Interception Providence Fan Member since Nov 2008 11089 posts
(Posted on 11/16/12 at 12:54 am)
I believe the most interesting developments was not that Petraeus knew immediately that this was a terrorist attack or that 20 reports came in saying the attack was linked to Egypt protests.
The most important development is that Susan Rices statement did not completly follow the CIA talking points. General Patraeus will testify that other intllegence finding in Susan Rices statement did NOT come from the CIA. Where she or the administration found these other sources of information are one of the primary areas of where the investigation will be focused on Friday.
Poodlebrain LSU Fan Way Right of Rex Member since Jan 2004 16069 posts Online
re: Petraeus Testimony (Posted on 11/16/12 at 4:43 am to Interception)
It can't be. Decatur has posted the definitive history of events, to include the talking points provided to Rice by the CIA. Of course Decatur never bothered to question why a State Department person would get talking points from the CIA instead of from State. Wouldn't her actual supervisors have had some concern about what she was going to say? Would they leave it up to some other agency?