Started By
Message
locked post

It's time for a Universal Basic Income

Posted on 9/9/14 at 8:53 am
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115500 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 8:53 am
This article was on the front page of Yahoo...

LINK
quote:


Free money for everyone!

With weak job growth, rising poverty, and the rich continuing to devour nearly all economic growth, it's an idea that is gaining more credence. Arguments for a universal basic income (UBI) — in which everyone without exception would receive an equal stipend — have flourished in policy-centric areas of the internet, including The Week. Advocates of UBI see it as a blunter, more effective means of reducing poverty and shrinking the inequality gap.

quote:


Therefore, one can easily imagine the historical process described by Marx going in reverse. In today's labor market, where there are still twice as many job seekers as job openings, the constant conservative carping about the "dignity of work" sounds more jarring and vindictive by the day.

As someone with a nice, stimulating job, I agree that work can help people flourish. But in an economy that is flatly failing to produce enough jobs to satisfy the need, a universal basic income will start to seem more plausible — even necessary.


Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51794 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 8:56 am to
It blows my mind that people think this system works. Time and again, history has given us countless examples where it doesn't.
Posted by goldennugget
Hating Masks
Member since Jul 2013
24514 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 8:57 am to
Ridiculous

If everyone had a universal income.. it then would be the same as everyone not having a universal income. Based on supply and demand, and natural economic market laws (unless the gov't is going to start setting prices too), all prices would raise by the value of the universal income, cancelling it out.

Not to mention, if everyone had a UBI... why would anyone flip burgers? Mop floors? Collect garbage? Someone has to do those jobs. And I am sure most people would rather sit on their asses than do some menial job. Therefore places like McDonalds would have to pay $15 an hour to attract people to flip burgers. Hello higher prices.
Posted by ZacAttack
The Land Mass
Member since Oct 2012
6416 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 8:58 am to
I've been unemployed for about 6 months and even I think this is a bad idea. It encourages laziness, and poor money choices. This doesn't help anybody.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421770 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:00 am to
well the concept of the universal/basic income is more of a replacement of what we have, which is a bunch of programs that indirectly give a universal/basic income. this isn't just welfare. things like military expenditures and other pork are part of the system

we're going to have some demographic issues in a few decades as long as technology continues to advance. THAT is when we'll have an issue
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
57843 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:01 am to
quote:

where there are still twice as many job seekers as job openings,


This isn't the message heard on the evening news.
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:03 am to
To control people, you have to give them something. Stability, environment, peace, money, hope all work to some degree.
Posted by 91TIGER
Lafayette
Member since Aug 2006
17690 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:03 am to
quote:

It blows my mind that people think this system works. Time and again, history has given us countless examples where it doesn't.


The communists know it doesn't work. They just have to dupe enough useful idiots into believing the lie. They've indoctrinated them in government schools and thru the media over the last 50 years. Truth about the failures of communism/socialism is not presented. Thus this lunacy seems plausible to the idiots.
Posted by goldennugget
Hating Masks
Member since Jul 2013
24514 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:04 am to
quote:

Thus this lunacy seems plausible to the idiots.


It's like when I was a kid my dad taught me a lesson. I wanted a toy or something and he said he didn't have any money for it. I asked him to go to the ATM and have it give him money like it always does.

That is the mentality of the left. They think money grows on trees.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28257 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:05 am to
As usual, progressives take a perceived problem and tout the most simplistic solution without any thought whatsoever as to how to rationally implement said plan of action or the adverse repercussions that would flow therefrom.

Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:07 am to
quote:


we're going to have some demographic issues in a few decades as long as technology continues to advance. THAT is when we'll have an issue


I agree.. the UBI is something that may become necessary as technology and automation advance past the need for the majority of jobs.. but we're not there yet and won't be for at least 20-30 years.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67692 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:10 am to
quote:

To control people, you have to give them something.


Yeah, millions of people with nothing to lose = Ferguson, MO.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421770 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:11 am to
quote:

the UBI is something that may become necessary as technology and automation advance past the need for the majority of jobs.. but we're not there yet and won't be for at least 20-30 years.

on the flip side, we could just start promoting a policy of emigration, which is my preferred model

as a state we need to start securing deals with countries NOW to allow for easier transition of our emigrating populations
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Thus this lunacy seems plausible to the idiots.


This pessimistic view totally ignores the fact about how the majority of those getting something for nothing will spontaneously transform into artists, musicians, and poets. Why do you guys hate culture?
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51488 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:20 am to
F
quote:

ree money for everyone!

With weak job growth, rising poverty, and the rich continuing to devour nearly all economic growth, it's an idea that is gaining more credence. Arguments for a universal basic income (UBI) — in which everyone without exception would receive an equal stipend — have flourished in policy-centric areas of the internet, including The Week. Advocates of UBI see it as a blunter, more effective means of reducing poverty and shrinking the inequality gap.


"Moronic" doesn't even begin to describe this.

Remove all income taxes. Charge businesses a 20% corporate tax if they compensate any employee more than 500% more than their least compensated employee. This makes "spreading the wealth" to the lower economic levels an attractive proposal to businesses without making the contrary so burdensome that they leave the country.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:27 am to
quote:

It blows my mind that people think this system works. Time and again, history has given us countless examples where it doesn't.


We also have most of human history to show us that consolidation of wealth and power among a relative few in a ruling class doesn't work.

When obesity is an epidemic, no one should starve. The problem is that when you set up programs to prevent people from starving, you end up creating and fostering dependency. I don't know of a solution to that problem, and I don't think anyone else does either.
Posted by Qwerty
Member since Dec 2010
2114 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:27 am to
This only benefits the government, not the people. This has nothing to do with giving people the means to live. The net effect towards buying power will be zero, at best. What it does do is give the government more control over our lives, because now everyone who receives this depends on it. What the government gives, the government can take away from whom it wishes.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51488 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:30 am to
quote:

When obesity is an epidemic, no one should starve. The problem is that when you set up programs to prevent people from starving, you end up creating and fostering dependency. I don't know of a solution to that problem, and I don't think anyone else does either.


In this case though, it's easy to see what the solution isn't. The solution isn't implementing a Minimum Wage v2.0 that can be used to basically buy votes every election. Want more money? Just vote for whoever is advocating raising the UBI.


Bad idea is terri-bad
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37034 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:31 am to
quote:

I agree.. the UBI is something that may become necessary as technology and automation advance past the need for the majority of jobs.. but we're not there yet and won't be for at least 20-30 years.


I don't know if I'm buying this. We've had technological innovations throghout history and we've never had this issue. As certain jobs become automated, new careers tend to pop up.

The problem isn't the number of available jobs. The problem is the people who are unemployed are not trained or are not willing or are not able to do the jobs that are available.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Want more money? Just vote for whoever is advocating raising the UBI


You just stated why we are never going to win an election again if we don't come up with real solutions that make sense to people conditioned by generations of dependency. And endless sermons about self reliance will not make a bit of difference.
Not that the media would fairly portray the solution if anyone came up with it.

But I said above that I don't know of a solution. That's true, but I know what I would try. Assistance would be given in ways that make the experience considerably less pleasant than the alternative. Food distribution centers doling out rice, beans, potatoes, soup, etc. Think of the solutions to hunger in the Great Depression. Those were not likely to make people want to be dependent for generations.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram