh i'm sorry your "gated community" and you look at 40% of the things you "own" and by own i mean rent, and tell me what 40% you can do without.


congrats son......

Posted by offshoretrash
Farmerville, La
Member since Aug 2008
10175 posts
Posted on 10/10/17 at 7:21 am to
quote:

Coal plants are closing in record numbers with over 20 slated to close in the next few years. They are closing based on market projections, simple business.


They were closing because Obama put regulations on them that made it impossible for them to remain open. We'll see how Trump removing those bullshite regulations work out for them.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram