Started By
Message
locked post

Am I the only conservative who doesn't mind that Confederate statues are being removed?

Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:53 pm
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61205 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:53 pm
My attachment to the statues is purely connected to being a New Orleans native. I grew up with them, especial Lee (Lee Circle) and Beauregard. I saw that statue every time my mom took me to City Park. The Davis statue has no meaning for me and I have a dislike for Jefferson Davis as a person.

I have no romantic notions about the Confederacy and I don't like the idea of Confederate statues in this day and age. I totally get why blacks especially would want them removed.

Am I alone on this?
Posted by AggieDub14
Oil Baron
Member since Oct 2015
14624 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:54 pm to
Nope. I agree with you. Put them in a museum.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:54 pm to
+1

ETA: The statues will come down and he still will have done nothing positive to help his constituents. Congrats Mitch.
This post was edited on 5/17/17 at 3:59 pm
Posted by DirtyMike
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Aug 2014
1175 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:54 pm to
Probably
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120172 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:54 pm to
My problem with it is that in a city with so many problems the mayor is focusing his political capital on something so petty.
Posted by Midget Death Squad
Meme Magic
Member since Oct 2008
24494 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

Nope. I agree with you. Put them in a museum.



the question was directed towards conservatives. read the title, numnuts



As to the OP:

I despise any historic statues being removed, regardless if they are confederate or not. A major part of their historic relevance is their location. The fact that all of this bullshite is being done for no other reason than grandstanding in the political arena makes it even worse.
This post was edited on 5/17/17 at 3:57 pm
Posted by AggieDub14
Oil Baron
Member since Oct 2015
14624 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:55 pm to
I saw that. Trumpkin does not mean conservative.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48894 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:56 pm to
No.

The whole issue here is that Mitch Landrieu is seemingly taking this on himself. No input from the legislature or anyone else.

The statues should be placed in a museum at the very least.

To me, you are walking a fine line when you start removing history. Where do you draw the line? The next push will be "all streets named after confederates!"
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61205 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

My problem with it is that in a city with so many problems the mayor is focusing his political capital on something so petty.
No argument there. Obviously there are more pressing problems.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164042 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:56 pm to
No the male libs (lol) here will agree with you and pretend they're conservative.
This post was edited on 5/17/17 at 3:57 pm
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
45163 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:57 pm to
My ancestors all fought for the North. I think it's silly and I don't think some people should be able to cleanse history. I also think it is very silly to apply modern day progressive values to people that lived a hundred or more years ago and view their entire lives and accomplishments through that narrow prism.

Tha being said, I'm not going to chain myself to one of the statues.
Posted by Midget Death Squad
Meme Magic
Member since Oct 2008
24494 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

I saw that. Trumpkin does not mean conservative.




AggieDub14 thinks he's a conservative. How cute
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56204 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

Am I alone on this?


all rational people are with you.

May be a small number, but its a good group of folks.
Posted by wfallstiger
Wichita Falls, Texas
Member since Jun 2006
11348 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:58 pm to
I understand what you are saying. With that said it seems silly as a strategy to fix whatever it is that is trying to be fixed....wish life was so simple. But then again, naming boulevards after MLK seems kind of silly...don't need that to remember him much less his accomplishments
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61205 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

To me, you are walking a fine line when you start removing history. Where do you draw the line? The next push will be "all streets named after confederates!"
I agree. And of course a number of the Founding Fathers were guilty of the same sin. And will we include other sins when we remove history? Your point is well taken.
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:58 pm to
I definitely don't have a strong reaction to it overall.

On the one hand I think pulling them down isn't going to do anyone any good, other than people who just want to make some white people mad. This I have little sympathy for, because people should just have better things to do with their lives than this kind of stupid SJW crusade.

On the other hand, the crap about "destroying history" and calling them "veteran monuments" strikes me as complete hysterical bullshite.

Like most social debates, this issue just makes me conclude "I hate you all".
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:58 pm to
I never gave it much thought before and I'll not really care overmuch after.


I think my signature is my response...to BOTH sides of this.

Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:58 pm to
I don't like it because it exactly what the Taliban does. The liberals are worse than fascists. They're fascists with the maturity level of a teenager.
Posted by AustinTigr
Austin, TX
Member since Dec 2004
2937 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:58 pm to
You can put most of them in a museum... but not Robert E. Lee. He is one of the greatest AMERICANS in our history, and all Americans owe him a debt of gratitude that we were able to heal as a nation as quickly as we did following 4 years of carnage.

R.E. Lee was a noble, good man... and an American worthy of being admired.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67006 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:59 pm to
Depends on the monument. Liberty Place and Bouregard should never have come down as they are a part of the history of New Orleans. Jeff Davis? Eh, I don't have a problem with that other than the fact that removing the monuments was a massive waste of money.

Liberty Place now commemorates the police officers who died fighting AGAINST the White League to preserve the Reconstruction era government which enforced equal rights for African Americans but voided the right to vote for Confederate Veterans. Both sides were fighting for suffrage. The battle marked the end of federal occupation of the South despite the defeat of the White League.

Beauregard was born in neighboring St. Bernard Parish and was buried not far from his statue. He fought for equal rights for blacks, integration of public schools, and founded the New Orleans Streetcar system. He's a native son and should never have been taken down.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram