- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Taxes on us companies that relocate abroad
Posted on 8/10/14 at 12:29 am
Posted on 8/10/14 at 12:29 am
Just to clear it up....these companies will still be taxed on all income derived in the us. All this talk about the horrors of companies relocating is just a scare tactic. That is all.
Posted on 8/10/14 at 12:57 am to BBONDS25
While I understand your premise, I have to play devils advocate and then ask why are they even relocating?
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:24 am to BBONDS25
quote:
derived in the us
If the corporate home office is located in the US are they taxed on all income even that made in foreign lands? If so then that is the reason for the move.
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:56 am to BOSCEAUX
Exactly. A us corp is taxed on their worldwide income at us corp tax rates. If they relocate, they are only taxed on income derived in the us. The dems are mad that the worldwide income may not be subject to to tax here at home.
Posted on 8/10/14 at 7:47 am to BBONDS25
quote:
If they relocate, they are only taxed on income derived in the us. The dems are mad that the worldwide income may not be subject to to tax here at home.
BUT WHO WILL BUILD THE ROADS AND BRIDGES GUYS
Posted on 8/10/14 at 8:18 am to 90proofprofessional
Why do we even have corporate taxes? They are stupid, and simply a deceptive practice to make people think that big, evil corporations are paying taxes for them so they won't have to.
Posted on 8/10/14 at 8:52 am to BBONDS25
quote:
.these companies will still be taxed on all income derived in the us.
Define "derived in the us"
This post was edited on 8/10/14 at 8:53 am
Posted on 8/10/14 at 9:01 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:....further proof of your stupidity.
Define "derived in the us"
Posted on 8/10/14 at 9:06 am to Jax-Tiger
quote:Wow. Tea Party I presume?
Why do we even have corporate taxes? They are stupid, and simply a deceptive practice to make people think that big, evil corporations are paying taxes for them so they won't have to.
Posted on 8/10/14 at 9:13 am to Jax-Tiger
quote:
Why do we even have corporate taxes? They are stupid, and simply a deceptive practice to make people think that big, evil corporations are paying taxes for them so they won't have to.
People pay taxes and corporations are people according to the supreme court. If a corporation has civil rights the same as a real person, should they not be taxed in the same manner as a real life breathing person?
Corporations are now free to invest millions into the body politic. It would be representation without taxation to let them off the hook.
This post was edited on 8/10/14 at 9:15 am
Posted on 8/10/14 at 9:28 am to Big12fan
quote:In terms of those political contributions, please differentiate for us the ramifications of drastically reduced corporate taxes vs maintaining the current rates, i.e., the highest corporate rates in the world. I'm curious as to the difference.
Corporations are now free to invest millions into the body politic. It would representation without taxation to let them off the hook.
The corporate tax equation basically comes down to (1) appearances vs (2) achievement.
(1) Keep up appearances -- tax hell out of evil companies, and run them off.
(2) Achieve tax revenue escalation thru increased employment and an improved economy by leaving those evil corporations alone to employ, improve, prosper, and return home.
Posted on 8/10/14 at 9:32 am to BBONDS25
LINK
I posted this earlier this week on another thread on this topic.
Amongst the adults in DC there is deep concern of the affects of Inversion.
This was a committee hearing led by Ron Wyden D, of Oregon. The ranking member is Orrin Hatch. Just listening to their opening remarks should illustrate the disadvantages the US faces by having a high corporate tax rate.
Instead of looking for a way to make the code more competitive, Obama and the Radicals of his party seek only to punish.
I posted this earlier this week on another thread on this topic.
Amongst the adults in DC there is deep concern of the affects of Inversion.
This was a committee hearing led by Ron Wyden D, of Oregon. The ranking member is Orrin Hatch. Just listening to their opening remarks should illustrate the disadvantages the US faces by having a high corporate tax rate.
Instead of looking for a way to make the code more competitive, Obama and the Radicals of his party seek only to punish.
Posted on 8/10/14 at 9:32 am to LSURussian
quote:k
quote:
Define "derived in the us"
....further proof of your stupidity.
Posted on 8/10/14 at 9:36 am to BBONDS25
One more example of how higher taxation ultimately cost revenue. As simple as it is, the dumbasses can't fully grasp it.
Posted on 8/10/14 at 9:36 am to BBONDS25
Step 1: 15% US tax rate. Step2: dont tax income
earned overseas. Step 3: never elect liberals again!
earned overseas. Step 3: never elect liberals again!
Posted on 8/10/14 at 9:39 am to KeyserSoze999
quote:
One more example of how higher taxation ultimately cost revenue. As simple as it is, the dumbasses can't fully grasp it.
No. We get it. To maximize corporate tax revenue we need to eliminate corporate taxes. Duh. That's why Ireland has the highest corporate tax revenue of any nation on the planet.
Posted on 8/10/14 at 9:40 am to SpidermanTUba
Yep, I said eliminate. Douche
Posted on 8/10/14 at 9:42 am to KeyserSoze999
quote:
Yep, I said eliminate.
You can't think of a single instance in which raising them is acceptable - the logical limit is thus zero.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News