Sports radio last night said Baylor is seeking admission into ACC

LOL sports radio.

And according to their bylaws, co-champions is correct.

I thought their bylaws said head-to-head determines a winner in a tie breaker situation.

quote:

---

seems far-fetched

---

To be fair, I did hear it as a "rumor" on sports radio. A rumor is only a rumor.

However, if you read the articles written about Baylor in recent days more than a few indicate that Briles and Baylor are absolutely pissed about how things played out this year.

They have a reason to be pissed.

If Florida State at one point in time entertained the possibility of joining the Big 12...it's not too far fetched that the ACC would strengthen itself with a program like Baylor.

The articles I read implied that it was beyond the conference commissioner's control to name Baylor as champion based on the by-laws. That's why Briles was pissed about the "one true champion" bulls**t. But I don't know I haven't read the bylaws.

Funny and creative but come on.

Yes, the SEC is that way in all sports except football. A couple years ago SC was co-SEC East champs in basketball with UT although we got hammered by UT not once by twice.


SC also shared a baseball SEC title with Vandy AND UF even though we beat both 2/3.

Irrelevant to Baylor but the SEC has the same rules in its other sports.

quote:

---

this, plus Baylor would die if it didn't play any Texas schools on a regular basis...of course, Texas A&M could schedule them as a OOC game.

---

Too scared

Bring back the Southwest Conference.

I don't think Missouri is tied down to other in state schools like Baylor is. Wouldn't consider Mizzou's move to be stranger than this rumored move by Baylor. And all Boise State is doing is jumping from the best non P5 conference to the other. How is that strange?

quote:

---

Baylor's not leaving the Big 12 holds their TV rights for the next 12 years

---

Maryland says hello. Changing conferences was big enough for them to just pay the buyout.