- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is the Harden trade an all time top 5 worst trade?
Posted on 11/5/13 at 6:02 pm
Posted on 11/5/13 at 6:02 pm
Dont buy the salary cap BS, OKC could have made it work. Owners were being cheap.
Posted on 11/5/13 at 6:03 pm to Cosmo
Let's see how steven adams pans out
Posted on 11/5/13 at 6:03 pm to Cosmo
They need to amnesty Perkins and give money to Harden over Ibaka. Not sure it could have been done, but there may have a way to do it.
Just remember OKC fans, they wanted to keep Perkins.
Just remember OKC fans, they wanted to keep Perkins.
Posted on 11/5/13 at 6:04 pm to Cosmo
People thought the Pau Gasol/Marc Gasol trade was one of the worst ever, so I am gonna reserve judgment for another season or two
Posted on 11/5/13 at 6:05 pm to RTR America
That trade worked great for both teams. The Lakers got two titles. The Grizz got a pretty good younger brother.
Posted on 11/5/13 at 6:05 pm to Cosmo
Yeah, how could the Rockets trade Kevin Martin and all those draft picks for a bench player who disappeared in the Finals? Morey is an idiot.
Posted on 11/5/13 at 6:06 pm to MrBlue105
quote:
Let's see how steven adams pans out
Lolololololololololol
It is one of the worst ever, for sure. Funny thing is, the MSB for the most part crushed the Rockets for the trade. I was loosing my shite and baffled how people thought OKC won the trade. I have bumped the thread a few times for a laugh but it's locked now.
Ultimate Hog has stayed out of NBA threads all together since midway through last season when Harden was averaging 25 ppg.
Posted on 11/5/13 at 6:08 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
quote:
That trade worked great for both teams. The Lakers got two titles. The Grizz got a pretty good younger brother.
But that wasn't the story at the time. The first 2 or 3 years after that trade it seemed like the Grizzlies gave up Pau for nothing.
#4 on all-time worst trade list
Posted on 11/5/13 at 6:08 pm to Cosmo
It's unbelievable that they didn't just amnesty Perkins and replace him with a Robin Lopez or Jermaine O'Neal type of player.
They'd have made up the luxury tax in one playoff series alone, and would have realized sheer profits when it comes to NBA Finals, merchandise, media deals, etc.
They'd have made up the luxury tax in one playoff series alone, and would have realized sheer profits when it comes to NBA Finals, merchandise, media deals, etc.
Posted on 11/5/13 at 6:10 pm to LasVegasBandit
Simmons was saying today the Harden trade will result in like $10 million extra profit for the OKC owners.
This post was edited on 11/5/13 at 6:11 pm
Posted on 11/5/13 at 6:13 pm to RTR America
OKC could of def made it work. But doesnt mean that would of been the right move.
Hardens a stud. No doubt. But he doesnt really bring much to the table that OKC doesnt have already. Hes a great perimeter scorer. But OKC has Durant and Westbrook. Only so many shots to go around.
And I get why they gave the $$$ to Ibaka and not to Harden. Ibaka has a very unique set of skills for any team. But especially for OKC. Hardens set of skills were that of KD and Westbrook. And OKC already doesnt have that many good bigs on their team. Imagine how bad they would be without Ibaka. Especially on D.
Ibaka brings something to OKC that they really really needed and is a rare talent, while Hardens talent was something that OKC had in 2 players in KD and Westbrook.
They should of amnestied Perkins and paid Harden, and Ibaka. But, if it came down to keeping Ibaka or Harden, I understand why they kept Ibaka over him. Not saying Ibaka is a better player than Harden or whatever, but he brings something to the OKC team that they lacked and sorely needed.
Hardens a stud. No doubt. But he doesnt really bring much to the table that OKC doesnt have already. Hes a great perimeter scorer. But OKC has Durant and Westbrook. Only so many shots to go around.
And I get why they gave the $$$ to Ibaka and not to Harden. Ibaka has a very unique set of skills for any team. But especially for OKC. Hardens set of skills were that of KD and Westbrook. And OKC already doesnt have that many good bigs on their team. Imagine how bad they would be without Ibaka. Especially on D.
Ibaka brings something to OKC that they really really needed and is a rare talent, while Hardens talent was something that OKC had in 2 players in KD and Westbrook.
They should of amnestied Perkins and paid Harden, and Ibaka. But, if it came down to keeping Ibaka or Harden, I understand why they kept Ibaka over him. Not saying Ibaka is a better player than Harden or whatever, but he brings something to the OKC team that they lacked and sorely needed.
This post was edited on 11/5/13 at 6:16 pm
Posted on 11/5/13 at 6:14 pm to Cosmo
lol at OKC for not even starting Harden
Posted on 11/5/13 at 6:16 pm to KG5989
I think they would be worse with no Ibaka, but still having Harden.
Posted on 11/5/13 at 6:16 pm to KG5989
You can say Ibaka is special all you want. But last year he was a 12/8 player making a shite ton of money. Really special.
Posted on 11/5/13 at 6:19 pm to RTR America
quote:
I think they would be worse with no Ibaka, but still having Harden.
Yep I agree 100%.
And they dont start because of defensive reasons. If they would have started Harden there starters would of been Westbrook (6'4" , Harden (6'4) and KD(6'10). None of those guys can guard a good 3 guard. Thabo is 1 of the best defenders in the league. And 1 of the most important things for an NBA team to have is a stud 6th man that can score when the starters are resting. Look at Manu, Jamal Crawford, etc.
Posted on 11/5/13 at 6:20 pm to Cosmo
quote:
You can say Ibaka is special all you want. But last year he was a 12/8 player making a shite ton of money. Really special.
You don't include his ability to guard the paint there though. The Thunder get destroyed in the western conference playoffs with no front court presence. They led the league in offensive efficiency last year. They don't need Harden to be anymore successful than they already are. I think if Lamb doesn't develop letting Martin go was a mistake though.
Posted on 11/5/13 at 6:21 pm to RTR America
quote:
The first 2 or 3 years after that trade it seemed like the Grizzlies gave up Pau for nothing.
a. at the time, pau was seen as a guy who didn't deserve to make the all-star game
b. it cleared up their cap. you trade a good, expensive player for cap relief, a young player or 2, and picks. the grizz got all of those. crit didn't pan out, but mark gasol did. plus the cap space allowed them to trade for z-bo, when he was dumped
Posted on 11/5/13 at 6:21 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
quote:
Just remember OKC fans, they wanted to keep Perkins.
"But he's one of the best screeners in the NBA" - okietiger
Posted on 11/5/13 at 6:24 pm to Cosmo
Sure his offensive stats arent great. He is playing with KD and Westbrook.
But do you really think they signed Ibaka for his offensive game?? Nope. They signed him for his D and his 3.7 blocks a game. And when he doesnt block the shot, he alters it and forces a miss shot.
People also forget Ibaka is just 24 years old, and has only played basketball for 9 years. Hes just beginning to scratch the surface of his basketball ability. You dont sign a young guy to a big deal for the player he is. You sign him for the player hes going to become.
But do you really think they signed Ibaka for his offensive game?? Nope. They signed him for his D and his 3.7 blocks a game. And when he doesnt block the shot, he alters it and forces a miss shot.
People also forget Ibaka is just 24 years old, and has only played basketball for 9 years. Hes just beginning to scratch the surface of his basketball ability. You dont sign a young guy to a big deal for the player he is. You sign him for the player hes going to become.
This post was edited on 11/5/13 at 6:26 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News