- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Could our problem be that we have too many playmakers on offense?
Posted on 10/9/12 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 10/9/12 at 3:32 pm
The coaches can't focus on a handful of players at a time but instead are spreading their practice time out to too many other players. Perhaps if Miles just allows Mettenberger to throw to Shepard 200 times during practice this pass offense would esplode 
19
Posted on 10/9/12 at 3:33 pm to SilverSpurs13
When did we get playmakers on offense?
Posted on 10/9/12 at 3:33 pm to SilverSpurs13
no, our problem is that our playmakers aren't making plays
Posted on 10/9/12 at 3:33 pm to SilverSpurs13
This post was edited on 10/9/12 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 10/9/12 at 3:34 pm to SilverSpurs13
we need to bench them and the offense will improve
Posted on 10/9/12 at 3:35 pm to SilverSpurs13
We have none right now actually. We have some good RB's but no dynamic "playmakers" in the true sense of the word imho fwiw tbh.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 3:35 pm to SilverSpurs13
Lol.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 3:35 pm to SilverSpurs13
Admins, we sure could save some board space by stickying an Offense Sucks Thread or a Whats wrong with the offense thread. There has to be over 100 of them.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 3:37 pm to SilverSpurs13
Watch some mid 2000s USCw games and then ask the same question.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 3:38 pm to waiting4saturday
The rant is approaching full retard.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 3:40 pm to SilverSpurs13
quote:
Could our problem be that we have too many playmakers on offense?
No, next question.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 3:45 pm to SilverSpurs13
High school recruiting stars don't make you a playmaker. We have several good running backs. None are great. Yet. We have several good recievers. None are great. We essentially don't have any true playmakers. There is nobody you can count on to go to for that 3rd down conversion when you need it (proof of that Sat). We don't have a breakout threat to bust a tackle and go 50 yards for a score. Your definition of playmaker is based on hype and playstation results.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 3:47 pm to SilverSpurs13
Let me know when you find a playmaker on O that's not listed as a RB on the depth chart
Posted on 10/9/12 at 3:48 pm to SilverSpurs13
Neither playmakers nor play designers
Posted on 10/9/12 at 3:48 pm to 7thWardTiger
And our RBs are playmakers, but its hard to make plays when the other team has 9+ in the box.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 3:49 pm to SilverSpurs13
Posted on 10/9/12 at 3:54 pm to SilverSpurs13
Are you under 25? I bet you use the word swag a lot.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 3:54 pm to SilverSpurs13
There sure has been some good entertainment here lately.
And, no. And, this "theory" has been thrown out before, and never has it been more ridiculous than now.
This post was edited on 10/9/12 at 3:55 pm
Posted on 10/9/12 at 3:56 pm to Clark W Griswold
quote:
Are you under 25? I bet you use the word swag a lot.
24. And yes I do. My girlfriend listens to Justin Bieber a lot and uses swag alot so I picked up on it.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 3:58 pm to SilverSpurs13
this has to be one of the stupidest theories
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News