- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Question for active CCA members
Posted on 10/6/16 at 11:32 am to byutgr
Posted on 10/6/16 at 11:32 am to byutgr
quote:
byutgr
We are not talking about the land, or the mineral rights. Only the tidally influenced water. Canals dug on private property with private funds, remain private.
If things keep going the way they are going, your grand kids and great grand kids will never fish the Louisiana marsh without permission from the land owners. If you're ok, with that, fine. Just say you're ok with it and this conversation ends.
0
Posted on 10/6/16 at 11:37 am to AlxTgr
quote:
I agree that the extreme coastal areas are a problem, but at some point inland, things become crystal clear.
Of course, but that was never part of the argument. This discussion pertains only to tidally influenced waterways. I own lots of property, some of it on rivers. I don't own the river banks, and if the river erodes away my land, I simply lose that land. Why is the marsh different? Why is it when marsh land erodes and becomes open water, the owners now own the water?
We only have two options here. Do nothing and let it all wash away. Or try and fix it. Which side of the fence are you on?
This post was edited on 10/6/16 at 11:38 am
Posted on 10/6/16 at 11:41 am to Barf
What does your second paragraph have to do with the first? I don't think anyone is in favor of doing nothing.
Posted on 10/6/16 at 11:45 am to AlxTgr
quote:
What does your second paragraph have to do with the first?
Why are you trying to force two separate paragraphs to be related? They aren't related, that is why they are in two separate paragraphs.
quote:
I don't think anyone is in favor of doing nothing.
All I see is excuses for why nothing is being done.
This post was edited on 10/6/16 at 11:48 am
Posted on 10/6/16 at 7:57 pm to Barf
I think it can't be done. Even if the legislature made something up, it would be unconstitutional. You can t deprive people of property without just compensation. So, like CCA I just don't fight that battle. Can you imagine how much it would cost the State to buy all that marshland back?
I am a kayak fisherman, and have probably trespassed all over the place, but no one ever ran me off. I just don't go on anything posted.
Wait, I did a combat launch off the side of the road in Cameron once. Came back to find the sheriff and landowner waiting for me. Apologized, and he let me slide. Spot sucked so I wouldn't have gone back anyway.
I am a kayak fisherman, and have probably trespassed all over the place, but no one ever ran me off. I just don't go on anything posted.
Wait, I did a combat launch off the side of the road in Cameron once. Came back to find the sheriff and landowner waiting for me. Apologized, and he let me slide. Spot sucked so I wouldn't have gone back anyway.
Posted on 10/6/16 at 7:59 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
Costing billions and 15 years in the courts
She-it, 50 years in the courts. Looks how long that Catahoula case took, and this is 1000x as big.
Posted on 10/6/16 at 8:59 pm to Mung
I was being conservative.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News