Started By
Message
locked post

How is LSU's defense now considered bad?

Posted on 9/10/13 at 12:31 pm
Posted by LSUtillidie311
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2013
140 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 12:31 pm
gave up 20 points to TCU, 7 was when drive started on the LSU 5. And 17 to UAB after going up 28-0. This doesn't seem bad to me. They look just as good as they always have.
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31897 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 12:32 pm to
It's not?
Posted by TigerFanNKaty
texas
Member since Sep 2008
10232 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 12:33 pm to
Giving up the edge and up the gut a little to much for my comfort at this point.
Posted by LsuTool
Member since Oct 2009
34844 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 12:34 pm to
they've had some issues, but we are still sorting things out.
Posted by LSUChicageaux
Member since Aug 2004
8254 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 12:34 pm to
Chicken, is there some kind of work/poster release program or something?

I haven't been to the Rant in awhile, but I think you're doing good things for these people.

Don Henley said the heart of the matter is forgiveness. Thank you, Chicken.
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43077 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 12:35 pm to
Not bad, but certainly not what we're used to seeing. Dont live in denail, these guys need experience.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58551 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 12:35 pm to
They're not.

The run defense numbers do concern me a little. I trust they will get better.
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33793 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 12:36 pm to
Idiots finding crap to complain about.

Anyone can see that this D is young and inexperienced. That's different from being a bad D. As the weeks go on, they'll look at tape and they will improve. This D is clearly talented and has to find ways to harness that talent.
This post was edited on 9/10/13 at 12:38 pm
Posted by SpeckledTiger
Denham Springs
Member since Jul 2010
1477 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

Giving up the edge a little to much for my comfort at this point.



This. Our DE are either out of position or they are much slower than what we are used to seeing out of our ends.
Posted by TigerFanNKaty
texas
Member since Sep 2008
10232 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 12:39 pm to
They don't look slow just crashing down to hard and not fighting to keep containment.
Posted by LSUtillidie311
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2013
140 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 12:52 pm to
I know they aren't bad but it seems liek everyone is saying things like "they aren't like they used to be". Its not like they have never had concerns on defense in the past 5 years
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20314 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 12:54 pm to
The defense is not nearly as imposing as it has been. Traditionally, LSU's defense is faster than the opponent's offense.

This is not the case this year, as both TCU and UAB had quite a bit of success running outside the tackles. In addition, Mills getting toasted deep wasn't a one-time event; there have been several times where WRs are running free but the QB just doesn't see them. A more accomplished offense has a chance to put some serious points on us.

It's my hope that most of the issues are from being inexperienced, and will resolve over the course of the season. That said, from what I've seen, I'm not sure putting 30 points on UGA or A&M will be enough. For that matter, the scheme Auburn runs might give us fits too.
Posted by i drink the kool aid
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2013
169 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 12:55 pm to
I have seen some bad angles taken and some missed tackles. I still believe this is a championship defense, and all we are doing is trying to find the right combination of players to put on the field. Chavis will get it done.
Posted by The312
I Live in The Three One Two
Member since Aug 2008
6967 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

The defense is not nearly as imposing as it has been. Traditionally, LSU's defense is faster than the opponent's offense.

This is not the case this year, as both TCU and UAB had quite a bit of success running outside the tackles. In addition, Mills getting toasted deep wasn't a one-time event; there have been several times where WRs are running free but the QB just doesn't see them. A more accomplished offense has a chance to put some serious points on us.

It's my hope that most of the issues are from being inexperienced, and will resolve over the course of the season. That said, from what I've seen, I'm not sure putting 30 points on UGA or A&M will be enough. For that matter, the scheme Auburn runs might give us fits too.


I generally agree with this assessment. If we are going to win the SEC, the run defense in particular has to improve.
Posted by clamdip
Rocky Mountain High
Member since Sep 2004
17872 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 12:58 pm to
bad as in the Michael Jackson Way.
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16716 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 1:12 pm to
recall a 2nd or 3rd and 1 or 2 against TCU. The entire LSU defense (line of scrimmage) was literally pushed back about 3 yards on a play up the middle. Zero penetration. Not used to seeing that from a Chavis defense, so im a little concerned, but im not about to sound the alarms unless we start giving up 24+ ppg.

thought: SEC OL are prolly bigger/better.
This post was edited on 9/10/13 at 1:13 pm
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20314 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

recall a 2nd or 3rd and 1 or 2 against TCU. The entire LSU defense (line of scrimmage) was literally pushed back about 3 yards on a play up the middle. Zero penetration. Not used to seeing that from a Chavis defense, so im a little concerned, but im not about to sound the alarms unless we start giving up 24+ ppg.

thought: SEC OL are prolly bigger/better.
the concern is, TCU did exceed that point total. Yeah, I know, kick return (nullified by kicking it out of the endzone), and gift possesion inside the 10; but still- that was with Pachall playing the 1st half. If Boykin plays the whole game, they might have gotten a couple drives more.

UAB could have gotten there too, considering we held them on downs (a likely sure 3), and they were about 5 yds out from getting the FG that Beckham ran back.

You gotta think UGA, A&M, and Ole Miss have more offensive talent than we've faced thus far; the one play Auburn runs well is killing us so far; and let's not think Alabama fell off a cliff after "only" winning 35-10 in their opener. For that matter, Arkansas will be a bowl team this year, now that they have a coach again.

We COULD outscore all of them, but 20 pts isn't the magic "winner" line it was in the past. We'll probably need 40's to beat UGA and A&M.
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33793 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

The defense is not nearly as imposing as it has been. Traditionally, LSU's defense is faster than the opponent's offense.



They still are as fast as ever. From what I've seen they've just been tackling badly and taking poor angles. Physically this D can still stand up to anyone.
Posted by BeauxSox
Winter Garden, FL
Member since Feb 2007
1553 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 1:32 pm to
Its not that most consider it bad, its just that we are not use to seeing our DE give up the edges, poor angles, and poor tackling.

All of which are fixable with experience, scheme, and coaching.
Posted by Alatgr
Mobeezy, Alabizzle
Member since Sep 2005
17660 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

gave up 20 points to TCU, 7 was when drive started on the LSU 5


Actually, they only gave up 13 if you're not counting the drive that started at the LSU 5.

Special teams gave up 7 on a kick return.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram