Quality Headphone Recommendations

Sennheiser

quote:

---

Sennheiser

---

Any particular model(s)?

Bowers & Wilkins P7

phone/tablet/laptop mix. Maybe the occasianal Home theater reciever, but mostly on the go.

Sennheiser Momentum or HD 600 (open back, may be a dealbreaker for you), AT ATH-M50s will really fool you by competing at a much lower price tag than the others, Sony MDR1R are a very decent selection (noise cancelling version available for an extra $130 (side note: adding noise cancelling is usually ~$100 in addition to the cost of the comparable non-NC headphone, and it really doesn't add much to the sound)), and lastly the NAD VISO HP50

Your best bet for full, professional reviews is Innerfidelity. Your best bet for hyper-critical user reviews is probably head-fi.

Most of the above is what's in your price range from the Inner Fidelity Wall of Fame + the top rated over-ears from head-fi. I didn't pull any on-ears in, but it's easy enough to dig through the reviews yourself.

If it were me, I'd probably very critically be listening to the NAD vs Sennheiser Momentum and then really weigh if it's worth more than double the Audio Technica pair (~$120). Also, a very important thing to learn is that "brands" have a certain "sound," and no matter how expensive or high-end that brand gets, it still has the brand's characteristics in it. If you hate $300 Sennheisers, you'll probably hate $1500 Sennheisers. If you like $80 Logitech headphones, you'll probably enjoy their upper end ones, too. So with brand/sound preference in mind and realizing that it's my own personal preference, I'll also toss the b&w p5 and p7 into the list, but I'll admit that I don't like particularly the way they look. When it comes to looks alone, I think the AT or Sennheiser Momentums win out.

Other things to pay attention to that you may not think about:
Presence or absence of detachable cord
Cord length (if not detachable)
coil vs straight
Presence of memory foam on ear covers
Reviews of how big-eared or small-headed (or vice versa) people like the fit

headphone with b logo on it. Lebron James and other celebrities wear it. it's pure marketing genius and it dominates headphone industry market share while having zero substance.

quote:

---

headphone with b logo on it.

---

Pretty much decided I would never wear them, but thought I'd at least try them out. They had a "studio" pair that were all black, no frills, that I could possibly make an exception for, but still... there freakin beats, right?. Sounded ok, honestly. Like I said before, mainly just loud as hell. I'm no audiophile, but I do enjoy all the details of music.

I guess I hit on it without explaining, too, but "open back" vs "closed back." Closed back is going to give much more of the noise-cancelling aspect you want and sound like what most people think of when they think of headphones in general. Open back ones don't really do this. You can hear what's going on around you quite easily, and people around you can hear what you're listening to quite easily. It's much more akin to having speakers sit really close to your ear than having headphones. Based on your NC request and wanting to use these "on the go", it's probably a poor choice. You also mentioned using them "on the go" a bit, so be sure you look at how these things fold up, whether they come with any sort of protective carrying case (and some high-end ones come with large, wooden, lined cases that would be wildly impractical to travel around town with...so pay attention to WHAT kind of case/bag it has, not just the presence of one), and what their ability to stand up to the kind of use you are expecting from them.

I'd love to get my hands on those 800 series. WAY out of the price range though obviously.

I was reading a little about that just now. You're right, closed back is definietly the route I need to go. Great point about the portability too, although it would mainly be airplanes and cars or something with light activity. Certainly wont be jogging in these.