Started By
Message

re: Car payoff vs larger home downpayment

Posted on 3/26/15 at 9:23 am to
Posted by LSUengineer12
The Best Side
Member since Dec 2011
1850 posts
Posted on 3/26/15 at 9:23 am to
Couv how much is the house y'all are looking to buy? Will you be able to afford 20% down?
Posted by couv1217
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Sep 2007
3327 posts
Posted on 3/26/15 at 9:31 am to
Where would I open a vanguard account? Potentially depending on how much we make on the house
Posted by Delacroix
Member since Oct 2008
3986 posts
Posted on 3/26/15 at 9:33 am to
vanguard.com
Posted by Delacroix
Member since Oct 2008
3986 posts
Posted on 3/26/15 at 9:48 am to
Are you sure you will be profiting 30k? Have you taken into account for realtor fees (6%) and closing cost (6k)?
Posted by hungryone
river parishes
Member since Sep 2010
11987 posts
Posted on 3/26/15 at 10:01 am to
Chiming in: do what it takes to hit the 20% to avoid PMI. Once you can do that, consider other steps.
--how secure is your current employment (and your spouse's)? If you're in oilfield services or other potentially volatile sectors, you might want to sock away some of that cash as a hedge against uncertainty. On the other hand, if you are in a stable field (like, say, a teaching position) with a reasonable expectation of stable future employment, you might plan a bit differently.
--if you can do the 20% AND pay off the car, what will you do with the $350 you free up? It will take just 29 months of saving the $350 to replace it. Do you have the fiscal discipline to save a big chunk of the cash freed up by paying off debt? Apparently you can afford the $350 payment right now without huge budget austerity...but you don't want to pay off that car simply to fritter away the funds. So have a concrete plan and take action to save a portion of it (say, using a direct deposit from your paycheck into a savings account, or similar automatic transfer).
--set up retirement accounts (trad IRA, Roth, SEP, whatever fits your circumstances) and divert a portion of the $350 into those accounts.
Posted by couv1217
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Sep 2007
3327 posts
Posted on 3/26/15 at 10:04 am to
I would take the extra 350 and either put it into savings giving us some breathing room or snowball into the truck payment. Cutting the truck payment down to 3 years
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37706 posts
Posted on 3/26/15 at 10:05 am to
quote:



If it were me, I would invest it. You can get a higher return and make thousands on compounding interest over time. Or you can pay off your car and only save 300$



This is the stupidest thing ever written. The underlying assumption is that paying off the car has an infinite compounding rate of Auto Loan interest rate. At an auto loan rate of 2.5% he is looking at maybe 2 years left paying that sucker off at 350$/mo.

That means he is missing only 2 years worth of capturing the investment premium. Even if we got on average 9-10% return, he is missing out on maybe 700-800$ max difference by year 2. If you discount that back at the investment rate of return, yo uare looking at puting ONLY 575-675$ into investments right now


The question becomes, OP does paying off a depreciating asset and lowering your debt obligation value at a 600-700$ premium?
This post was edited on 3/26/15 at 10:08 am
Posted by LSUengineer12
The Best Side
Member since Dec 2011
1850 posts
Posted on 3/26/15 at 10:13 am to
He said he has 3 years remaining on the loan fwiw.
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 3/26/15 at 10:16 am to
lots of bad advice in this thread.

* Get 20% down on the house/avoid PMI
* If you do not have a emergency fund, use this to fund it
* Pay off car
Posted by couv1217
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Sep 2007
3327 posts
Posted on 3/26/15 at 10:26 am to
Going to try and get PMI
Have emergency fun
Trying to pay off car
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89527 posts
Posted on 3/26/15 at 10:33 am to
quote:

Going to try and get PMI


No - AVOID PMI - PMI is bad, 'mmkay? It's extra interest so the lender feels good about itself.
Posted by couv1217
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Sep 2007
3327 posts
Posted on 3/26/15 at 10:43 am to
I meant get it as in not have it...sorry. Bad grammar
Posted by Delacroix
Member since Oct 2008
3986 posts
Posted on 3/26/15 at 10:49 am to
quote:

The question becomes, OP does paying off a depreciating asset and lowering your debt obligation value at a 600-700$ premium?


If he invested 9k and sat on it 3 years with 8% return he would have made 2100 by the end of year 3 assuming he wouldnt be adding any additional investments.

The only way it could work out better is if he used his 9k to pay off the car and then used the 350 he is saving for continuous investing.

And why does it matter if it's a depreciating asset. The amount owed on the car has zero correlation to the value of the car. The only thing that matters here is the amount owed and the interest rate. Which are both low.

8% > 2.8%

EDIT: If you have no emergency fund, forget about all of this and get that set up first.
This post was edited on 3/26/15 at 10:50 am
Posted by couv1217
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Sep 2007
3327 posts
Posted on 3/26/15 at 10:56 am to
I've got emergency fund.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89527 posts
Posted on 3/26/15 at 10:56 am to
quote:

And why does it matter if it's a depreciating asset.


It matters. Debt is debt. Interest is interest, but debt securing a depreciating asset is bad debt. The asset itself generates negative wealth - all by itself - now you're paying it off over time (a necessary evil) WITH INTEREST - and I don't care how cheap you think money is - pouring it down a hole with abandon isn't cheap at all.

Contrast that to debt securing an appreciating asset? For most people, that's a home. Ignoring the tax advantages, I can understand the min/maxers wanting to extend the payment as long as possible, allow the asset to grow and eventually the equity gains offset the currently very low interest rates, with a profit on top. Or, even better an income producing property - that's one that debt, if structured correctly, can actually make you money, long-term.

But, depreciating assets, like automobiles, computer equipment, CELL PHONES - that's just bad debt all around - particularly with anything above 0% APR.
Posted by Delacroix
Member since Oct 2008
3986 posts
Posted on 3/26/15 at 11:01 am to
quote:

It matters. Debt is debt. Interest is interest, but debt securing a depreciating asset is bad debt. The asset itself generates negative wealth - all by itself - now you're paying it off over time (a necessary evil) WITH INTEREST - and I don't care how cheap you think money is - pouring it down a hole with abandon isn't cheap at all.


I agree with you that you shouldn't borrow for depreciating assets. However, it is done and the loan has already been made. At this point the only difference in paying it off early or paying the minimum is 300$. It makes no difference if it depreciates or appreciates at this point. Which is why I would rather use my extra money to make a profit.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89527 posts
Posted on 3/26/15 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Which is why I would rather use my extra money to make a profit.


So, the OP wants to eliminate 1 car note, then double up the other to get a lot of toxic debt off the books and you would enocourage him to hold both of those loans to maturity, and, instead, buy $10k worth of mutual funds?

My recommendation, on the other hand, would be to eliminate BOTH of those loans, ASAP (not at the expense of bringing too little to closing to avoid PMI), then turn those loan payments into monthly mutual fund buys.

You see, your way nets him, what, 5% on $10K for 3 years - $1500. If he then pivots the $350 per month to mutual funds, he's got about $25k to $27k at the end of 6, with no more car notes.

My way, eliminates $10k of bad debt right now, another however much at the end of 3 years - then turn that $750 to $800 per month in car notes into mutual funds, and he's got $27k to $29k at the end of 6 - with the same 2 cars at the end of both scenarios.
Posted by couv1217
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Sep 2007
3327 posts
Posted on 3/26/15 at 11:22 am to
Let me throw another scenario out there. If we can't avoid PMI, what should I do?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89527 posts
Posted on 3/26/15 at 11:27 am to
quote:

If we can't avoid PMI, what should I do?


Buy less new house or wait.

Sorry for the "Debbie Downer" tone, but that's the way you have to attack big financial decisions. PMI is literally throwing away thousands of dollars to help the lender feel better and enrich the PMI company - it adds nothing to your value, convenience, etc., and raises your effective APR.

This post was edited on 3/26/15 at 11:28 am
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37706 posts
Posted on 3/26/15 at 11:40 am to
quote:

If he invested 9k and sat on it 3 years with 8% return he would have made 2100 by the end of year 3 assuming he wouldnt be adding any additional investments.

The only way it could work out better is if he used his 9k to pay off the car and then used the 350 he is saving for continuous investing.




Why wouldn't he continually invest the car payment?


I know the math behind it. It is what I do. I'm telling you, yes your expected returns would be higher by gambling with the market. You just are exposing yourself to market risk and the returns arent even quite 8% vs 3% but rather 8% vs (3% + artificial future value 350$ annuity)



There is value in lowering your market risk + debt obligations. "Expected values" are just that. Nothing goes as expected

This post was edited on 3/26/15 at 11:42 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram