Started By
Message

re: Don't mount dat....cook dat!!!!

Posted on 7/11/13 at 8:34 am to
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
38734 posts
Posted on 7/11/13 at 8:34 am to
You can tell it taste good, look how red the meat is...

Also, bass on the whole shell... Nice. That's how they cook them in the cartoons. All we need is for a cat to leave nothing but the spine in one bite.

This guy...

Posted by pointdog33
Member since Jan 2012
2765 posts
Posted on 7/11/13 at 8:48 am to
quote:

Uhhhh all those <2 lb bass could be the offspring of a 10 lbs bass........aww screw it, I ain't explaining how this gene and inheritance shite works.


Exactly...older fish have already passed on the genes so their genes should be inferior to the younger ones
Posted by The Last Coco
On the water
Member since Mar 2009
6840 posts
Posted on 7/11/13 at 8:59 am to
quote:

But the main issue is that you're removing the possibility of that fish passing on those genes to more fish that could potentially grow to that size in the future.


A point often overlooked in discussing trophy bass release is that many times the fish that are that size are no longer producing viable offspring. The older the fish and the more spawning seasons it goes through, the higher the chance for some sort of genetic mutation in the eggs or some cancer to develop in the reproductive system of the fish that would make the eggs sterile.

Many times, these fish are doing nothing more than taking up resources that would otherwise be distributed throughout the bass population. Especially in small ponds, catching and keeping older fish is an essential management technique for the overall health of the pond. Generally speaking, a body of water will only support a certain poundage of fish. Removing one 10# fish will free up enough resources for 10 1# fish or 2 5# fish, etc... Obviously in larger bodies of water, Toledo Bend for example, this is not so much of an issue.
Posted by thedice20
Member since May 1926
Member since Aug 2008
7550 posts
Posted on 7/11/13 at 9:00 am to
quote:

A point often overlooked in discussing trophy bass release is that many times the fish that are that size are no longer producing viable offspring. The older the fish and the more spawning seasons it goes through, the higher the chance for some sort of genetic mutation in the eggs or some cancer to develop in the reproductive system of the fish that would make the eggs sterile.

Many times, these fish are doing nothing more than taking up resources that would otherwise be distributed throughout the bass population. Especially in small ponds, catching and keeping older fish is an essential management technique for the overall health of the pond. Generally speaking, a body of water will only support a certain poundage of fish. Removing one 10# fish will free up enough resources for 10 1# fish or 2 5# fish, etc... Obviously in larger bodies of water, Toledo Bend for example, this is not so much of an issue.



Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
30538 posts
Posted on 7/11/13 at 11:26 am to
quote:

quote:
A point often overlooked in discussing trophy bass release is that many times the fish that are that size are no longer producing viable offspring. The older the fish and the more spawning seasons it goes through, the higher the chance for some sort of genetic mutation in the eggs or some cancer to develop in the reproductive system of the fish that would make the eggs sterile.

Many times, these fish are doing nothing more than taking up resources that would otherwise be distributed throughout the bass population. Especially in small ponds, catching and keeping older fish is an essential management technique for the overall health of the pond. Generally speaking, a body of water will only support a certain poundage of fish. Removing one 10# fish will free up enough resources for 10 1# fish or 2 5# fish, etc... Obviously in larger bodies of water, Toledo Bend for example, this is not so much of an issue.



Correct...just like a big buck... his genes are the same when he is 1 as when he is 5......

FWIW.. i have caught many bass over 6 lbs... have never kept one...
Posted by Bleeding purple
Athens, Texas
Member since Sep 2007
25315 posts
Posted on 7/11/13 at 1:59 pm to
Alright let me drop some of my limited knowledge in here.

The genes a bass are born with are the same ones it dies with. Consequently they are the same genes it passes along with each successful reproductive cycle.

Largemouth bass growth is not linear with age. A 5lb fish will on average be 3 yrs old where as a 10 lb fish will on average not reach that weight until 10+ yrs old. Growth rate in weight, and to a lesser extent length, decrease as the bass ages. The natural life span of largemouth is not believed to exceed 15 yrs.

Largemouth sexual maturity is more dependent on size than age and they usually spawn when they reach 10". Some southern lakes with a good supply of food can have 1 yr old fish reach 2 lbs and 14" but the average is around 1/2 lb and just under 10"

Typically a male bass with spawn with multiple females in one spring

The female largemouth bass determines the # of fertilized eggs with each mating encounter. There are certainly variances but, on average a bass makes approximately 4000 eggs per lb of body weight. So a 10 lb bass will typically have 40,000 eggs with each spawn.

Most females will spawn twice in a spring and some will spawn three times over the course of 4-8 weeks.

Male and female bass of all ages and sizes will mate together. They are not selective for big male with big female or vice versa.

Larger females tend to spawn earlier in the year and some believe they tend to spawn in the deeper more protected locations.

Larger females tend to produce eggs that when fertilized are larger and develop at a faster rate giving them a survivability advantage over other fry.

Survival of the fertilized eggs and fry are dependent on lots of factor but water clarity, temperature, and the resulting availability of phytoplankton are key.

Wide variations in the temp, especially drops below the spawn threshold from a late spring, can cause a delay in hatching from the eggs and swim up. Swim up is the stage at which the fry break free from the yolk sac and become feeding little fish essentially. The longer they lay on the bottom waiting to hatch and swim up the more like they are to get eaten. However, those fry that result from the earliest spawns are at an advantage due to a longer period of development prior to the following winter. They also reach a stage of feeding on small invertebrates and fish prior to those spawning later in the year. This change in diet drastically increases the rate of growth.






So what does all this mean?

Well that depends on your particular body of water. Where is it? What climate is it in? How much forage will it continuously support to feed your growing school of bass?

If conditions are right, in a southern body of water where late freezes and wide fluctuations in water temp are rare, larger older female fish produce exponentially more, larger, and healthier fry each spawn than their smaller counterparts. They also do this earlier giving those fry a distinct advantage at both survival and at reaching reproductive capability by the following spring.

In areas with wide fluctuations in water temp and turbid water with decreased suitable amounts of phytoplankton and eventually forage fish, few of the early spawn fry are likely to not reach maturity.

From a pure genetic standpoint, the desired genetics of large fish are constantly diluted with those of less superior mates. It would then be desirable to remove as much of the competing genetic pool as possible. There is no convenient way to identify superior genetics in a young or small fish. Any small fish caught may be the offspring of a genetically desirable fish. Thus removing small fish is a gamble that you may be removing superior genetics. However, removing a large fish is a guarantee you are removing superior genetics.




What do I do?

I try to participate in the management of a healthy fish population that produces good numbers of large fish and the chance to catch a really large fish.

So, unless a body of water is truly poor, or the fish looks unhealthy, I return large bass (larger than 5 lbs) to the water, unless that particular body of water has specific regulations requesting the removal of certain size fish.

There are plenty of small bass (and other arguably better tasting fish)out there to collect and eat.


This post was edited on 7/11/13 at 2:00 pm
Posted by Bleeding purple
Athens, Texas
Member since Sep 2007
25315 posts
Posted on 7/11/13 at 5:30 pm to
all that work wasted.
Posted by El Josey Wales
Greater Geismar
Member since Nov 2007
22710 posts
Posted on 7/11/13 at 5:32 pm to
I wish you had double posted that novel.
Posted by AboveGroundPool
the basin
Member since Aug 2010
3770 posts
Posted on 7/11/13 at 5:38 pm to
I enjoyed it, and actually read it
Posted by Bleeding purple
Athens, Texas
Member since Sep 2007
25315 posts
Posted on 7/11/13 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

I wish you had double posted


I didn't enter that thing on my phone.
Posted by ZacAttack
The Land Mass
Member since Oct 2012
6416 posts
Posted on 7/11/13 at 7:01 pm to
Damn.
Posted by TheDrunkenTigah
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
17317 posts
Posted on 7/11/13 at 7:09 pm to
I read it and appreciated it, have always been on the fence about this.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram