Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Crawfish pot size and how much it fits

Posted on 4/15/14 at 7:47 pm
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38259 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 7:47 pm
So....gimme the lowdown.

What size do you guys have and how much does it fit?

I just got an 80 QT as my first one. I'm assuming that will fit at least a sack with room for corn, potatoes, sausage etc.
Posted by OTIS2
NoLA
Member since Jul 2008
50140 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 7:52 pm to
It'll do a large sack with all the extras, easily.
Posted by JonTheTigerFan
Central, LA
Member since Nov 2003
6784 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 8:39 pm to
I have a 60 that will barely do a small sack plus trimmings. It's actually too close for comfort. The 80 is perfect for a sack at a time.
Posted by MNCscripper
St. George
Member since Jan 2004
11709 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:00 pm to
I got 100 qt, no worries
Posted by Stadium Rat
Metairie
Member since Jul 2004
9567 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:07 pm to
Ratio guy here. Multiply the quarts of the pot size by .6 and that will tell you how many pounds with fixings you can cook. A 100 quart would be ideal.
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38259 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:14 pm to
So...with that tactic id be looking at about 48lbs. That sounds about perfect for a sack with the extras to me.
Posted by Geauxtiga
No man's land
Member since Jan 2008
34377 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

So...with that tactic id be looking at about 48lbs. That sounds about perfect for a sack with the extras to me.
If a sack holds more than 32 lbs you're getting towards peeler size. The bigger the crawfish the less lbs per sack.
Posted by bigberg2000
houston, from chalmette
Member since Sep 2005
70039 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:45 pm to
I did a 34# sack on Sunday with an 80 qt. pot. Had potatoes, corn, sausage, lemons, onions, garlic and it fir fine.
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38259 posts
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:48 pm to
Thanks guys, I think I'll be sticking with the 80 QT
Posted by CHEDBALLZ
South Central LA
Member since Dec 2009
21934 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 5:31 am to
I rather a larger pot....... they seem to come back to a boil quicker.

But an 80qt will boil a sack just fine.
Posted by Motorboat
At the camp
Member since Oct 2007
22687 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 7:58 am to
Get a 120 qt pot and be done with it. You can boil 2 sacks at a time and work less/eat more.
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38259 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 8:03 am to
I'm not completely opposed to that, but I've also never boiled myself before. I don't plan on having huge get togethers in that regard, possibly just having a few people over to taste test. Not saying I won't ever need to boil two sacks and I'll surely be able to upgrade later, I just feel like that much would be excessive to start with.
Posted by CITWTT
baton rouge
Member since Sep 2005
31765 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 8:29 am to
I say this every time this is brought up in a thread. Buy the biggest you can afford when you go to buy one. You can boil smaller amounts in it when it comes to it, but you can't buy a pot extender when you have need for a bigger one for production purposes.
Posted by pooponsaban
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2008
13494 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 8:43 am to
How is it excessive? Seems logical to me. I'm usually just boiling one sack but I can use more water and keep the temp higher with my big pot. And when I want to throw in two I have room. I see no advantage or reason to go small.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram