Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Almost the time of the year to talk about the FairTax

Posted on 4/7/14 at 11:46 am
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 11:46 am
Annual discussion of the idea that would be the single biggest transfer of power from the government to the people that is completely dead on arrival in Washington, DC.

FairTax = national sales tax that replaces income tax



This post was edited on 4/7/14 at 11:50 am
Posted by ironsides
Nashville, TN
Member since May 2006
8153 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 12:07 pm to
Meh, fair tax unfairly punishes people that spend money and keep the economy going.

If someone makes $130K currently, and paid out $37k in income and property taxes, and then spent every dollar I would pay an additional $8.5K in sales taxes in a place that has 10% sales tax.

In order for the government to collect the same amount of money, they'd need to raise that sales tax to 53%.

Why wouldn't I just buy everything in cash and not pay the government anything in that case?

Posted by wickowick
Head of Island
Member since Dec 2006
45797 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

In order for the government to collect the same amount of money, they'd need to raise that sales tax to 53%.


Link...
Posted by dcrews
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2011
30164 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Why wouldn't I just buy everything in cash and not pay the government anything in that case?


Maybe I'm just misreading something, but if there is a national sales tax, how would paying cash help you avoid it?
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112417 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Why wouldn't I just buy everything in cash and not pay the government anything in that case?


You don't understand the Fair Tax.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

FairTax = national sales tax that replaces income tax

Wouldn't that inhibit spending?
Posted by ironsides
Nashville, TN
Member since May 2006
8153 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

You don't understand the Fair Tax.


Maybe I don't. How is it different from a typical sales tax then?

I mean if I want to buy a car from you, what's to stop me from paying you $20K in cash and have neither party record the transaction at actual value instead of paying $30K in cash and you paying the government $10K?

Posted by DaGarun
Smashville
Member since Nov 2007
26184 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

I mean if I want to buy a car from you, what's to stop me from paying you $20K in cash and have neither party record the transaction at actual value instead of paying $30K in cash and you paying the government $10K?

Nothing. But no tax is collected on used goods under the Fair Tax proposals I've seen
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112417 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

I mean if I want to buy a car from you, what's to stop me from paying you $20K in cash and have neither party record the transaction at actual value instead of paying $30K in cash and you paying the government $10K?


That would be fraud. Fraud already occurs in the status quo. When I built my house I paid subcontractors in cash. If they didn't report it on their taxes that's their problem, not mine.
Posted by Mahootney
Lovin' My German Footprint
Member since Sep 2008
11872 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:50 pm to
In either system, the taxes are gonna be too damn high. Our gov will raise taxes in any system to try and sustain its grown.
Posted by ironsides
Nashville, TN
Member since May 2006
8153 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

That would be fraud. Fraud already occurs in the status quo.


I just don't see how you would be able to set up such a system without increasing the amount of fraud.

That being said, how would it apply to buying and selling shares of companies on the stock market?

Has there ever been such a society set up?
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

Meh, fair tax unfairly punishes people that spend money and keep the economy going.



Actually, it would force lots of current deadbeats to finally start paying into the system.

quote:

If someone makes $130K currently, and paid out $37k in income and property taxes, and then spent every dollar I would pay an additional $8.5K in sales taxes in a place that has 10% sales tax.



I don't think you are considering the embedded income taxes in items for sale currently.

Price of item = $100
Embedded income tax = X
True price = 100-X
FairTax = Y
Y=X
FairTax cost of item = (100-X)+Y = $100

quote:

Why wouldn't I just buy everything in cash and not pay the government anything in that case?



Cash won't get around the FairTax. The plan actually brings the 'cash only' people into the tax pool.
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 6:40 pm to
quote:

That being said, how would it apply to buying and selling shares of companies on the stock market?




quote:

1. Many, if not most, people have money invested in the stock market. What will be the impact of the FairTax on the stock market and their investments?
First, it should be noted that not even the smartest minds in the country can predict the behavior of the stock market with any consistancy, but general rules and treands are usually accurate, so we'll use those and focus just on corporate stocks in this FAQ. We'll address corporate and municipal bonds under a different FAQ.
A corporate stock represents a partial ownership in a corporation, and the value of that stock is a function of many different variables. First off, will the company grow and increase in value, or will it lose market share, shrink, and decrease in value. In addition, is the company likely to share it's earnings with investors, in the form of dividends, over the coming years, or does the company have a history of putting those earnings to work in growing the company.
Interest rates also play a major role in the value of stocks in a very complicated manner. When an investor uses their money to purchase a company's stock, he loses the use of that money, which has a cost associated with it, often referred to as the "time-value of money". For instance, if an investor spends $1,000 on company stock, he loses all the interest that his $1,000 would have earned if he had just kep the money and put it into a savings account. The higher the interest rate, the more interest he loses by making the stock purchase, and the greater the time-value of the money.
What this means is that when an investor purchases company stock, he discounts what he thinks he'll get back in the future by the amount of interest he thinks he'll lose by making the purchase.
Let's work an example. If an investor thinks one share of corporate stock will be worth $1,000 five years in the future, and he doesn't think the company will be issuing any dividends during that time, what is the most he will be willing to pay for it. If we assume an interest rate of 5% for the intervening five years, the most our investor will be will pay is about $784. This is because if he puts his $784 in the bank and earns 5% interest, he will make about $216 over the five year period. Looking at it another way, our investor has to be able to buy the stock for less than $784 in order to make any money.
If our investor thinks the interest rate will be lower over the five year period, say 3%, then he can afford to pay a bit more for the stock and still make money because his potential interest is less. For example, in order to get the same $1,000 in five years, our investor would break even if he invested $863 in the company stock.


More info
This post was edited on 4/7/14 at 6:42 pm
Posted by Cold Cous Cous
Bucktown, La.
Member since Oct 2003
15043 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 6:47 pm to
Hell, it must be the best way to go - it's got the word "Fair" right in the title!
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 6:48 pm to
Why even talk about it? It has zero chance of ever getting off the ground and is a total waste of time. I did my thesis on it a decadeago for my masters. It was obvious then it was a non-starter.
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

Why even talk about it? It has zero chance of ever getting off the ground and is a total waste of time. I did my thesis on it a decadeago for my masters. It was obvious then it was a non-starter.



Hope springs eternal? Only way it happens is through massive grassroots but too many people are in the dark or apathetic.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 6:56 pm to
Yeah, sorry if I was rude. I just had to spend an inordinant amount of time on the flat or fair tax and write a paper and give a presentation on it followed up by a PhD grilling me on the position I took that it would never happen in the U.S.

Trust me, not happening in the U.S. Ever.
Posted by Iowa Golfer
Heaven
Member since Dec 2013
10229 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 6:56 pm to
I favor an unfair tax. This tax would be very favorable to some selected persons. An example would be me. It would be possibly fair, or possibly unfair to everyone else. I also think I should be the only person with the right to vote, and that the majority of the income tax burden should be placed on the poor as motivation for them to become not poor.

Who's on board?
Posted by bamafan1001
Member since Jun 2011
15783 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 8:00 pm to
If GOP wins Senate, I hope there is a legit push for it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram