Started By
Message
locked post

Grand Jury Doesn't Indict Cops who kill man with down syndrome

Posted on 12/8/14 at 9:56 am
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 9:56 am
for refusing to leave a movie theater.

Basically looks like Eric Garner but the man in question just wanted to stay at the movie theater and watch zero dark thirty again.

LINK /

This post was edited on 12/8/14 at 12:00 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422599 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 10:00 am to
quote:

They also added that having Down Syndrome made him more susceptible to death, but they did not explain how.

geeze louise

Posted by FalseProphet
Mecca
Member since Dec 2011
11707 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 10:00 am to
It really makes me wonder where they pull these GJ members from, because It seems like the majority of this board would vote to return a bill almost every time.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422599 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 10:00 am to
i'm sure prosecutors wait until they have the right GJs for these cases
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54212 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 10:08 am to
quote:

i'm sure prosecutors wait until they have the right GJs for these cases


In the Garner case the GJ was already in session, from what I read.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422599 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 10:10 am to
oh i meant the non-media driven cases. ferguson and garner were already in session
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 10:11 am to
What kind of training do these dopey fricking policemen receive? It needs an overhaul. And do GJ instructions now include the admonition that a cop is justified in doing whatever the frick he wants if a suspect resists in any way?
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
31507 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 10:16 am to
off-topic (sort of):
and what is wrong with this world that a) the people running the theater would call the fricking cops on a DS kid who wants to watch the movie again, and b) that the cops would even give the theater the time of day on such a call.

If i were a cop called to deal with that and arrived to see that kid, i'd say, "Enjoy the show, kid," and then find something to cite the theater owner for.

Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 10:17 am to
quote:

The killing happened when cops arrived to force Saylor to leave a movie theater after he wanted to see “Zero Dark Thirty” a second time.

Police justified their killing by explaining that Saylor verbally and physically resisted their attempts to remove him from the theater.


WTF...could they not see that this guy had downs:



That he was acting like a child wanting to see the movie a second time? How about calling his parents or caretakers? Why not approach the situation as if he were a child (but not like the cops in Cleveland - that ends horribly too)?

Something is broken in our police forces...they need to take a look at themselves and quit worrying about what some football players do before a game.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 10:18 am to
quote:

and what is wrong with this world that a) the people running the theater would call the fricking cops on a DS kid who wants to watch the movie again, and b) that the cops would even give the theater the time of day on such a call.


And definitely this, too. Why not even just let the downs kid watch the movie a second time?
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 10:19 am to
speaks volumes about the cops if they can't tell that that man has downs.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422599 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 10:20 am to
quote:

and what is wrong with this world that a) the people running the theater would call the fricking cops on a DS kid who wants to watch the movie again,

yeah seriously frick that manager. i hope he/she is suffering a severe existential/moral crisis
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118850 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 10:23 am to
quote:

As with all grand juries, the proceedings were held in secrecy.


Of course. It gives the DA and the police who are in cahoots plausible deniability
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90679 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 10:52 am to
This is the type of case we should be protesting over. This shite enrages me...pos cops.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35408 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 10:57 am to
quote:

In the Garner case the GJ was already in session, from what I read.
Could you have more than one grand jury convened at a time? Perhaps you dismiss the ones who don't do as you say early and keep the "good ones" on longer?
Posted by DosManos
Member since Oct 2013
3552 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 11:00 am to
Is this shite real?

ETA: Nvm. Holy shite it is.
This post was edited on 12/8/14 at 11:02 am
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54212 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 11:12 am to
quote:

Could you have more than one grand jury convened at a time? Perhaps you dismiss the ones who don't do as you say early and keep the "good ones" on longer?


Thanks for thinking I'm smarter than Google.
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 11:13 am to
quote:

This is the type of case we should be protesting over. This shite enrages me
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35408 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 11:14 am to
quote:

off-topic (sort of):
and what is wrong with this world that a) the people running the theater would call the fricking cops on a DS kid who wants to watch the movie again, and b) that the cops would even give the theater the time of day on such a call.

If i were a cop called to deal with that and arrived to see that kid, i'd say, "Enjoy the show, kid," and then find something to cite the theater owner for.
The 3 cops were working (off duty) as security for the mall. It's not like the manager called 911. But in any event it was the cops' decisions that led to his death.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98194 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 11:18 am to
More about the altercation here. The cops were off duty and not in uniform. It's very possible the kid didn't even know who they were. And oh yeah, he idolized law enforcement.

quote:

“Ethan was developmentally disabled, not a criminal,” said Joseph Espo, a lawyer who spoke on behalf of Saylor’s parents, Patti and Ron Saylor. “He was entranced by police and police departments and liked communicating with them to the extent that, if there was ever a complaint, it was that he’d call so they could come to the house so he could talk to them.”

Saylor’s mother took cookies to the sheriff’s office at the end of last year to thank the deputies for all the unnecessary trips they made to the house, Espo said.


LINK
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram