Started By
Message

FFP - Man City and PSG Punishment

Posted on 5/6/14 at 5:46 am
Posted by engvol
england
Member since Sep 2009
5058 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 5:46 am
LINK

Sky sources understand the fine will be payable over three years and the team will have to freeze their Champions League spending.


Obviously this is being challenged but still, nice to see an actual punishment for once.

The main thing being that they can only have 13 non locally trained players.


UPDATE:

60 million euros - 40m suspended, 21 player cap
PSG -> 60M Euros, 21 player cap for the CL.
This post was edited on 5/16/14 at 2:04 pm
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125419 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 6:09 am to
I was waiting for this to come down to post it

I guess City could not come to an agreement with FFP

quote:

The main thing being that they can only have 13 non locally trained players.



We will see how their youth system which they have dumped tons of money into pays off. They have actually been decent. If City didn't pour loads of money into their academy this would have been even worse.
This post was edited on 5/6/14 at 8:11 am
Posted by Ryne Sandberg
Team Am Mart
Member since Apr 2009
19368 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 7:45 am to
Oh European socialism at its worst...
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84879 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 7:49 am to
quote:

nice to see an actual punishment for once.


FFP is a rich get richer scam
Posted by BlueMoon
Chapel Hill, NC
Member since Aug 2007
1429 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 7:59 am to
Spend money (debt free) on your club and its infrastructure: €60M fine.
Racially abuse players: €10K fine (or maybe just a warning).
UEFA!!!
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84879 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:02 am to
quote:

Spend money (debt free)


yeah I could understand rules against adding a crazy amount of debt to a club, but then again this was never about controlling that, it was about preventing competition for the european blue bloods.
This post was edited on 5/6/14 at 8:05 am
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125419 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:06 am to
quote:

FFP is a rich get richer scam



no its not

stop trying to play victim. Newcastle could thrive under FFP and wouldn't need oil money dumped into it. Decent youth set up and big time stadium help out.
This post was edited on 5/6/14 at 8:08 am
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125419 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:07 am to
quote:

Spend money (debt free) on your club and its infrastructure: €60M fine.


no no the 50 million pounds was a write off you guys still took huge losses.

Its time for your academy to put up or shut up, other than the youth system investments which have been amazing along with facilities.

Man City has been trying to loop hole this entire thing. Adding seats that won't be used to add to "potential" revenue and shady sponsorship deals.
This post was edited on 5/6/14 at 8:17 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422808 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:20 am to
quote:

you guys still took huge losses.

but they're still "debt free"

quote:

Its time for your academy to put up or shut up,

show me a major team competing in the CL who relies primarily on their academy other than Barca (who is an extreme historical outlier, even for Barca)

and Man City just started investing in their academy. they'll possibly see results...in 5-10 years, and that's a crap shoot. don't place irrational expectations upon them and act like it's some normal standard

quote:

Man City has been trying to loop hole this entire thing.

of course they have. these rules basically make it impossible for a team like Man City to compete with the major teams

that's the point of FFP. if you were an established mega club at the inception of FFP, you are protected. any other club who wants to spend money to close the gap will be punished, preventing htem from making it to that level
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84879 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:21 am to
quote:

no its not


Says the ManU fan

quote:

Newcastle could thrive under FFP and wouldn't need oil money dumped into it. Decent youth set up and big time stadium help out.


Unlike you, my opinion on FFP is completely seperate from my fan affiliation.
Posted by BlueMoon
Chapel Hill, NC
Member since Aug 2007
1429 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:21 am to
quote:

Its time for your academy to put up or shut up

Our Academy is suplying a ton of 1st team players. . .





. . . (for Burnley, Birmingham, Leicster, QPR, Hibs, etc.)
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125419 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:23 am to
quote:

Says the ManU fan


Sorry but clubs like Man United and Liverpool were not built on rampant uncontrolled spending.

quote:

Unlike you, my opinion on FFP is completely seperate from my fan affiliation.




Neither does mine. B/c it doesn't affect my club b/c my club does not spend out of control and when it does spend it covers it losses.

This is to keep teams from going under like a Leeds United but you have not been a fan long enough to actually have seen things like this happen.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125419 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:24 am to
quote:

Our Academy is suplying a ton of 1st team players. . .





. . . (for Burnley, Birmingham, Leicster, QPR, Hibs, etc.)



Welcome to the club

The model works. If they can't crack your first team, loan them out or sell them.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125419 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:28 am to
quote:

but they're still "debt free"


Due to shirt and stadium deals with their owner, thats not how it works

quote:

show me a major team competing in the CL who relies primarily on their academy other than Barca (who is an extreme historical outlier, even for Barca)


Its how lots of clubs are built

quote:

and Man City just started investing in their academy. they'll possibly see results...in 5-10 years, and that's a crap shoot. don't place irrational expectations upon them and act like it's some normal standard



shite should be less than that, their U-21 made it to the EPL semi's. With the other big boys.

quote:

of course they have. these rules basically make it impossible for a team like Man City to compete with the major teams


Chelsea was not breaking FFP rules

quote:

that's the point of FFP. if you were an established mega club at the inception of FFP, you are protected. any other club who wants to spend money to close the gap will be punished, preventing htem from making it to that level



City has been at this since 2008 but only the last two years count against them. Clearly they don't care and a 50 million fine is a drop in the bucket to them.

FFP forces teams to spend responsibly and build infrastructure if they want to become a mega club.

There have been so many cases of clubs who are ruined do to out of control spending.
Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
28264 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:36 am to
Well this won't drive up prices for English players or anything.
Posted by BlueMoon
Chapel Hill, NC
Member since Aug 2007
1429 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:37 am to
quote:

Well this won't drive up prices for English players or anything.

City can pay their fine by selling Micah Richards.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84879 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Sorry but clubs like Man United and Liverpool were not built on rampant uncontrolled spending.


Those clubs became powers in a very very different world and today they have revenue streams that dwarf most other clubs. After a decade of spending their way into that group, Chelsea is just now starting to enjoy the same thing. A club today would not be allowed to join the club though because of these new rules.

You already knew all of this though, you're just being intellectually dishonest.

quote:

Neither does mine


bullshite. FFP means less completion for ManU, pure and simple.

quote:

This is to keep teams from going under like a Leeds United


Leeds' issue was debt driven, which nobody has a problem with making rules to prevent. Continuing to hide behind this flawed example shows just how full of shite you are.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:44 am to
quote:

This is to keep teams from going under like a Leeds United

I just can't understand this line of thinking. Why shouldn't a club be able to spend however it wants? Is someone else picking up the tab for Leeds failing?

quote:

Sorry but clubs like Man United and Liverpool were not built on rampant uncontrolled spending.

What difference does it make? Why should busybodies get to decide the "right" way to build a club?
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125419 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Those clubs became powers in a very very different world and today they have revenue streams that dwarf most other clubs. After a decade of spending their way into that group, Chelsea is just now starting to enjoy the same thing. A club today would not be allowed to join the club though because of these new rules.

You already knew all of this though, you're just being intellectually dishonest.



Um City has been doing it since 2008 and got away with it no problem except the last two years. Them and PSG had plenty of time to catch up.

quote:

bullshite. FFP means less completion for ManU, pure and simple.


We all play by the same rules. Sponsorship deals, players bought and sold, tickets and euro competitions.

quote:

Leeds' issue was debt driven, which nobody has a problem with making rules to prevent. Continuing to hide behind this flawed example shows just how full of shite you are.



They went in debt b/c of crazy spending spree
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125419 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:50 am to
quote:

What difference does it make? Why should busybodies get to decide the "right" way to build a club?




B/c how alot of these clubs tie into local european communities, which many on this board don't understand. This isn't like the american franchise model.

When these teams go under of hell even get relegated it has a negative impact on the city and its economy.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram