- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Thoughts on S&W?
Posted on 12/20/16 at 3:46 pm to bapple
Posted on 12/20/16 at 3:46 pm to bapple
Here's what I don't understand, if there are advancements in powder and bullet technology, wouldn't those same advancements work in the .40 too to make it that much better? Yes, it would. I am a fan of 9mm too but the law enforcement and militaries moving to it has as much to do w/ more women in those groups needing less recoil and the higher capacity. The .40 is fine as long as the handgun is built for it (see Sig P229 not M&P), and 13+1 is plenty of ammo.
quote:
with advances in powder and bullet technology
Posted on 12/20/16 at 3:55 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:That's what fan-boys usually say when their (you fill in the blank) POS fails 10 times.
the last review I watched, the guy put 2500 rounds through it and said it jammed less than 10 times and it was because of faulty ammo, not the gun
There are plenty of choices that (statistically) won't fail 10 times in 25,000 rounds.
There are several choices that will shoot virtually any ammo you can buy.
Presuming you'd be getting a handgun for self-defense purposes, it's hard to fathom why anyone would buy an SDVE instead of paying ~$200 more and getting a top-tier, high-quality pistol.
Not saying you fit into this category, but too many people try to reinvent the proverbial wheel. Go do some research and find out how many Law Enforcement agencies issue (or allow their people to carry) an SDVE.
Then Google what % issue (or approve for duty) Glocks and M&P's. There is a reason (maybe several reasons). But reliability is at the top of the list. Some of the .mil folks seem to be on board as well.
LINK 1
LINK 2
LINK 3
Posted on 12/20/16 at 5:15 pm to dawg23
quote:
Presuming you'd be getting a handgun for self-defense purposes, it's hard to fathom why anyone would buy an SDVE instead of paying ~$200 more and getting a top-tier, high-quality pistol.
That's the thing, I'm very aware that if you were to spend $200-300 more you'd get a higher quality pistol.. my problem with that is I'm not a navy seal.. I'm not law enforcement.. none of the links you gave me shite on the SDVE either, just said that the military was switching to glock.. my gun won't ever see close to 25,000 rounds. It won't be submerged in water then expected to perform
I'll probably buy it, put 250-500 rounds through it initially to break it in, then shoot it sporadically after that.. I'm not a competition shooter and I'm not a gun collector so I really don't see the problems with the SDVE..
Posted on 12/20/16 at 5:19 pm to Mr. Hangover
With that logic go buy yourself a Hi-Point or a Lorcin.
You obviously don't have any desire for reliability. Just don't plan to use it for self defense.
FWIW, every single person I've known that's bought a SDVE has sold it and bought something else. The trigger pull is horrible and the build quality sucks. I literally had a SDVE airsoft gun that was more reliable than the real gun. I probably would have preferred the airsoft gun in a self defense situation too.
You obviously don't have any desire for reliability. Just don't plan to use it for self defense.
FWIW, every single person I've known that's bought a SDVE has sold it and bought something else. The trigger pull is horrible and the build quality sucks. I literally had a SDVE airsoft gun that was more reliable than the real gun. I probably would have preferred the airsoft gun in a self defense situation too.
This post was edited on 12/20/16 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 12/20/16 at 6:01 pm to CP3
I dno man, it can't be THAT bad
This post was edited on 12/20/16 at 6:02 pm
Posted on 12/20/16 at 6:37 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
Bapple (or anyone else), help me out!!
Let's see what we got here.
quote:
the ONLY gripe I've seen about the SDVE has been the trigger but even that is ultimately personal preference
I really cannot stress enough how much a bad trigger can completely affect the novice shooter (or even an experienced shooter) in his or her ability to put accurate rounds on target.
In my classes the two most common guns I see that I prefer students not use are snubbie revolvers (generally an 8-10 pound double action trigger) or a S&W SD/Sigma. With shot anticipation, nervousness, and just general bad form (for being new shooters) these students usually have a much harder time with the guns with crappy triggers. They focus much less on the fundamentals and instead focus on squeezing the crap out of the trigger. When I switch them to any of my own personal guns (FNS9, M&P9c with Apex trigger, M&P Core with Apex trigger, Beretta 90 two, HK VP9 :gf's gun:) they immediately see the value in a good trigger.
quote:
How do you feel about it? Is it a terrible gun?
It's not necessarily that it's terrible but at that price point (or even simply $50-$200 more dollars) there are options that bring A LOT more desirability to the table.
quote:
I like the fact that it doesn't have a thumb safety,
Almost all polymer handguns now have no thumb safety or the option to not get one so this shouldn't hinder your decision.
quote:
nd like the fact that it's 16+1 and from all accounts it performs fine with all types of ammo.
This capacity (or close to it) is also pretty standard in the 9mm double-stack polymer segment.
quote:
the last review I watched, the guy put 2500 rounds through it and said it jammed less than 10 times and it was because of faulty ammo, not the gun
Anytime I hear that the gun failed a double digit number of times and then they manufacture some excuse, I am quite skeptical. If the ammo is that crappy and causes the gun to malfunction, either try the ammo in a better gun or change ammo. When I start hearing the excuse patrol voice their opinion I immediately wonder how credible the source is.
quote:
For a novice, it can't be that bad, right?
It can be and it most likely will be.
Think of it this way - would you cut corners on a fire extinguisher, a seat belt, or a climbing harness? I consider a firearm right in that category of safety gear and I want mine to work every single time without much headache. That's the mindset I would say you should have.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 6:41 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
I dno man, it can't be THAT bad
Here's a list of guns in that same price range ($300-$400) that I would consider over the SD/Sigma:
Ruger 9E
Walther Creed
Canik TP9
Stoeger Cougar
Or anything on the used market that is trusted by law enforcement or military. Service guns are designed with a high round count in mind so I absolutely would have no reservations about buying something used. Plus if you buy something from a big player manufacturer, they will honor the factory warranty no matter how old the gun is.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 6:55 pm to Mr. Hangover
My advice to you is to listen to what people are telling you here. If your gun is not reliable, all you have left is to throw it at an assailant. Trigger pull is much more important than you realize. It will affect your accuracy more than you will know.
I had a Ruger LC9 whose trigger pull was longer than from sunrise to sunset. It was ridiculous. I ditched it and got my S&W Shield. The minute I took it out of the box I was in love. Went to the range and was as accurate as could be.
The M&P handguns are made to be reliable despite getting wet or dirty. That could be the difference in living or dying. If you are looking for self-defense, GET THE RELIABLE WEAPON. /rant
I had a Ruger LC9 whose trigger pull was longer than from sunrise to sunset. It was ridiculous. I ditched it and got my S&W Shield. The minute I took it out of the box I was in love. Went to the range and was as accurate as could be.
The M&P handguns are made to be reliable despite getting wet or dirty. That could be the difference in living or dying. If you are looking for self-defense, GET THE RELIABLE WEAPON. /rant
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:05 pm to ChenierauTigre
quote:
ChenierauTigre
I don't know if you're a recent addition to the board or what but you're on-point on a lot of points regarding handguns.
The underlying point that a trigger can make or break a gun is absolutely true. I think the OP just needs to see there are better budget options.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:11 pm to ChenierauTigre
quote:
If your gun is not reliable, all you have left is to throw it at an assailant.
Well I could throw about 90 in high school
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:12 pm to bapple
I will look into those other models bapp
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:14 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
Well I could throw about 90 in high school
That might come in handy!
quote:
I will look into those other models bapp
Smith and Wesson makes a great product but their budget model leaves a lot to be desired. They may try to update it multiple times but the reputation of that gun will always be tarnished from the original Sigma.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:40 pm to bapple
Not bad for a girl, huh?
My husband has a Springfield, and its trigger is ridiculously sensitive. I hate shooting it because you will double tap that bitch unintentionally every time. I hate that gun.
My husband has a Springfield, and its trigger is ridiculously sensitive. I hate shooting it because you will double tap that bitch unintentionally every time. I hate that gun.
This post was edited on 12/20/16 at 7:44 pm
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:46 pm to ChenierauTigre
quote:
My husband has a Springfield, and its trigger is ridiculously sensitive. I hate shooting it because you will double tap that bitch unintentionally every time. I hate that gun.
My guess would be it's a 1911 with a modified trigger. The Springfield XD's generally have modest triggers but definitely not that light.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:49 pm to ChenierauTigre
quote:
Not bad for a girl, huh?
We need Picts to make that decision.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:50 pm to bapple
That's it, 1911. Heavy as a brick (but it's pretty). He likes pretty. I am the practical one.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:55 pm to CP3
Well, I'm 61, so you probably really don't want the pics.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:55 pm to ChenierauTigre
I posted kitty pics,.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:56 pm to ChenierauTigre
I like my women like my whiskey.
Dark brown and aged
Dark brown and aged
This post was edited on 12/20/16 at 7:57 pm
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:56 pm to Ole Geauxt
Oh shite. Geaux to bed, you old fart.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News