- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will the vaunted TCU run D hold up against the LSU rushing attack?
Posted on 8/19/13 at 5:08 pm to beauchristopher
Posted on 8/19/13 at 5:08 pm to beauchristopher
Collins + Alexander + Copeland = virtually unstoppable.
Knowing this left side is there, cc will try others things. Then run to the left side when he NEEDS something.
Right at 200 for the game
Knowing this left side is there, cc will try others things. Then run to the left side when he NEEDS something.
Right at 200 for the game
0
Posted on 8/19/13 at 5:13 pm to Bleeding purple
quote:
Total yards in a game does not always equal a W
no doubt, but total yards is the way to a rantards heart.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 5:27 pm to BigEdLSU
If it plays out the way we expect, I see a slow start to the run game and a close game maybe up to halftime, but then TCU begins to wear down and if LSU gets up two touchdowns, the running game will take over. 250 yards if this happens. Less if we get behind early and have to pass to catch up, which will be possible this year. And our defense will be better than TCU fans think it will be.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 5:29 pm to BigEdLSU
...ok . y not : 205 rushing
: 241 passing
: 241 passing
Posted on 8/19/13 at 5:54 pm to BigEdLSU
We'll hit them deep with the pass and open them up. LSU gets 175 on the ground.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 6:22 pm to BigEdLSU
If LSU's air attack is successful in the first half... I see 300 yards on the ground.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 6:28 pm to LSUVAFAN
What running team has the horny frogs played
in the last 4 years ?
in the last 4 years ?
Posted on 8/19/13 at 6:30 pm to BigEdLSU
We will run for 200, but that won't be the difference In the game. It will be whether we can use our TE's as outlets when protection breaks down or as receivers. Also, our passing game will have to be for more than 200 yds to win the game.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 8:58 pm to tcujsauce
quote:
I think the game is going to come down to whether or not our secondary is as good as everyone is saying it is.
Your secondary is not going to cover our receivers if your pass rush isn't excellent. Better hope your uglies get the job done.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 9:02 pm to Penrod
8 in the box for tcu.....gonna get burnt early by beckham. Landry will be guarded by a nickel or lb....not a good idea.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 9:07 pm to easy money
quote:
Posted by Message easy money Will the vaunted TCU run D hold up against the LSU rushing attack? 8 in the box for tcu.....gonna get burnt early by beckham. Landry will be guarded by a nickel or lb....not a good idea.
Obviously this is pretty much the game plan LSU has always wanted. Have the ground and pound and a vertical play action game to compliment it. Basically an Alabama offense. Soon though I think CLM can't help but implement the option with Jennings/Brazil(nasty). The question is, can the TCU D play one on one against LSU wide outs. If TCU can play D and slow down the run game, they have a chance.
That being said, I think LSU pulls away late in the third.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 9:41 pm to JJ27
I remember years ago when Tulane would get our left overs and then give us hell with those players that we didn't want. There is a lot of motivation for guys that have been overlooked and taken lightly. I hope our players aren't as overconfident as some of our cocky fans, that is a recipe for failure.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 10:15 pm to TigerCliff777
Well they played Air Force for 3 of those years. But I know that's not what you meant.
So I'll go 2010 Wisconsin. The 4-2-5 did just fine against a rather large O-line, John Clay, and Montee Ball. In fact, it was an o-line with 4 of the 5 still on active NFL rosters. Gabe Carimi, John Moffitt, Peter Konz, Kevin Zeitler, and Josh Oglesby is a top 10 type o-line in the last 5 years (easily).
The players are different, but the scheme is the same and it is clearly capable of bringing a downhill, run-heavy attack to a halt.
I would be shocked if Mett's arm isn't the deciding factor in this one.
So I'll go 2010 Wisconsin. The 4-2-5 did just fine against a rather large O-line, John Clay, and Montee Ball. In fact, it was an o-line with 4 of the 5 still on active NFL rosters. Gabe Carimi, John Moffitt, Peter Konz, Kevin Zeitler, and Josh Oglesby is a top 10 type o-line in the last 5 years (easily).
The players are different, but the scheme is the same and it is clearly capable of bringing a downhill, run-heavy attack to a halt.
I would be shocked if Mett's arm isn't the deciding factor in this one.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 10:37 pm to GeauxGus
We're going to curb stomp TCU.
It won't be pretty
I'd say 38-14
It won't be pretty
I'd say 38-14
Posted on 8/19/13 at 10:44 pm to The Future
This threads funny
Posted on 8/19/13 at 10:44 pm to YipSkiddlyDooo
quote:
So I'll go 2010 Wisconsin. The 4-2-5 did just fine against a rather large O-line, John Clay, and Montee Ball. In fact, it was an o-line with 4 of the 5 still on active NFL rosters. Gabe Carimi, John Moffitt, Peter Konz, Kevin Zeitler, and Josh Oglesby is a top 10 type o-line in the last 5 years (easily).
The players are different, but the scheme is the same and it is clearly capable of bringing a downhill, run-heavy attack to a halt.
You realize Wisconsin ran for over 220 yards right?
Posted on 8/19/13 at 11:06 pm to MOT
quote:
You realize Wisconsin ran for over 220 yards right?
You realize Wisconsin lost right? And held below their season avg? And converted less than 50% of their 3rd downs?
Maybe "halt" was the wrong word. But they've played and beaten a team who tried to run the ball 42 times in a game where the offense had 63 possessions...
Posted on 8/19/13 at 11:13 pm to YipSkiddlyDooo
quote:
I would be shocked if Mett's arm isn't the deciding factor in this one.
LSU's passing game will have to be on or the game will be closer than many anticipate.
Posted on 8/19/13 at 11:16 pm to RogerTheShrubber
We are going to eat them up with our new TE Scheme. Even if his arm is mediocre we still are going to open up the lanes with the dink passes
Posted on 8/19/13 at 11:22 pm to YipSkiddlyDooo
quote:
Maybe "halt" was the wrong word
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News