Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

No difference in steel shot vs lead shot

Posted on 7/28/15 at 2:37 pm
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65044 posts
Posted on 7/28/15 at 2:37 pm
Per new study of lethality. Hmmmmmm

LINK

quote:

At the end of 2014, The State of Texas completed a 2-year study to, “evaluate the effectiveness of lead vs. non-toxic shot should ammunition regulations change in the future.” As a result of its double-blind methodology, there was “virtually no difference between lead and non-toxic shot.”


Posted by SCwTiger
armpit of 'merica
Member since Aug 2014
5857 posts
Posted on 7/28/15 at 2:40 pm to
Complete bullsheet.
Posted by 34venture
Buffer Zone
Member since Mar 2010
11369 posts
Posted on 7/28/15 at 2:43 pm to
lol
Posted by demtigers73
Coastal Club
Member since Aug 2014
5528 posts
Posted on 7/28/15 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

Complete bullsheet.
Posted by mach316
Jonesboro, AR
Member since Jul 2012
4776 posts
Posted on 7/28/15 at 2:43 pm to
Now what am I gonna bitch about when my ducks fly off?
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 7/28/15 at 2:48 pm to
You shittin me baw?
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
38736 posts
Posted on 7/28/15 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

No difference in steel shot vs lead shot


Well shite. I'm going back to shooting the cheap stuff again then.
Posted by DownSouthDave
Beau, Bro, Baw
Member since Jan 2013
7377 posts
Posted on 7/28/15 at 2:52 pm to
Wouldn't they consider all the tungsten stuff non-toxic? Can't read the link due to work filter.
Posted by Teague
The Shoals, AL
Member since Aug 2007
21696 posts
Posted on 7/28/15 at 2:55 pm to
Well, they're talking about doves, so maybe. For bigger stuff, tungsten is the an$wer.
Posted by commode
North Shore
Member since Dec 2012
1144 posts
Posted on 7/28/15 at 2:56 pm to
On dove maybe it is not as big of a difference, but on ducks I would say there is large difference.
Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
24996 posts
Posted on 7/28/15 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

As a result of its double-blind methodology, there was “virtually no difference between lead and non-toxic shot.”


Non-toxic does not only include steel.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65044 posts
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

Non-toxic does not only include steel.


Y'all are some incredibly picky mother frickers. Simplicity just never an option for ya'll?
Posted by DownSouthDave
Beau, Bro, Baw
Member since Jan 2013
7377 posts
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:08 pm to
All the hevi-shots of the world are waaaayyy different than lead...bitch.

non-toxic ? steel shot
This post was edited on 7/28/15 at 3:10 pm
Posted by SouthboundTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2014
1070 posts
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

On dove maybe it is not as big of a difference, but on ducks I would say there is large difference


Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65044 posts
Posted on 7/28/15 at 3:52 pm to
I've only duck hunted and my ducks seemed to fly away less in the lead shot days. Or maybe my aim just sucks now.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram