Started By
Message
locked post

Audiences flood to see Noah

Posted on 3/28/14 at 6:23 pm
Posted by Da Sheik
Trump Tower
Member since Sep 2007
7964 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 6:23 pm
LINK

quote:

Darren Aronofsky's controversial biblical epic Noah is winning over faith-based moviegoers at the Friday box office, ending weeks of speculation as to whether the filmmaker's darker take on the story of Noah and his Ark would be a turnoff, according to early returns.


quote:

The Paramount and New Regency movie is also doing pleasing business among mainstream audiences.


This post was edited on 3/28/14 at 6:59 pm
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34945 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 6:28 pm to
You mean the movie where the director bragged about making it as unbiblical as possible?

People are dumb.
Posted by Qwerty
Member since Dec 2010
2114 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 6:30 pm to
The movie where Noah teams up with demon rock monsters to fight Cain's people and protect the ark while using the snakeskin of satan?
Posted by conservativewifeymom
Mid Atlantic
Member since Oct 2012
12033 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 6:31 pm to
I understand it's really not very biblical. Apparently Noah tries to kill his family at one point?!?! Where is that in the Bible? I'll wait for the DVD, maybe.
Posted by goldennugget
Hating Masks
Member since Jul 2013
24514 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 6:37 pm to
Just because people are going to see it doesn't mean they will be satisfied with it.

I refuse to go see this movie because of how much it tries to make the story of Noah into something it's not.

This story of Noah tells the story of a planet where the inhabitants destroy the earth and its resources because they are not environmental, so the "creator" (NOT GOD) floods the earth because man didn't take care of the earth and polluted it. The "creator" (AGAIN, NOT GOD) chooses a drunk and extremely sinful man named Noah to build the ark for the flood.

3 things wrong with that.

1. The flood happened as God's wrath against sin. Not because God was mad because man was not taking care of the earth. It was a judgement from God, next time he is coming with fire.

2. Using "creator" instead of "God" is ridiculous and blasphemous. Would this director make a movie about Mohammad and use the word creator instead of Allah?

3. Noah was chosen because God was pleased with him and his dedication toward obeying God. No where in scripture was he depicted as a drunk heathen.

Posted by Da Sheik
Trump Tower
Member since Sep 2007
7964 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 6:38 pm to
I am laughing at the fact that christian movie goers aren't mainstream according to this article.
Posted by CITWTT
baton rouge
Member since Sep 2005
31765 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 6:48 pm to
Using the term creator instead of God to me is acceptable. The name Yahweh first occurs when Moses is writing the Torah scrolls.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126968 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 6:50 pm to
You should have titled this thread "Audiences flood to see Noah".


:rimshot:
Posted by Qwerty
Member since Dec 2010
2114 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 6:54 pm to
It should precipitate plenty of controversy.
Posted by Big12fan
Dallas
Member since Nov 2011
5340 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 7:09 pm to

quote:

1. The flood happened as God's wrath against sin. Not because God was mad because man was not taking care of the earth. It was a judgement from God, next time he is coming with fire.


So, God believes in collective punishment like Kim Jong-Un? Think of all the little babies whose lungs filled with water as they were gasping for air.

However, it was thoughtful of Noah to drop off the 2 kangaroos in Australia. Probably did it on his way to South America where he dropped off the 2 llamas.
Posted by JazzyJeff
Japan
Member since Sep 2006
3938 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

So, God believes in collective punishment like Kim Jong-Un?
Relax dude! Don't let the fundamentalists on here get your panties bunched up. It's a myth that was written with the intention of teaching theological truths.
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62544 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 7:20 pm to
Yeah, I heard that at the end he debates killing his whole family so that Humanity doesn't destroy the world, all over again....My head is spinning on that one.. No, I won't be going, got to go hoard some more bullets, to protect my family from the real liberals.
Posted by ULL Cool J
Member since Jun 2008
924 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 7:24 pm to
If it shows Noah's drunkedness, does it also address the "Curse of Ham?" (no Arkansas jokes, please)
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39613 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

1. The flood happened as God's wrath against sin. Not because God was mad because man was not taking care of the earth. It was a judgement from God, next time he is coming with fire.


quote:

3. Noah was chosen because God was pleased with him and his dedication toward obeying God. No where in scripture was he depicted as a drunk heathen.


quote:

Yeah, I heard that at the end he debates killing his whole family so that Humanity doesn't destroy the world, all over again....My head is spinning on that one..




SPOILERS


I saw the movie today. Its boring as frick, but let me correct these comments.

1. While the Earth in the movie does look pretty messed up environmentally, ie humans are taking advantage of the Earth, their sin towards each other is also violently depicted, which looks like it includes cannibalism and implied rape/taking advantage of women.

2.Noah is not "a drunk" during the movie. He is rather pious throughout the movie, and tries to do "the Creator's" will. He gets drunk ONE time that runs maybe 2 minutes of film length. This occurs after the flood, where the burden of what he went through has become too much, and he has felt he has failed the Creator. By the way, this leads to his nakedness, which I believe is in the Bible (including the wine drinking), but I may be wrong.

Lastly, he doesn't try to "kill his entire family." Going back to feeling like he failed in the previous paragraph. When the flood finally comes, Noah believes that his duty was to save the innocent animals to return them to Earth, and that Creator's will was for his family to die NATURALLY ending humanity after the task was complete. ie The kids bury their parents, then the second eldest buries the eldest, then the youngest son buries the middle. Then the youngest dies, leaving the Earth in a paradise state without man.

However, his adopted daughter gets pregnant (a miracle as she was previously barren), and he believes he needs to kill the twin girls to complete the Creator's task. Since, obviously, two females can procreate.

By the end, he determines that the Creator chose him to CHOOSE humanity's fate, and he spares the children.
This post was edited on 3/28/14 at 7:39 pm
Posted by beachdude
FL
Member since Nov 2008
5664 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 7:37 pm to
Sorry to be so subjective, but I read this long gasbag article in The New Yorker about Aronofsky, Russell Crowe and the making of this film. (Essentially, what a wonderful troubled artiste Aronofsky is and Russell Crowe, a pleading, neurotic actor.)

Crowe should have taken Patrick O'Brian's Aubrey/Maturin novel character in Master and Commander and used all of his considerable wealth and talent to make multiple sequels and thereby make money and some screen history.

I hope Noah is really a good film and that it stays around in the box office long enough to see, but I have my doubts.

Computer generated special effects will only get you so far.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39613 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

I hope Noah is really a good film


It isn't. I could tell the people in the theater couldn't leave fast enough, so it wasn't my sole opinion.
This post was edited on 3/28/14 at 7:42 pm
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
45276 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 7:43 pm to
quote:

2. Using "creator" instead of "God" is ridiculous and blasphemous. Would this director make a movie about Mohammad and use the word creator instead of Allah?



Considering "Allah" is the Aramaic word for the same "God" that you are referring to (Jehovah) this post doesn't really make any sense. Mohammed was the last prophet according to the Qu'ran, Mohammed is not at all congruous to Jehovah.
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 7:49 pm to
quote:


Considering "Allah" is the Aramaic word for the same "God"


Wrong. Elah is the Aramaic word for God.


ETA: On Noah:
quote:


Here is a short list of some of the stupid story problems in Noah: (Is it possible to spoil a rotten thing? Well, be warned anyway…)

- Some of the angels felt compassion for Adam and Eve. God was so petulant and wrathful that he turned those angels into rock people. Then, human beings killed most of the rock people somehow. So, the rock people hate humans. But they take a hankering to Noah for no reason and build the ark for him.

- Noah chides his son for ending the life of a teeny wildflower. And then he cuts down an entire forest to build his ark.

- We are told that the cities are centers of technology, but when we see the cities close up, they are just tents and unwashed people with really bad hair. You would think if they were so advanced they might have invented shampoo.

- It starts to rain, and five minutes later, Tubal Cain attacks the ark with an army of thousands and thousands. That’s a great general!

- The evil city people believe it is the apocalypse within seconds of the first drops of rain.

- Tubal-Cain hides on the ark -unknown to Noah – for nine months. He stays hidden despite the fact that he is eating the animals raw to keep up his strength. There went all the unicorns, I guess.

- The animals are lulled to deep sleep by a herbal smoke potion. But it has no effect on the humans.

- Noah spends nine months firmly entrenched in his plan to murder his grandchildren at their birth. He’s intractable and insane in his conviction that this is what God wants. But then, when he is about to stick the knife in the children, he just changes his mind. Unmotivated choice.

- Five minutes after they emerge onto the new land, Noah makes himself a winery and gets crazy drunk and naked. It’s not clear if he is angry at “The Creator” or angry at himself or just an introvert who suddenly has nothing to do.

- ROCK PEOPLE. ROCK PEOPLE. ROCK PEOPLE.

I was looking forward to the effects, but, really, the movie storytelling is so bad, that the effects fall flat. The score is over the top and intrusive. It is striving so transparently to make up for the lack of emotion in the picture that it repeatedly calls attention to itself, in the worst way.

Oh yeah, and there is a ton of annoying, superior liberal preaching about how we should all be vegetarians, and that technology and cities are innately bad because they hurt the planet. Dumb, oversimplified liberal utopia nonsense. But it barely offended me because I was so much more offended by the terrible story craft in the piece.


From a really pissed script writer
This post was edited on 3/28/14 at 7:53 pm
Posted by ASTL
In a cubicle
Member since Jan 2014
757 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 7:49 pm to
You're nitpicking all of that, but not at the ridiculousness of the story straight from the bible.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124216 posts
Posted on 3/28/14 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

Big12fan
Big12fan try this, be a man.

don't execute a girl punch and then run away.

if you have something controversial to say, at least be man enough to stick around and field the results.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram