Started By
Message

re: Getting solar panels today!!

Posted on 5/25/14 at 7:36 am to
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
36791 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 7:36 am to
no offense, but go take a pic from the street and we'll discuss the aesthetic value of the panels. The angle you present is as flattering as you can get. Kind of the same way Kate Upton can appear thin

FWIW, my 3000'SQFT home has a good old heat pump and my utility bill has NEVER exceeded $110.00. Our thermostat never goes above 73 in summer or below 71 in the winter. I got no problem with solar panels, just wouldn't be my choice.
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28207 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 8:06 am to
Sho, thanks for that info.

After spending a ton of money on new construction and roofing, my concern was roof penetrations.

That system looks pretty good for asphalt shingles.
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
17484 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 8:11 am to
Congrats.
Has anyone figured costs when utilty rates increase over time?
Posted by oldcharlie8
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2012
7808 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 8:15 am to
the more people that get solar panels, the more chance that the "base" rate will jump from 31.00 to 100.00 per month.

Posted by sec13rowBBseat28
St George, LA
Member since Aug 2006
15379 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 8:38 am to
I spent $8K after Hurricane Katrina to have a generator put on my house. I've always said since then that I would never live without a standby generator. This sounds like a much cheaper alternative to wanting a generator.
Posted by SadSouthernBuck
Las Vegas
Member since Dec 2007
748 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Considering the average American doesn't live in the same house this long, I can't see how this is a wise investment.


There was a study in California that found that owners recouped up to 97% of the installation cost through increased home value. This was before any monthly savings on their utility bills. By comparison, homeowners that upgraded their kitchen only recouped 60% of the cost through increased home value.
Posted by LSUSUPERSTAR
TX
Member since Jan 2005
16320 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 9:52 am to
Anyone have info about tax credits for Texas?
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 10:07 am to
Does anyone else find it curious that the price of a system in Louisiana just happens to coincide with the maximum expense allowed to qualify for the tax credit? The price hasn't changed for several years despite changes in costs of electricity that should alter the demand for the systems. You would think some enterprising company would be able to install a system for less than the maximum cost and undercut the competition. Somehow that hasn't happened.
Posted by BuckeyeFan87
Columbus
Member since Dec 2007
25239 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 10:29 am to
The solar shingles look the best from what I've seen, but I assume they're more expensive and possibly less effective than solar panels.





Or what I'm assuming is solar film would look great on a metal roof.

This post was edited on 5/25/14 at 10:39 am
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56564 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 10:38 am to
quote:

So "terrible


That actually is terrible.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42571 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 10:43 am to
Yeah, I don't understand the hate. I mean, dumbass people spend 45k on a f-150 fx4 to drive to work in, and in 10 years it's worth 7k. I think being less reliant on big brother is a good thing, and it seems most cases people break even on solar panels with the tax breaks.
Posted by Geauxtiga
No man's land
Member since Jan 2008
34377 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 10:44 am to
quote:

I spent $8K after Hurricane Katrina to have a generator put on my house. I've always said since then that I would never live without a standby generator. This sounds like a much cheaper alternative to wanting a generator.
You're better off with the generator. You can't store energy with this system. If the electricity goes out, it's out. With a generator, you'll have juice.
Posted by saderade
America's City
Member since Jul 2005
25741 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 10:46 am to
quote:

That actually is terrible.
I agree it looks pretty bad. The shingle panels that were posted above me aren't so terrible.
Posted by League Champs
Bayou Self
Member since Oct 2012
10340 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

I think being less reliant on big brother is a good thing, and it seems most cases people break even on solar panels with the tax breaks.

Do people even think before they post?

You rail against big brother, then praise him for his tax credits??

Most people wouldnt even touch solar panels if not for govt involvement. And when that money runs out, La will be littered with unattractive overpriced houses because no one can afford to replace their roof panels
Posted by Sho Nuff
Oahu
Member since Feb 2009
11923 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

No offense, but go take a pic from the street

I did take them from the street, you think I was on a professional crane or dolly?
Posted by Sho Nuff
Oahu
Member since Feb 2009
11923 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 4:09 pm to
Those are not efficient enough yet. They will likely get there at some point, but they do look pretty cool. As of now, you have to use a lot more of them to do the same as traditional panels.
Posted by Sho Nuff
Oahu
Member since Feb 2009
11923 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

That actually is terrible.

And yet, people with multi million dollar homes and brains are getting them all over the world. As I mentioned above, you keep on paying full price for your electricity, they appreciate you
This post was edited on 5/25/14 at 4:13 pm
Posted by Sho Nuff
Oahu
Member since Feb 2009
11923 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

La will be littered with unattractive overpriced houses because no one can afford to replace their roof panels

Sounds like you have a problem with people who have money

As far as when it comes time to replace the panels in 30+ years, if they can't afford to get the new technology at that time, they simply remove the panels from their house. You think they have to leave them on?

Eta: if they have good panels, they will still be producing at about 80% in 30 years. In other words, they will be working for a very long time for some of you mouth breathers.
This post was edited on 5/25/14 at 4:20 pm
Posted by sprime1
lafayette
Member since May 2008
40 posts
Posted on 5/27/14 at 5:39 pm to
In response to almost everyone, you also have to take into account the price of fuel inflation every year.

My solar panel system research/analysis ended up in me making an excel spreadsheet to show me my anticipated savings over X amount of years.

I used 24,000 KWH of electricity total last year, so about 2,000 KWH per month, costing about $0.10 per KWH, so a normal $200.00 per month for energy.

Purchase a $25,000 solar system, that produces an average 7 KWH per hour, for about 4.5 hours a day(based on historical weather data in louisiana) for a total of 31.5 KWH per day produced. Multiply by 30 equals 945 KWH produced in a month, which is basically cutting your energy bill in half. Just with these numbers you'll pay off your $5,000 out of pocket within 50 months, plus or minus a few months.

Now, when you take into count that energy fuel prices rise 3-4% per year, I'll be paying and additional $1,000.00 in 6 years for my current energy consumption, without solar panels.

I can post additional numbers, maybe even the spreadsheet I created when I get back to the office tomorrow for everyone to see the math, and you can input your own numbers.
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
103107 posts
Posted on 5/27/14 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

$15000 grand

Holy crap!!
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram