- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Impact on recruiting
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:23 pm
I was curious as to what some of you thought about what impact the lack of freshmen play might have on potential recruits. Clearly we were looking to see what Russell Shepard could do as well as Reuben Randle but really didn't see anything on either. I was also looking to see if Brockers or Montgomery might get in the game but didn't see them. Perhaps I missed them. What really surprised me was how Miles really seemed pumped and gave every indication these guys would see the field this past weekend. I did see Josh Downs look impressive but that was really it. After observing how someone like Tennessee utilized their 5 star Freshman and how other schools don't seem as resistant to using true freshman and then watching Miles seemingly apprehensive to give them quality playing time, does anyone wonder what impact this might have down the road on our recruiting? I am not sure how I feel but thought it was worth discussing.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:25 pm to Threecees
it was one fricking game shite
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:26 pm to Threecees
LSU did not have that many offensive plays in the game thanks to the defense. We also never pulled away from UW, which is prolly why the young guys didnt get in the game.
With guys like Saban, Kiffin, Meyer, Frank Wilson, and Orgeron in the SEC, you can book it they will be in the ears of recruits about not getting on the field early at LSU. I think it has some impact, but not that big of a deal to this point.
With guys like Saban, Kiffin, Meyer, Frank Wilson, and Orgeron in the SEC, you can book it they will be in the ears of recruits about not getting on the field early at LSU. I think it has some impact, but not that big of a deal to this point.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:26 pm to Threecees
quote:
lack of freshmen play
It was the 1st game.......
Development of your prospects.
Prospect - A candidate deemed likely to succeed.
Development - the act or process of developing; growth; and progress.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:27 pm to Threecees
Tenn really has no choice because of their lack of upper level classmen who are very good (though they aren't nonexistent), and we did only run 43 plays, hardly enough to even establish our own veterans. They will play and be integral, I imagine, fairly soon.
However, if they don't see the field soon, I do think that it would affect self-conscious recruits, but probably not ones afraid of competition. But that's just me
However, if they don't see the field soon, I do think that it would affect self-conscious recruits, but probably not ones afraid of competition. But that's just me
This post was edited on 9/8/09 at 4:28 pm
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:27 pm to Threecees
I just wish he got RS in the game early, even if not to do anything but handoff.. I understand the late game situation thing, although if you play anyone at anypoint, with our talent you should have confidence they wont fumble, make the big mistakes that les was worried about. RS should have been on the field a few times, especially after les made it so public he would have a significant roll.
Im sure it helps for the recruits to see freshman on the field, but then again, If a recruit sees that a whole bunch of upperclassman play, they may feel there arent as many talented underclassman performing. It could work against tennessee for positions where they already have freshman playing, as recruits probably know that position is locked up for three more years. I think it all balances out.
Im sure it helps for the recruits to see freshman on the field, but then again, If a recruit sees that a whole bunch of upperclassman play, they may feel there arent as many talented underclassman performing. It could work against tennessee for positions where they already have freshman playing, as recruits probably know that position is locked up for three more years. I think it all balances out.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:29 pm to TigerEyez
if everything goes as planned most of the ones you named will see time this week. you have to realize how few plays we ran. and there will be no impact on recruiting.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:30 pm to josh336
quote:
wrong board
No, this stupid shite doesn't need to be on the recruiting board
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:31 pm to Threecees
quote:
Threecees
September 2009
3 Posts
You're either an alter or a complete fricking jackass
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:31 pm to LSU Coyote
if the recruit's read some of the B S that is posted on here.
it probably would hurt LSU
it probably would hurt LSU
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:31 pm to outsideroach
I'd rather play all freshman and go 0-12 and continue to recruit well.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:37 pm to Threecees
quote:
I was curious as to what some of you thought about what impact the lack of freshmen play might have on potential recruits. Clearly we were looking to see what Russell Shepard could do as well as Reuben Randle but really didn't see anything on either.
I really think some LSU fans are mentally retarded.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:48 pm to Antonio Moss
Impact on recruiting? No recruit picks a school based on a game, let alone a non conference one to start the season.
LSU will still remain one of the top 10 teams in recruiting year in and year out. Great in state talent, great program, and competes for the SEC/National title every year.
LSU will still remain one of the top 10 teams in recruiting year in and year out. Great in state talent, great program, and competes for the SEC/National title every year.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:49 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
as well as Reuben Randle but really didn't see anything
We saw him block for KW on the final drive for TD
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:51 pm to Antonio Moss
actually his question is a good one and he does have a point. are we really known for playing freshmen and sophomores even if they have more talent than the upperclassmen above them. yes, tn and bama last year did not have a choice but to play freshmen...once they fill up with talent you won't see that many freshmen take the field. but i thought les has a reputation of playing more senior players even if they had less potential..if i were a top recruit my goal is playing time and getting to the nfl as soon as possible...would i rather sit in a program until i am a junior or start as a freshman...hmmm
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:55 pm to Threecees
quote:
I was curious as to what some of you thought about what impact the lack of freshmen play might have on potential recruits.
None.
Generally speaking, good teams don't find it necessary to start many freshman. If this were a primary concern for great HS players, then one could expect teams such as Vandy, Rice and Temple to have huge hauls of 5 star guys next year.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 4:59 pm to ShortyRob
that's a good point too but i think some people have the perception maybe incorrectly that miles does not play his younger players even if they are deserving of it....this is not the first time we have heard this and i am sure this gets around and other schools probably whisper into recruits ears..
Posted on 9/8/09 at 5:00 pm to Threecees
holy living frick.
it was the first game.
it was the first game.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 5:00 pm to Threecees
should miles play a freshman over a more experienced player that is as good or better than the freshman just to help recruiting? of course not. that may hurt recruiting even more. besides, he's doing pretty good on recruiting as it is. lastly, i don't think UT has the vets we have.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News