- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Damn...Archer was there...
Posted on 5/9/14 at 8:07 pm
Posted on 5/9/14 at 8:07 pm
But it would have been a total impulse pick.
Oh well. We needed a CB more.
Welcome SJB!
Oh well. We needed a CB more.
Welcome SJB!
6
Posted on 5/9/14 at 8:08 pm to TXGunslinger10
Way too early
Posted on 5/9/14 at 8:10 pm to fightingtigers98
Archer might be there in the 5th or 6th
Posted on 5/9/14 at 8:12 pm to TthomasJR
I don't know about that.
Isn't he the best RB available?
Isn't he the best RB available?
Posted on 5/9/14 at 8:13 pm to TXGunslinger10
No
Posted on 5/9/14 at 8:16 pm to TthomasJR
Tre Mason
The guy from BC
The guy from Towson
All should go before him.
The guy from BC
The guy from Towson
All should go before him.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:17 pm to TXGunslinger10
Strong 1,000,088th post
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:29 pm to TXGunslinger10
I don't think Archer was ever in the mix at #2. If he's there when we pick in the 4th, he might be the pick. Pick up Storks with one 5th and a OLB with the other (however,starting to think they might use one of the 5th round picks to move up in the 4th).
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:35 pm to TXGunslinger10
And Archer is still there.... 
Why take him in the 2nd? Cooks is gonna be used all over the field.
Why take him in the 2nd? Cooks is gonna be used all over the field.
This post was edited on 5/9/14 at 9:36 pm
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:38 pm to TXGunslinger10
Archer is a 4th rounder or late 3rd at best.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:40 pm to bonethug0108
I musta been mistaken. I thought I saw Archer at 4th best available behind Hyde, Hill and Sankey
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:42 pm to TXGunslinger10
Different people have different rankings. He's really not the same type of back though.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:42 pm to fightingtigers98
Yeah, way too early. I'd love to get him in the 4th, but I don't think he last until our pick.
Imagine Stills and Cook out wide, Jimmy in the slot, Hill/Watson on the line and Archer motioning out of the backfield. Matchup nightmares!!!
Imagine Stills and Cook out wide, Jimmy in the slot, Hill/Watson on the line and Archer motioning out of the backfield. Matchup nightmares!!!
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:44 pm to Suntiger
I've seen him listed as WR more than I've seen him listed as RB.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:45 pm to lsutigers1992
Right. He's sorta that in between like a Sproles and a McCluster. You can feed him occasional carries but he's best in the passing game.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:51 pm to TXGunslinger10
What is this board's obsession with Dri Archer?
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:52 pm to xxKylexx
He's just a playmaker...A STR8 BALLER!...And a possible replacement for Darren Sproles.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:55 pm to xxKylexx
quote:
What is this board's obsession with Dri Archer?
Everyone thinks he'd be a good replacement for Sproles.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:58 pm to Suntiger
Got a lot of Al Davises in here.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 10:12 pm to TXGunslinger10
quote:
Isn't he the best RB available?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News