Started By
Message
locked post

Marshall Faulk: I'll never get over being cheated out of a Super Bowl

Posted on 1/31/13 at 3:08 am
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33919 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 3:08 am
quote:

"They misunderstand," Faulk corrected. "Am I over the loss? Yeah, I'm over the loss. But I'll never be over being cheated out of the Super Bowl. That's a different story. I can understand losing a Super Bowl, that's fine . . . But how things happened and what took place. Obviously, the commissioner gets to handle things how he wants to handle them but if they wanted us to shut up about what happened, show us the tapes. Don't burn 'em."

"I understand Bill (Belichick) is a great coach," said Faulk. "But No. 13 (Kurt Warner) will tell you. Mike Martz will tell you. We had some plays in the red zone that we hadn't ran. I think we got to fourth down -- we ran three plays that we hadn't ran, that Mike drew up for that game -- Bill's a helluva coach . . . we hadn't ran them the whole year (and the Patriots were ready for them)."

"I know, in that game, in the red zone, the plays we ran, most of them we hadn't ran most of those plays that year," Faulk noted. "And a couple of plays on third down that we walked through also . . . Any time that I was offset, I was always stationary. And we had creating motioning in the backfield at the same depth on the other side of the field. And they created a check for it. It's just little things like that. It's either the best coaching in the world when you come up with situations that you had never seen before. Or you'd seen it and knew what to do."



LINK
Posted by saintsfan92612
Taiwan
Member since Oct 2008
28842 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 3:11 am to
If Marshall Faulk got 10 more carries, the Rams win the game. Spygate or not, Martz blew it.
Posted by Zantrix
Parts Unknown
Member since Nov 2009
7940 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 5:41 am to
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
70761 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 5:44 am to
I would feel worse for him had he not won a Super Bowl 2 years prior to this.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 5:44 am to
the last part is interesting, but I doubt it had much of an impact on the game if at all
Posted by Mr Gardoki
AL
Member since Apr 2010
27652 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 6:00 am to
I think it makes a difference, especially in a close game like that. however I have no reason to believe that other teams haven't done the same thing over the years.
Posted by texastiger38
Member since Sep 2007
25082 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 6:06 am to
Maybe they shouldn't have turned the ball over 3 times and they would have won.

It's not like the Pats defense was super effective, they gave up over 400 yards that game.
Posted by Interception
Member since Nov 2008
11089 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 7:05 am to
Spygate >>>>> Bounty Program

Spying on a team during practices Super Bowl week? That's as bad as it gets in my mind
Posted by texastiger38
Member since Sep 2007
25082 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 7:11 am to
quote:

Spying on a team during practices Super Bowl week?


There was no evidence of that, the video assistant Matt Walsh, said they were at the SB to set up cameras for NE's walkthrough, but never filmed any of the Rams activities during the practice, and wasn't asked to film any of the practice.
Posted by Algerian
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
646 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 7:21 am to
I thought it was established that they videotaped teams for a period of time. But now I'm to believe that the biggest game of the year they stopped? Why? This thing has stunk for awhile especially after the tapes were burned. And FWIW I hated those Rams teams so I'm glad they got beat.
Posted by brewhan davey
Audubon Place
Member since Sep 2010
32775 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 7:28 am to
quote:

Spygate >>>>> Bounty Program

Spying on a team during practices Super Bowl week? That's as bad as it gets in my mind


P-fication of America

ETA: not directed at you
This post was edited on 1/31/13 at 7:29 am
Posted by Mr Gardoki
AL
Member since Apr 2010
27652 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 7:52 am to
quote:

There was no evidence of that

Since when does that matter?
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
29362 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 8:00 am to
quote:

There was no evidence of that, the video assistant Matt Walsh, said they were at the SB to set up cameras for NE's walkthrough, but never filmed any of the Rams activities during the practice, and wasn't asked to film any of the practice.

This is a more compelling circumstantial amount of evidence than the Saints placing bounties on players and actually trying to injure someone. Look at the results on the field.
Posted by beaverfever
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2008
32643 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 8:02 am to
Yeah I never understood why the spygate thing wasn't a wayyyy bigger deal. Belichick probably barely remembers it these days.
Posted by TotesMcGotes
New York, New York
Member since Mar 2009
27871 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 8:02 am to
quote:

Maybe they shouldn't have turned the ball over 3 times and they would have won.

It's not like the Pats defense was super effective, they gave up over 400 yards that game.

In a game where they're claiming the defense knew what they were going to do?
Posted by JohnZeroQ
Pelicans of Lafourche
Member since Jan 2012
8513 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 8:03 am to
If they weren't called the Patriots and had red, white, and blue colors do they get into trouble?

Kidding aside, its funny how the whole Spygate thing was quickly washed away and never talked about.
This post was edited on 1/31/13 at 8:05 am
Posted by TotesMcGotes
New York, New York
Member since Mar 2009
27871 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 8:04 am to
quote:

There was no evidence of that, the video assistant Matt Walsh, said they were at the SB to set up cameras for NE's walkthrough, but never filmed any of the Rams activities during the practice, and wasn't asked to film any of the practice.

Oh. Well then case closed.
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
29148 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 8:17 am to
Cliff's Notes: Belichick cheats.


That's as Germans as it gets.


ETA: and not a single frick was given by the NFL
This post was edited on 1/31/13 at 8:19 am
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110626 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 8:20 am to
quote:

"I know, in that game, in the red zone, the plays we ran, most of them we hadn't ran most of those plays that year," Faulk noted. "And a couple of plays on third down that we walked through also . . . Any time that I was offset, I was always stationary. And we had creating motioning in the backfield at the same depth on the other side of the field. And they created a check for it. It's just little things like that. It's either the best coaching in the world when you come up with situations that you had never seen before. Or you'd seen it and knew what to do."
Can someone a little more football savvy than I explain what the heck this means?
Posted by texastiger38
Member since Sep 2007
25082 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 8:21 am to
quote:

Oh. Well then case closed.


Just in regards to the SB, they do have video evidence of them taping signals in other games, that were destroyed, which is odd.

I don't care either way, I'm just saying.

I don't think it's far fetched to think that a defensive minded coach anticipated that the Rams might do something different to throw off the defense. Maybe he just made a good guess?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram