- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CNN reporting Clinton got 2.9 million more votes BUT
Posted on 12/21/16 at 6:53 pm to Old Hellen Yeller
Posted on 12/21/16 at 6:53 pm to Old Hellen Yeller
quote:You make the same statement about Senate representation no doubt. A moronic argument indeed.
such a moronic argument
0
Posted on 12/21/16 at 6:53 pm to RCDfan1950
You can't have 3-5 cities controlling the presidential election.
Posted on 12/21/16 at 6:53 pm to killercoconut
quote:
Why won't they let this go?
Because the idiots who live in California kind think like our national media
Posted on 12/21/16 at 6:56 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
Do you really want to use that argument? Because we can go down the New York and California trail as well if you want.
Learn how to lose gracefully. Seriously.
Learn how to lose gracefully. Seriously.
Posted on 12/21/16 at 6:56 pm to DyeHardDylan
quote:
It was a landslide. 304 to 227 is an arse whooping. Not sure how anyone could argue otherwise.
People will argue this forever since there is no official definition of a landslide, but consider this.
Hillary's entire pop vote lead was in California. California has, by far, the most ec votes in the usa. Even if you were to allow HRC to double cali's ec votes, she still loses to Trump by 22 ec votes.
Posted on 12/21/16 at 6:58 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
he won in a landslide.
Okay - maybe "landslide" is too strong. It was a competitive election - along the lines of Obama v. Romney, Nixon facing 2 candidates in 1968,JFK v. Nixon, or Truman facing 2 candidates in 1948.
2016 was a comfortable win in a competitive race - not a true "landslide" like Reagan v. Mondale in 1984, Nixon v. McGovern in 1972, LBJ v. Goldwater in 1964, or either of Ike's victories, frankly. None of those opponents cracked 3 digits.
Posted on 12/21/16 at 7:00 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:And was nearly an entire state of Delaware away from going Clinton.
304 is a Texas away from not being elected president.
Posted on 12/21/16 at 7:00 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
whatever semantics you want to spin to defend the Fuhrer.
You do the exact same thing to defend Hillary.
quote:
a divisive clown
Yes, it's well known that Hillary Clinton is a divisive clown.
Posted on 12/21/16 at 7:02 pm to Tigerdev
Still cannot stand Trump. Wish I did not have to vote for him. But facts are facts. A neophyte with no political experience beat the Clinton machine handily. Yet rather than accepting defeat with humility and grace the Left continues to trot out arguments like this. You complained that Obama was not treated with respect in 2008 (though you can only cite an obscure reference to the Republicans in Congress saying they were going to stop him), and yet you have nothing to say about this? It is pretty pathetic actually. Trump is the President-elect. It is time to accept it. Practice what you preach.
Posted on 12/21/16 at 7:04 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
That's moronic?
Throwing out this state or that city that we don't like in an effort to make some hypothetical point is moronic, yes.
Posted on 12/21/16 at 7:05 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:Trump is going to take Obama's pen and phone to all those Obama EO's . . . they are gone.
Trump isn't helping by even attempting to rub it in. Just another example of him being a divisive clown.
Not a matter of rubbing it in. It's more a matter of rubbing it out.
This post was edited on 12/21/16 at 7:08 pm
Posted on 12/21/16 at 7:05 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
304 to 227.
That's a pretty good whipping. Sure made your arse red.
He's still crying about it. Give him time.
Posted on 12/21/16 at 7:06 pm to Wolfhound45
Nothing to say about what? You seem offended that losing the popular vote is even news... It would have been regardless of who benefitted. Clearly it is of *some* interest given that the front page is littered with threads discussing it.
Posted on 12/21/16 at 7:07 pm to Old Hellen Yeller
quote:So you are saying that Hugo made a moronic argument?
Throwing out this state...
Posted on 12/21/16 at 7:07 pm to Old Hellen Yeller
Are you an obtuse, butt hurt loser or just ignorant of history?
Perhaps both.
Perhaps both.
Posted on 12/21/16 at 7:09 pm to member12
2016 election was a landslide.
The 2016 melt was a fricking tectonic shift.
The 2016 melt was a fricking tectonic shift.
Posted on 12/21/16 at 7:10 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
So you are saying that Hugo made a moronic argument?
I think these discussions are pretty easy to follow. Surely you can make an effort
Posted on 12/21/16 at 7:10 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:You forget one thing- it's not a party, it's the goddamm news.
It's a good plan.
The GOP would do the same if the tables were turned.
This post was edited on 12/21/16 at 7:12 pm
Posted on 12/21/16 at 7:11 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Are you an obtuse, butt hurt loser or just ignorant of history?
Perhaps both.
Perhaps you can scuttle the frick right back underneath whatever rock you crawled out from
Posted on 12/21/16 at 7:11 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
It was a landslide
Page 4 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News