Started By
Message
locked post

Impact on recruiting

Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:23 pm
Posted by Threecees
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
117 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:23 pm
I was curious as to what some of you thought about what impact the lack of freshmen play might have on potential recruits. Clearly we were looking to see what Russell Shepard could do as well as Reuben Randle but really didn't see anything on either. I was also looking to see if Brockers or Montgomery might get in the game but didn't see them. Perhaps I missed them. What really surprised me was how Miles really seemed pumped and gave every indication these guys would see the field this past weekend. I did see Josh Downs look impressive but that was really it. After observing how someone like Tennessee utilized their 5 star Freshman and how other schools don't seem as resistant to using true freshman and then watching Miles seemingly apprehensive to give them quality playing time, does anyone wonder what impact this might have down the road on our recruiting? I am not sure how I feel but thought it was worth discussing.

Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
77420 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:24 pm to
wrong board
Posted by hg
Member since Jun 2009
123626 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:25 pm to
it was one fricking game shite
Posted by outsideroach
Yaw Fricked Baw
Member since Nov 2005
8015 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:26 pm to
LSU did not have that many offensive plays in the game thanks to the defense. We also never pulled away from UW, which is prolly why the young guys didnt get in the game.

With guys like Saban, Kiffin, Meyer, Frank Wilson, and Orgeron in the SEC, you can book it they will be in the ears of recruits about not getting on the field early at LSU. I think it has some impact, but not that big of a deal to this point.
Posted by LSU Coyote
Member since Sep 2007
53390 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

lack of freshmen play


It was the 1st game.......

Development of your prospects.

Prospect - A candidate deemed likely to succeed.

Development - the act or process of developing; growth; and progress.
Posted by Sam Waterston
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
1992 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:27 pm to
Tenn really has no choice because of their lack of upper level classmen who are very good (though they aren't nonexistent), and we did only run 43 plays, hardly enough to even establish our own veterans. They will play and be integral, I imagine, fairly soon.

However, if they don't see the field soon, I do think that it would affect self-conscious recruits, but probably not ones afraid of competition. But that's just me
This post was edited on 9/8/09 at 4:28 pm
Posted by TigerEyez
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2005
640 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:27 pm to
I just wish he got RS in the game early, even if not to do anything but handoff.. I understand the late game situation thing, although if you play anyone at anypoint, with our talent you should have confidence they wont fumble, make the big mistakes that les was worried about. RS should have been on the field a few times, especially after les made it so public he would have a significant roll.

Im sure it helps for the recruits to see freshman on the field, but then again, If a recruit sees that a whole bunch of upperclassman play, they may feel there arent as many talented underclassman performing. It could work against tennessee for positions where they already have freshman playing, as recruits probably know that position is locked up for three more years. I think it all balances out.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
31157 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:29 pm to
if everything goes as planned most of the ones you named will see time this week. you have to realize how few plays we ran. and there will be no impact on recruiting.
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

wrong board


No, this stupid shite doesn't need to be on the recruiting board
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

Threecees
September 2009
3 Posts


You're either an alter or a complete fricking jackass
Posted by Purple N Gold Blood
Gods country
Member since Sep 2009
2998 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:31 pm to
if the recruit's read some of the B S that is posted on here.
it probably would hurt LSU
Posted by BabyTac
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2008
12169 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:31 pm to
I'd rather play all freshman and go 0-12 and continue to recruit well.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48315 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

I was curious as to what some of you thought about what impact the lack of freshmen play might have on potential recruits. Clearly we were looking to see what Russell Shepard could do as well as Reuben Randle but really didn't see anything on either.


I really think some LSU fans are mentally retarded.
Posted by wegotdatwood
Member since Aug 2009
17094 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:48 pm to
Impact on recruiting? No recruit picks a school based on a game, let alone a non conference one to start the season.

LSU will still remain one of the top 10 teams in recruiting year in and year out. Great in state talent, great program, and competes for the SEC/National title every year.

Posted by Sam Waterston
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
1992 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

as well as Reuben Randle but really didn't see anything


We saw him block for KW on the final drive for TD
Posted by emry123
Member since Aug 2008
939 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:51 pm to
actually his question is a good one and he does have a point. are we really known for playing freshmen and sophomores even if they have more talent than the upperclassmen above them. yes, tn and bama last year did not have a choice but to play freshmen...once they fill up with talent you won't see that many freshmen take the field. but i thought les has a reputation of playing more senior players even if they had less potential..if i were a top recruit my goal is playing time and getting to the nfl as soon as possible...would i rather sit in a program until i am a junior or start as a freshman...hmmm
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

I was curious as to what some of you thought about what impact the lack of freshmen play might have on potential recruits.


None.

Generally speaking, good teams don't find it necessary to start many freshman. If this were a primary concern for great HS players, then one could expect teams such as Vandy, Rice and Temple to have huge hauls of 5 star guys next year.
Posted by emry123
Member since Aug 2008
939 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:59 pm to
that's a good point too but i think some people have the perception maybe incorrectly that miles does not play his younger players even if they are deserving of it....this is not the first time we have heard this and i am sure this gets around and other schools probably whisper into recruits ears..
Posted by LSU Fan 90812
A man more eviler than Skeletor.
Member since Feb 2005
50655 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 5:00 pm to
holy living frick.
it was the first game.
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 9/8/09 at 5:00 pm to
should miles play a freshman over a more experienced player that is as good or better than the freshman just to help recruiting? of course not. that may hurt recruiting even more. besides, he's doing pretty good on recruiting as it is. lastly, i don't think UT has the vets we have.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram