- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Belk Follows TJ Maxx, Marshalls, Nordstrom, and Neimans
Posted on 2/9/17 at 8:27 am to AggieDub14
Posted on 2/9/17 at 8:27 am to AggieDub14
The left to the retailers...You're not going to sell her clothing line, are you?
Retailers...No, no of course not. See, no more selling. We'll do whatever you want. Don't be mad at us. Please!
Grown people acting like middle school clique whores. Pathetic.
0
Posted on 2/9/17 at 8:27 am to AggieDub14
She should just sale it online
Posted on 2/9/17 at 8:28 am to tigerpawl
Shouldn't the businesses be able to make their own decisions? Boycotting is a form a protesting, so if someone stops shopping there for this reason then they are a snowflake.
Posted on 2/9/17 at 8:29 am to AggieDub14
Have your credit cards from these merchants cancelled, telling them the reason. Tell them you will no longer shop at their stores.
Posted on 2/9/17 at 8:30 am to AggieDub14
Its pathetic. Stop trying to defend this
Posted on 2/9/17 at 8:31 am to SDVTiger
It's pathetic a business would do what they wanted to or react to the market? I swear the hypocrisy in this thread is so thick I could spread it over toast.
Posted on 2/9/17 at 8:32 am to alatxtgr
That sounds like what a snowflake would do. If libs started doing that in a reverse situation, this entire board would shout at the rooftops "THOSE LIB CUCKS ARE MELTING!"
Posted on 2/9/17 at 8:33 am to AggieDub14
Its pathetic they said due to sales not politcal
If they were honest i would be fine with it. But they are lying. Stop being a tard about this
If they were honest i would be fine with it. But they are lying. Stop being a tard about this
Posted on 2/9/17 at 8:36 am to LSU_Saints_Hornets
You sound really smart.
Posted on 2/9/17 at 8:36 am to SDVTiger
You don't know the facts. You just assume they are lying.
Posted on 2/9/17 at 8:37 am to Phil A Sheo
quote:
Well shite, I actually liked Belk..
Do you honestly give a frick that a retailer stopped selling a center-left woman's clothing line?
Posted on 2/9/17 at 8:37 am to AggieDub14
Res Ipsa.
Posted on 2/9/17 at 8:39 am to AggieDub14
quote:
Free market or political reasons?
Not mutually exclusive. You black/white thinkers are a hoot.
Posted on 2/9/17 at 8:39 am to Pettifogger
quote:
Do you honestly give a frick that a retailer stopped selling a center-left woman's clothing line?
That's what I'm wondering. Bunch of men acting like schoolgirls over a retailer deciding to no longer carry a line of women's clothing.
Posted on 2/9/17 at 8:40 am to Dale51
Well since political reasons would be within the realm of free market, no shite. I never said they were mutually exclusive. This thread was bait to point out the hypocrisy of many on this board. I'd say it was successful bait.
Posted on 2/9/17 at 8:41 am to AggieDub14
quote:
You don't know the facts. You just assume they are lying.
quote:
An internal email sent last November 21 from company co-President Pete Nordstrom to employees affirmed they would continue carrying the brand, of which he wrote, “[It] has grown to be a sizable and successful business,” according to Fortune.
Posted on 2/9/17 at 8:41 am to SDVTiger
Oh wow an unlinked quote of a rumor. That's proof for sure. Get out of here dude.
Posted on 2/9/17 at 8:53 am to AggieDub14
quote:
Oh wow an unlinked quote of a rumor. That's proof for sure. Get out of here dude
https://fortune.com/2016/11/22/nordstrom-to-keep-selling-ivanka-trump/
quote:
Ultimately, Nordstrom went on, "Every single brand we offer is evaluated on their results—if people don't buy it, we won't sell it." And since the Ivanka Trump brand, he wrote, "has grown to be a sizable and successful business," Nordstrom has concluded that it's not worth jettisoning, even if some of its customers feel passionately that it should.
This post was edited on 2/9/17 at 9:00 am
Posted on 2/9/17 at 8:55 am to AggieDub14
quote:Yes and yes. Doesn't even matter.
Free market or political reasons?
Posted on 2/9/17 at 10:03 am to Pettifogger
quote:
Do you honestly give a frick that a retailer stopped selling a center-left woman's clothing line?
No, I honestly could care less if it's for good business reasons and not purely political pandering.
As a business owner I've made a valiant attempt to steer clear of a staunch political stance b/c it's not worth pissing people off honestly. Just my personal opinion, but these limp wristed tards have become way to over-dramatic when someone's opinions differs from their own. So why companies are even flirting with this publicly is beyond me and it's gotten out of control here lately.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News