Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Battlefield 4 PC Requirements

Posted on 9/10/13 at 1:05 pm
Posted by TexasTiger39
Member since Mar 2009
3671 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 1:05 pm
SIAP. I searched and got nothing.




Posted by WestlakeTiger
San Antonio, Tejas
Member since Feb 2012
9439 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 1:11 pm to
here come the master race clowns.


:herewego:
Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
30922 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 1:17 pm to
1) been posted at least twice already
2) chart is bogus... look at the recommendation for video card (hd7870) and vRAM (3GB). someone should tell these fine folks that AMD does not produce a hd7870 with 3 GB of vRAM.
Posted by brucevilanch
Fort Worth, Tejas
Member since May 2011
24333 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 1:23 pm to
In!
Posted by Mr Gardoki
AL
Member since Apr 2010
27652 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 1:41 pm to
Nb4bruce... Damn!
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 1:44 pm to
bs.
Posted by TexasTiger39
Member since Mar 2009
3671 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 1:55 pm to
by "these folks" you mean the developers of BF4?

I agree that the chart may be slightly contradictory, but it is definitely from Dice. See the BF twitter...
This post was edited on 9/10/13 at 1:59 pm
Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
30922 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

by "these folks" you mean the developers of BF4?

i mean whoever put it out didnt do even the slightest bit of proofing. go find me a HD7870 with 3GB of vRAM.
if you are going to put out the "official" requirements for a game, at least get them right.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 2:51 pm to
I think they can get a pass here. For one, there are 660s out there with 3GB vram (not that I'd recommend buying one now).

The 7870 has a 33% wider memory bus than the 660, so the devs maybe speculated that the memory usage would be similar between a 2GB 7870 and a 3GB 660. The 7870 also has a third more shading units, a third more floating point operations per second, and a third more render output processors (which affects reading and writing to vram). I know it's still an apples and oranges comparison with two different architectures, but it still makes a little bit of sense.

Recommended settings are typically more general. It's the minimum requirements that have to be specific, since they determine whether or not you can even run the game whatsoever. I kind of interpret it as saying "7870 would be pretty good, but something with more vram would be better." or "The 660 and 7870 are recommended, but if you go with a better card, choose one with 3GB+ vram."

Basically, they compared one of the lowest performing 3GB cards available to its equivalent performing competitor, as the recommended performance baseline. Stepping up from either of those cards, a 3GB card is recommended.

What I really want to know are the technical details. What element of the game/settings will take advantage of the extra vram? And at what resolution? That's important. Wish they would've indicated that.

I'll be curious to see how a 7950 performs vs. a 760. Or better yet, how well a 4GB 770 will perform over a 2GB 770 in this game. That will be a pretty good indicator on whether or not the vram recommendation is bullshite.
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

Basically, they compared one of the lowest performing 3GB cards available to its equivalent performing competitor, as the recommended performance baseline. Stepping up from either of those cards, a 3GB card is recommended. What I really want to know are the technical details. What element of the game/settings will take advantage of the extra vram? And at what resolution? That's important. Wish they would've indicated that. I'll be curious to see how a 7950 performs vs. a 760. Or better yet, how well a 4GB 770 will perform over a 2GB 770 in this game. That will be a pretty good indicator on whether or not the vram recommendation is bullshite.


great points.
Posted by brucevilanch
Fort Worth, Tejas
Member since May 2011
24333 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 2:55 pm to
You are a wizard.
Posted by LewDawg
Member since May 2009
75242 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 3:05 pm to
I'll be at Ultra if you need me
Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
30922 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

I think they can get a pass here.

they put out a buggy chart that required you to present a white paper to explain. i think you are far more lenient than i am
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 3:36 pm to
lol, good point. They probably expect most people to look at the requirements and say "yes, master."
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram