- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
article says LSU needs more depth at WR...lol
Posted on 9/3/14 at 11:46 am
Posted on 9/3/14 at 11:46 am
LINK
"Travin Dural is becoming one of the biggest home run threats in the SEC...
But the Tigers need more depth and impact players at receiver"
just going to leave this here, what a load of BS...
"Travin Dural is becoming one of the biggest home run threats in the SEC...
But the Tigers need more depth and impact players at receiver"
just going to leave this here, what a load of BS...
This post was edited on 9/3/14 at 11:46 am
Posted on 9/3/14 at 11:47 am to StormTiger
A misinformed article? NO WAY!
lulz.
*sarcasm directed at the writers of articles like this...not the OP
lulz.
*sarcasm directed at the writers of articles like this...not the OP
This post was edited on 9/3/14 at 11:48 am
Posted on 9/3/14 at 11:47 am to StormTiger
I guess they missed a few plays. Look to me like there are 3 playmakers in the receiving corps.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 11:48 am to tjohn deaux
And the most highly touted one ain't played yet.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 11:48 am to StormTiger
That's pretty ridiculous.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 11:50 am to SabiDojo
Uninformed ignoramus.....obviously didn't watch game at all.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 11:52 am to StormTiger
It's Saturday Down South, which is basically Bleacher Report for the SEC.
I wouldn't get too worked up about it. Nowadays, any a-hole with a keyboard and an internet connection can blast their "expert" opinion out to the masses.
I wouldn't get too worked up about it. Nowadays, any a-hole with a keyboard and an internet connection can blast their "expert" opinion out to the masses.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 12:08 pm to StormTiger
I read the article and what he said was spot on. What is wrong with some of you? Did you even take time to read the article. What part of what he said was inaccurate? Players that don't get on the field are not a threat. Fact!
Posted on 9/3/14 at 12:09 pm to StormTiger
Definitely BS
LSU has (imo) one of the deepest and most talented WR corps in the nation.
LSU has (imo) one of the deepest and most talented WR corps in the nation.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 12:11 pm to StormTiger
quote:
"Travin Dural is becoming one of the biggest home run threats in the SEC...
But the Tigers need more depth and impact players at receiver"
just going to leave this here, what a load of BS...
Where's that quote in the article? I didn't find it. Maybe the author edited that part out after you posted on TD? Did you read to the end? IMO the article is addressing the experience level of the receivers, not all that earth-shattering news but whatever.
Just funny how some of you half way read an article, then your imagination runs wild...
Ahhh, Football season is here!!!
FWIW here is the real quote...
quote:
Dural should continue to be the team’s home run threat and the unit’s anchor. Quinn and Diarse are good compliments. But the team needs other contributors. The next two weeks should present some great learning opportunities as the score gets out of hand.
This post was edited on 9/3/14 at 12:13 pm
Posted on 9/3/14 at 12:13 pm to StormTiger
quote:
True freshman D.J. Clark
There's some credibility.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 12:14 pm to StormTiger
Now John Diarse is going to eat the author's children. Sad story.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 12:18 pm to mooseofterror
quote:
Where's that quote in the article?
You do know that paraphrasing is required to be quoted, right?
Posted on 9/3/14 at 12:19 pm to StormTiger
The article doesn't say what your post quotes it as saying. Your quotes are phony. What the article says is that LSU needs to get more of its receiving corps into the game plan, and not focus so much on Dural. The article can be criticized for jumping to conclusions based on one game played in circumstances that (after LSU went down big) didn't permit experimentation. But it most certainly does NOT say that LSU needs more depth at the WR position.
LSU loyalty: 10
Reading comprehension: 0
LSU loyalty: 10
Reading comprehension: 0
Posted on 9/3/14 at 12:44 pm to StormTiger
Nothing wrong with article. Pretty spot on IMO. Some of you girls just like whining
Posted on 9/3/14 at 12:52 pm to rickyh
quote:agreed - the article didnt seem too off to me.
Posted by rickyh I read the article and what he said was spot on. What is wrong with some of you? Did you even take time to read the article. What part of what he said was inaccurate? Players that don't get on the field are not a threat. Fact!
Posted on 9/3/14 at 12:52 pm to StormTiger
Looks like to me the gist of article was that there is a lot of young talent at WR, not a lack of depth, which needs to be utilized.
That will come as the WRs get experience and as Jennings matures. It basically stated the obvious, and was not a negative piece. Really not a lot to disagree with.
That will come as the WRs get experience and as Jennings matures. It basically stated the obvious, and was not a negative piece. Really not a lot to disagree with.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News