Started By
Message

re: Anybody else think James Harden wont be so great as a main scorer?

Posted on 10/30/12 at 9:28 am to
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 10/30/12 at 9:28 am to
quote:

he is not happy with the move


Wrong
Posted by GeauxAggie972
Poterbin Residence
Member since Aug 2009
29428 posts
Posted on 10/30/12 at 9:38 am to
quote:

But consider this: Durant and Harden shared the floor for 1,420 minutes last season. Harden played without him for 526 minutes. He averaged 16.6 points per 40 minutes with Durant, and a whopping 34.7 points without him. His true shooting percentage was also better without Durant, jumping from .641 to .686. Harden became much more aggressive off the dribble with Durant out, with his free throw attempts leaping from five per 40 minutes to more than 13. The difference in Harden's numbers with and without Westbrook track closely to those with and without Durant.


He doesn't talk about the time where Harden was on the court without Westbrook AND Durant but I think that rarely happened to draw solid of enough numbers.

I think Harden definitely has it in him, and for those asking if there is a debate on who got the better end of the deal, I think it's closer than people want to think.

Age excluded, I would much rather have Harden even in that regard. Harden is more of a team player than Martin, which isn't saying much, and is better at creating his own shot. Also, Martin plays ZERO defense while Harden at least gives you some.

Lamb can definitely swing this to OKC's side if he pans out and reaches his potential, but that is questionable when he will be behind Martin on the bench.

Not sure of what restrictions are on the Toronto pick they got, but the Dallas one is top-20 protected, which means they likely won't see this pick for a number of years as the restrictions lessen and Dirk rides off into the sunset.

I think OKC gets the slight edge in the deal, but it's tougher than people want to account for it
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278171 posts
Posted on 10/30/12 at 10:20 am to
they aren't going to trade a rookie or rookies(who would be performing good) in order to give up that cap space. Makes zero sense
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421612 posts
Posted on 10/30/12 at 10:26 am to
unless they are told the players they're targeting won't sign with them, and then they'll have to trade for talent
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278171 posts
Posted on 10/30/12 at 10:28 am to
thats unlikely, but yea
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421612 posts
Posted on 10/30/12 at 10:32 am to
i can see it just b/c they weren't a destination option this year and had to just trade to get the talent

houston has money/space and wants to spend, they just don't seem to have players willing to go there. they're in a tough spot
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278171 posts
Posted on 10/30/12 at 10:32 am to
who have they tried to get to come there
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71968 posts
Posted on 10/30/12 at 10:33 am to
Lin
Harden
Parsons
Montejunas
Asik

Houston's starting 5?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421612 posts
Posted on 10/30/12 at 10:34 am to
i think 1-3 and 5 are set

montejunas and jones are going to battle it out. i can't claim a starter yet
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421612 posts
Posted on 10/30/12 at 10:37 am to
quote:

who have they tried to get to come there

i think they were agressive last year and only ended up with lin/asik as fallback guys

i'm about to have to go to a hearing so i'll have to go look. i know they've tried to get guys and shite just hasn't worked out (but most of those were trades). when pau gasol gets depressed b/c he may have been traded to houston, i think there's a stigma
Posted by xenythx
Member since Dec 2007
32417 posts
Posted on 10/30/12 at 11:50 am to
The Houston Rockets are racists.
Posted by Fall Creek Tiger
Spring, TX
Member since Jul 2009
1195 posts
Posted on 10/30/12 at 11:56 am to
He is a piece for the future. There is more to come from Morey. Houston still has max money to offer another FA even after they extend Harden. Look for Houston to be busy in the FA market in the upcoming year. Harden will be the #2 option once Morey's plan happens.
Posted by blurr
Member since Nov 2011
55 posts
Posted on 10/30/12 at 1:13 pm to
If players were paid for flopping ability, Harden would be a max player.
Posted by floridatigah
FL
Member since Oct 2004
10395 posts
Posted on 10/30/12 at 1:21 pm to
Besides LeBron, who was the last true number one player to change teams in FA? And what are the chances that the next one goes to Houston?

And if Harden isn't a #1 option, then there are only like 10 or 12 #1 options in the league.
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43067 posts
Posted on 10/30/12 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

Harden will be the #2 option once Morey's plan happens.
Why pay max money if the plan is to make him the #2 option
Posted by RonBurgundy
Whale's Vagina(San Diego)
Member since Oct 2005
13302 posts
Posted on 10/30/12 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

there are only like 10 or 12 #1 options in the league.


this.


Houston is going to compete for the playoffs this year...their core could lure a big name. Never forget the state income laws in Texas will always make their teams attractive.
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43067 posts
Posted on 10/30/12 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

Besides LeBron, who was the last true number one player to change teams in FA?
good question.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421612 posts
Posted on 10/30/12 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

Why pay max money if the plan is to make him the #2 option

you need 3 "max" guys to win a title right now, so i have no idea what you're talking about
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43067 posts
Posted on 10/30/12 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

you need 3 "max" guys to win a title right now, so i have no idea what you're talking about
Not necessarily. There are several teams with more than 1 max money guy who didnt even make a run. Clippers, Knicks, ....
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278171 posts
Posted on 10/30/12 at 3:23 pm to
i think he means more in terms of a guy with "max money talent" than a guy that makes "max money".

not all are created equal
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram