- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CCA tagged redfish caught!!
Posted on 7/8/14 at 9:03 am to Fifthstring
Posted on 7/8/14 at 9:03 am to Fifthstring
quote:
In my opinion they are siding with the big land owners and turning their back on weekend anglers and to some extent duck hunters.
Lol no. I did hear they are in collusion with DU on the ducks. They didn't want anybody in the marshes period unless it's to release fingerlings on private property.
On serious note, I wouldn't worry about the gates, in a few years the marsh around them will be gone and you can drive on by.
0
Posted on 7/8/14 at 9:04 am to AlxTgr
Lol once again
Proven that people don't understand land laws in Louisiana
Proven that people don't understand land laws in Louisiana
Posted on 7/8/14 at 9:10 am to CBDTigerFan
I get your argument, but I don't agree that you have the rights to the shrimp, crabs, and fish that swim in the area that my tax dollars pay to manage. If it's navigable under average low tide it can be used for recreational purposes under Riparian rights.
There are a lot of people out there that think like you do and I get that, but there is another side to the argument and the "owners" don't seem to think there is another side.
There are a lot of people out there that think like you do and I get that, but there is another side to the argument and the "owners" don't seem to think there is another side.
Posted on 7/8/14 at 9:12 am to Fifthstring
quote:
I get your argument, but I don't agree that you have the rights to the shrimp, crabs, and fish that swim in the area that my tax dollars pay to manage.
quote:No, no it cannot. Stop putting riparian and rights next to each other.
If it's navigable under average low tide it can be used for recreational purposes under Riparian rights.
quote:The statutes and reported decisions are there for you to read.
There are a lot of people out there that think like you do and I get that, but there is another side to the argument and the "owners" don't seem to think there is another side.
Posted on 7/8/14 at 9:25 am to AlxTgr
quote:
Stop putting riparian and rights next to each other.
Riparian Rights
quote:
The statutes and reported decisions are there for you to read.
Yet to find a decision on tidal marshes in Louisiana. There are a few on flood waters, but I have found none on tidal marshes.
This post was edited on 7/8/14 at 9:34 am
Posted on 7/8/14 at 9:38 am to Fifthstring
Ok so you can go poach deer on the land I can pay taxes on?
Posted on 7/8/14 at 9:45 am to Fifthstring
quote:
Riparian Rights
Did you actually read that?
quote:It makes no difference. If the waterway was navigable in 1812, you can go on and through it in your boat. If a landowner digs a canal across his marsh connecting one waterway to another or even a dead end canal, that waterway was not navigable in 1812, and you cannot go there. It's really that simple.
Yet to find a decision on tidal marshes in Louisiana. There are a few on flood waters, but I have found none on tidal marshes.
Posted on 7/8/14 at 9:47 am to CBDTigerFan
quote:
Ok so you can go poach deer on the land I can pay taxes on?
Absolutely NOT... and I'm not sure how you can read the above and come to that end.
Posted on 7/8/14 at 9:50 am to Fifthstring
Pretty sure it stemmed from this comment.
quote:I don't know anything about deer hunting, but if tax dollars are used to manage the deer population, etc., your comment can be used to say that you should be able to walk onto someone's land and shoot his deer, because your taxes go toward the managing of that deer.
I don't agree that you have the rights to the shrimp, crabs, and fish that swim in the area that my tax dollars pay to manage.
This post was edited on 7/8/14 at 9:51 am
Posted on 7/8/14 at 9:54 am to Fifthstring
quote:
Fifthstring
Why don't all of you anti land owners start your own organization for fighting this? CCA has decided to stay out of it. Get over it.
Posted on 7/8/14 at 9:57 am to AlxTgr
quote:
It makes no difference. If the waterway was navigable in 1812, you can go on and through it in your boat. If a landowner digs a canal across his marsh connecting one waterway to another or even a dead end canal, that waterway was not navigable in 1812, and you cannot go there. It's really that simple.
How about if the "canal" was just a NATURAL (not dug) little stream and through natural forces becomes navigable?
Posted on 7/8/14 at 10:03 am to Fifthstring
quote:
but I don't agree that you have the rights to the shrimp, crabs, and fish that swim in the area
quote:
Absolutely NOT... and I'm not sure how you can read the above and come to that end.
This comment here idiot
If I'm paying taxes on land that is now water you can bet your sweet arse I'm gonna be doing everything I can to keep people like you out of it just like if I had acreage to Hunt on
Posted on 7/8/14 at 10:04 am to shooter35
quote:If it was not navigable in 1812, and runs through private property, then it's just as private as the land. Again, navigable has no legal significance outside of 1812.
How about if the "canal" was just a NATURAL (not dug) little stream and through natural forces becomes navigable?
Posted on 7/8/14 at 10:05 am to CBDTigerFan
WAT is going on
Posted on 7/8/14 at 10:06 am to AlxTgr
It's only illegal if you get caught amirite
Posted on 7/8/14 at 10:07 am to Boats n Hose
Annual I don't understand La. property law thread.
Posted on 7/8/14 at 10:09 am to AlxTgr
Its really sad how ignorant people are when it comes to land laws
Posted on 7/8/14 at 10:10 am to Motorboat
I'm not anti-land owner, my family and I own hundreds of acres. I can see how I'd come off that way, but I'm not. What I'm not for are groups or individuals over-stepping their rights, and I believe there are many who are doing so in tidal marshes and using false pretence and/or beliefs to run folks off. When people call them out on it, they get chippie, defensive, threaten force, etc, etc...
Posted on 7/8/14 at 10:11 am to Fifthstring
If there was land there in 1812 it does not matter at all how much water is on it its still theirs stop trespassing and trying to justify it
Posted on 7/8/14 at 10:12 am to shooter35
quote:
If the waterway was navigable in 1812
How do landowners go about proving that bayous through their marsh were not navigable in 1812?
I stay out of marsh areas during duck season if it's posted, or if I see evidence of duck hunting activity. It's just the right thing to do, and safer. Otherwise I fish on.
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News