Started By
Message

re: Planned freshwater diversions will doom LA salt fishing

Posted on 3/29/13 at 10:35 am to
Posted by Woody
Member since Nov 2004
2452 posts
Posted on 3/29/13 at 10:35 am to
quote:

But if Cubit's Gap is in degradation phase, not growing, but subsiding after 150 years, won't formations built by diversions also have a short life?


150 years is a pretty damn strong design life. What do you suppose is the design life of a wetland created by dredging?
Posted by diplip
the Mars Hotel
Member since Jan 2011
897 posts
Posted on 3/29/13 at 10:36 am to
Define short lived...

And no, it wont last forever, nobody has ever said it would. Land created higher up in the system will have a longer life due to lower subsidence, and less wave erosion.
Posted by man in the stadium
Member since Aug 2006
1399 posts
Posted on 3/29/13 at 10:48 am to
What the scientific community is saying is that diversions can build vast sub deltas that last for 150 or so years or more. Will there have to be adaptive management and new diversions/channels/dredging once the planned diversions build land? Absolutely!! We argue that a 200 million dollar diversion building or maintaining an entire sub delta for 150+ yrs is far more cost effective than dredging to creat land at 45-65 thousand dollars an acre (actual current pricing). Do the math. We only have limited dollars so we must build the most land for the least amount of dollars, and dredging by itself does not get the most bang for your buck.

Simple as that. I still have yet to hear the dredging=magic bullet crowd explian how they plan to overcome the dollars and cents facts that we don't have enough money to dredge it all. Nungesser and pj Hahn will spout off about electric dredge development and economies of scale if we had a lot more dredges that were US flagged, the jones act, blah blah blah...it simply isn't living in the current reality, and neither are any of the rod n reel folk.
Posted by JasonL79
Member since Jan 2010
6397 posts
Posted on 3/29/13 at 10:48 am to
Yes I am.
Posted by man in the stadium
Member since Aug 2006
1399 posts
Posted on 3/29/13 at 10:55 am to
Jason79, I think it is pretty cool your family owns a lot of the land and cattle down in the balize delta. What do y'all do with the cattle when storms come?

Do y'all also own the land the camps just north and south of Pass a Loutre near Chenier Pass are on? I've been supremely jealous of those places forever.
Posted by diplip
the Mars Hotel
Member since Jan 2011
897 posts
Posted on 3/29/13 at 10:57 am to
Cool. I know him from running field trips down in the delta. He operates an airboat for us or runs us down south pass... whatever we need. Really great guy.

He told me that he has never left the delta for a storm! Ties his skiff up in the willows and rides it out! He may not do that anymore... but damn, that is amazing.
Posted by diplip
the Mars Hotel
Member since Jan 2011
897 posts
Posted on 3/29/13 at 11:02 am to
quote:

What do y'all do with the cattle when storms come


Pretty sure they just let them ride it out, then round up what they can after the storm. Cows can inflate their stomaches and float pretty effortlessly.

I think they found some of Mr Earls cows like 20 miles out in the gulf after Katrina...

Jason can correct me if i am wrong...
Posted by JasonL79
Member since Jan 2010
6397 posts
Posted on 3/29/13 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Pretty sure they just let them ride it out, then round up what they can after the storm. Cows can inflate their stomaches and float pretty effortlessly. I think they found some of Mr Earls cows like 20 miles out in the gulf after Katrina... Jason can correct me if i am wrong...


Nope you are correct. They just let them ride it out. Not enough time to get them out when a hurricane is coming for you. For the most part, they don't lose much except for really large storms. I think he lost like 1,000+ head of cattle for Katrina. Most storms very few die. It takes a huge surge to get them. Some storms they have found their branded cows 10+ miles north up the river (from 2nd spillway area in southwest pass to pilottown). Crazy they were able to survive in the water that far.
Posted by JasonL79
Member since Jan 2010
6397 posts
Posted on 3/29/13 at 11:18 am to
quote:

Cool. I know him from running field trips down in the delta. He operates an airboat for us or runs us down south pass... whatever we need. Really great guy.


