Started By
Message
locked post

Prosecution... for doing all you can for your son

Posted on 9/11/14 at 10:58 pm
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
39948 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 10:58 pm
quote:

Speaking to CNN's Anderson Cooper, Diane Foley said that she felt cut off at every avenue by US officials and were threatened with prosecution should they try to pay for her son's return - a move that left her feeling 'horrified'.


Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27305 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 11:02 pm to
What could they prosecute her for?
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
39948 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 11:04 pm to
Dunno, but the stance is as sick as it was for the Benghazi left behinds.
Posted by Tigah in the ATL
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2005
27539 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 1:12 am to
it is sad that her loss has her now on TV.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123909 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 1:20 am to
quote:

What could they prosecute her for?
Paying a ransom to ISIS could be construed as "funding" a terrorist organization. Lovely, eh?
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
23712 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 5:08 am to
Can the family sue and or file charges against the individuals that threatened them? They should at least name names in the media and call them out for allowing their son to be killed.

If it were your son, what would you do? I would have had no faith in the Obama Administration and I would have tried every avenue to save my son. And then let the government bastards do what government bastards do.
This post was edited on 9/12/14 at 5:10 am
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27824 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 5:37 am to
That's bullshite if true. People pay ransoms all the time. It's a tax on doing business in shitty places, IMO.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64658 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 5:39 am to
Paying a ransom to ISIS could be construed as "funding" a terrorist organization. Lovely, eh?


Did not our own government pay ransom for terrorists?

We used bodies instead of monies.
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 6:06 am to
quote:

What could they prosecute her for?


Giving money to terrorists.

Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 6:10 am to
quote:

Paying a ransom to ISIS could be construed as "funding" a terrorist organization



ISIS is a terrorist organization. Money is funding. There you go.


Paying ransoms to terror organizations puts all Americans abroad at greater risk for exactly the same thing happening to them.


Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21234 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 7:33 am to
So do you agree that if a family was able to raise the money to get one of their loved ones back home safe, they should be prosecuted for "funding" terrorism?
Posted by DrunkenStuporMan
The Mothership
Member since Dec 2012
5855 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 8:10 am to
You do realize that you can buy kidnap and ransom insurance for visiting dangerous parts of the world? LINK

Would you say that its ok to pay drug cartels in middle and south America a ransom but not ISIS? They all control and sway opinion through the use of fear and force.
This post was edited on 9/12/14 at 8:20 am
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95429 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 8:40 am to
quote:

You do realize that you can buy kidnap and ransom insurance for visiting dangerous parts of the world? LINK


For those too lazy to read the link, watch the movie "Man On Fire".

It's about this exact thing, as Densel Washington plays a bodyguard for a kid necessary for the family to keep their ransom insurance policy.
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
39948 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 8:47 am to
I understand the idea the it's FedGov policy not to pay ransoms... I'm down with that.

But to pressure a family with prosecution is way, way out of line.

And considering we just officially ransomed 5 Gitmo detainees for Bergdahl, do we prosecute the Gov officials that gave the "ok" for that transaction? LINK

I wonder if Obama would broker a beer summit between the Bergdahl and Foley families. Wondering how that might go.
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 8:49 am to
quote:

What could they prosecute her for?
Aiding and abetting. Sending terrorists money would look bad.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95429 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 8:51 am to
quote:

Aiding and abetting. Sending terrorists money would look bad.


And sending 5 high-ranking terrorists from Gitmo to them doesn't?


ISIS has funding out the arse right now. A token ransom paid on this guy would have been a drop in the bucket for them compared to everything they've seized in Iraq.
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 8:52 am to
quote:

ISIS has funding out the arse right now. A token ransom paid on this guy would have been a drop in the bucket for them compared to everything they've seized in Iraq.

Which is why it would have been a terrible move to let it happen.

I'm not accusing the mom of making a terrible move. She's a parent, not a diplomat or military advisor, and at that time I'm sure she gave zero fricks about the optics, but it wouldn't have helped anything to send them money.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95429 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 8:53 am to
quote:

She's a parent, not a diplomat or military advisor, and at that time I'm sure she gave zero fricks about the optics, but it wouldn't have helped anything to send them money.


It would have raised the chances, however small, of getting her kid back in one piece vs. beheaded.
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 8:54 am to
It wouldn't help but it looks bad when the gov can't follow the rules considering a few months ago they payed a ransom to bring back a traitor.
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 8:54 am to
No it wouldn't. Somali pirates? Most definitely. ISIS? No.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram