- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/17/14 at 7:44 pm to munchman
quote:
don't want people walking down the street with AK's, unless I know they are the good guys.
I don't want anybody walking around with a loaded rifle on their back.
Posted on 1/17/14 at 7:55 pm to PeepleHeppinBidness
I wish they'd ban idiots in public.
Posted on 1/17/14 at 8:24 pm to Slickback
quote:with or without a gun
I wish they'd ban idiots in public.
They won't ban open carry. But I could see some changes in public places. I have no problem with Leo approaching me and asking me wtf am I doing on a street corner with an ar strapped to my back. I got nothing o hide so I have no problem with the questions.
I don't know all the facts but I'm pretty sure there was no open carry in any of the recent mass shootings.
Posted on 1/17/14 at 10:13 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
have a problem with open carry in most places, but in COSTCO would seem a bit ridiculous
Until some lunatic starts shooting everyone in sight at said Costco.
Posted on 1/17/14 at 10:23 pm to munchman
quote:
The real question is, "Under the new "strict scrutiny" amendment, will the state courts toss out our CCW regulations as being unconstitutional ?
What do you mean by that?
I don't want to speak for dawg, but I believe he means the high court of LA could say based on strict scrutiny, you don't need a permit to carry a weapon in LA regardless if it's concealed or not
Posted on 1/18/14 at 9:42 am to Glock17
quote:
I don't want to speak for dawg, but I believe he means the high court of LA could say based on strict scrutiny, you don't need a permit to carry a weapon in LA regardless if it's concealed or not
That statement by dawg confused me because I thought it was the individual states who decided the cc laws. I like your take on it.
Posted on 1/18/14 at 11:48 am to munchman
What about plain clothed officers or detectives. Would they be allowed to open carry because I have seen people in grocery stores open carrying and sometimes they are police officers not in uniform. They have no identification on them indicating they are law enforcement.
Posted on 1/18/14 at 3:55 pm to munchman
quote:
The real question is, "Under the new "strict scrutiny" amendment, will the state courts toss out our CCW regulations as being unconstitutional ?
quote:
What do you mean by that?
a. Louisiana has a constitution.
b. This constitution was amended by the public last year to require that all statutes pass the "strict scrutiny" test of constitutionality.
c. Several lower court (district) judges have already dismissed charges of illegal carrying of firearms by felons. (It's my understanding that in some of these cases the DA's are appealing the rulings.)
d. If the lower court rulings are upheld, the court system may well decide that if felons can carry concealed without a permit, why make law-abiding citizens apply for a permit.
e. Turning gun control over to La. judges (instead of leaving control with the La. legislature) may prove to be one of the dumbest things the voters have ever done in this state.
LINK
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News