Yep that's him. He knows his stuff about down there.

quote:

He told me that he has never left the delta for a storm! Ties his skiff up in the willows and rides it out! He may not do that anymore... but damn, that is amazing


He's right. He has never left down there. He drives his cattle barge (like 70+ ft big barge with engine on it for hauling his cattle up and down the river) into a canal in grand pass near Venice.
Posted by man in the stadium
Member since Aug 2006
1399 posts
Posted on 3/29/13 at 11:19 am to
Where you at "Deege"??? On the radio possibly?
Posted by faxis
La.
Member since Oct 2007
7773 posts
Posted on 3/29/13 at 11:24 am to
LA Salt fishing should be the last priority in this equation. The fish will just move out further as the marsh rebuilds. If we don't do something to rebuild the marsh, the damage is going to be irreparable and fishing will be irrelevant. Sorry you'll have to drive an extra half hour. That's not a lot to ask.
Posted by Fishhead
Elmendorf, TX
Member since Jan 2008
12172 posts
Posted on 3/29/13 at 11:24 am to
Haha, 70-30 at the moment in favor of the plan
Posted by diplip
the Mars Hotel
Member since Jan 2011
897 posts
Posted on 3/29/13 at 12:55 pm to
Wow. That interview was completely pointless.
Posted by Deege
Member since Dec 2007
843 posts
Posted on 3/31/13 at 7:27 am to
Hope and Change?

The Master Plan more like Change and Hope.
Posted by Fishhead
Elmendorf, TX
Member since Jan 2008
12172 posts
Posted on 3/31/13 at 8:42 am to
LINK /

Feel free to join the discussion here, Deege (and all others)
Posted by man in the stadium
Member since Aug 2006
1399 posts
Posted on 3/31/13 at 8:41 pm to
so Mike/Ricks/Deege,

you come in here trying to falsely represent yourself as a neutral, questioning citizen, but in the end, we see what you are. you ask slanted questions, refuse to do any reading on topics or consider answers provided by those who know and care, even manage to get on wwl only to have the opinion poll be in favor 3 to 1 for diversions, and have now resorted to garbage name calling of the master plan when you have been exposed. your amateur hour is up.
Posted by eng08
Member since Jan 2013
5997 posts
Posted on 3/31/13 at 9:28 pm to
Deege, I want to point out a slight fact about your comment regarding Atchafalaya River and MS river sediment loads.

The Atchafalaya gets 40% of the water from of the MS River so it will always have a lower sediment load than the MS river.

Look up Old River Control structure, new river control structure, 73 flood.

I have a issue with the 40/60 flow split law by the corps but that's for another day to discuss.
Posted by Hammertime
Will trade dowsing rod for titties
Member since Jan 2012
43030 posts
Posted on 3/31/13 at 10:10 pm to
Fox 8 in New Orleans just did a 4 minute piece on West Bay and how the dredging is working just as planned. Might try to look it up on the internet if you want to see it
Posted by Deege
Member since Dec 2007
843 posts
Posted on 3/31/13 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

The Atchafalaya gets 40% of the water from of the MS River so it will always have a lower sediment load than the MS river.


Eng,

Jester jumped to ridicule me for my statement too. I was speaking to concentrations in a sample, not overall volume.


I am no geologist and don't have specifics, but my first google shot comes up with this:

A satellite image shows the concentration of suspended sediment (ssc) in 2011 floodwaters is greater at the mouth of the Atchafalaya River than at the birdsfoot delta of the Mississippi River. Circles show deposits of sediment in the Atchafalaya Delta area are greater than in the birdsfoot delta. Source: NASA MODIS Aqua satellite data, calibrated with field data. b: Sediment accumulated in greater amounts and over a wider area in the Atchafalaya Delta area. There was significant accumulation in the immediate area of the Mississippi's Southwest Pass, and little to no deposition between the two deltas.
U.S. Geological Survey, Nature Geosicence

LINK


S'plain that
Posted by eng08
Member since Jan 2013
5997 posts
Posted on 3/31/13 at 10:47 pm to
I am not trying to ridicule you, I want you to read and investigate it as much as possible.

The first two paragraphs of the linked article says it all, better job at building land, nothing about the potential of it through diversions.

Average depth at or near Achtafalaya River delta is what a -1 or 2, it's flooding onto a shallow bay that's like 15 feet deep.

The Mississippi is channeled with rocks and levees pushing majority of the sediment off the continental shelf where it does not form land.

The entire goal of the sediment diversions is to capture the sediment before it exits the system (river and marsh/estuaries/bays are a system in my mind). Then nature can take its course and distribute the sediment which is a much more cost effective idea than dredging alone.

There is no accumulation between the 2 deltas because there is almost no water/sediment flow between the two. I am not counting lafourche freshwater pumps and Davis pond. They are saltwater intrusion devices not sediment transport devices.

Try reading the USACE coastal engineering manual, there are some chapters in there that help explain some history and different processes. Skip through it, use the index, it's like 5k pages.
first pageprev pagePage 16 of 19Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram