re: Weather Chan Co-Founder: "Climate Change Is A Lie"

quote:

---

Climate change is happening...I just don't think we are the cause.

---

The militant atheist strikes again !

quote:

---

It's fun to laughter at.

---

Your post is fun to laughter at.

Other than that, "ivory tower elitist" in the conservative lexicon might as well be "wun dem smartass college bowes". Same thing with scientists.

Your post demonstrates pretty soundly how little you understand science and didn't really merit much on that front.

The misspelling was really the only redeeming factor so I set my focus there.

Look man, I've been through about 2-3 threads discussing the science of AGW and they tend to be REALLY long, time consuming and end the end noone's opinion gets changed. I'd prefer to avoid doing it again if its all the same to you. I'll just leave you with this statement again.

When the majority of the earths climate scientists are retracting their findings and stating that AGW is not a threat I will literally be the first one in here rejoicing. I WANT them to be wrong........I truly do, as everyone really should. But until that time I will function as I do in every other facet of my life. I will defer to the experts who have dedicated their lives to the study of a narrowly focused field of science. Structural engineering, particle physics, nuclear engineering, automotive, medicine.....all those subjects every day you and I and every other motherfricker on this forum defer to the experts......yet magically in evolution and global warming there are those who all the sudden have a problem science and scientists.

This is not a coincidence. This is politics and religion interfering. Have a good evening, I need to finish working out then hopefully get laid.

quote:

---

The hilarious part...and I mean hilarious...is most of the climate change promoters...believe the earth is around 4.5 billion years old that went through it's last ice age about 20,000 years ago...yet think the last 100 years of data is enough data for their science to be pushed down people's throats.

Things that make you say hmmm.

---

It can go both ways.

They can't predict the weather with enough accuracy 7 days out and they are here to say they can predict the climate down the road and the affects with less than 0.0000022222% of the years of the earth's temperatures and such as actual recorded data?

All this "It's the hottest month on record!" stuff is laughable. It's just propaganda to negate the fact that they don't have near enough data to even get a trend of the earth's climate with respect to it's age. We were supposed to be burned up thanks to aerosol cans destroying the ozone, in another ice age, run out of oil, and now this is the new hot item.

quote:

---

The hilarious part...and I mean hilarious...is most of the climate change deniers...believe in a magical sky god ...without any evidence of his existence. Things that make you say hmmm.

---

I mean, if you can't win on facts, at least you can attack their religion because that's relevant amirite?

That's the thing, there is no problem deferring to experts, but that doesn't mean they are beyond questioning. These experts have gone into it with a predetermined outcome. That is not science, as I have already stated. The fact that they could not get results to fall within their confidence intervals shows that the hypothesis was wrong and needs to be changed. Instead of doing the scientific thing and going back to the drawing board, they said that their hypothesis was still correct. That is not science. That is basically a philosopher who is good at compiling data.

So, until scientists start correctly applying the scientific method, I'm going to be incredibly skeptical of them, as should any science loving individual.

Please telle you studied that graph before posting it.

I attended a biofuels conference in DC put on by the Dept of Energy as an industry rep in what was basically a fact finding mission to see if any legitimate business opportunities existed for us at the time.

I knew there would be a leftist tilt to the event but when I saw the spokesperson for the Natural Resources Defense Council was giving the keynote speech, I was a bit surprised. Dept of Energy staffers and leading academics were there as well as industry folks and US policy was being discussed ad nauseam. I thought having a woman from the NRDC open the conference was over the top given their extreme politics.

To the left leaners who frequently call this board a conservative echo chamber, I suggest you attend an event like this and see how well received an opposing viewpoint is.

I can only suppose that conferences on climate change are cut from the same cloth.