Started By
Message

Beretta A300 Outlander vs Remington 1100 Magnum

Posted on 3/1/16 at 9:53 pm
Posted by The Last Coco
On the water
Member since Mar 2009
6840 posts
Posted on 3/1/16 at 9:53 pm
So I'm going to be buying a sub-$800 autoloader sometime before next season and have settled on 2 options:

1. NIB Beretta A300 Outlander
2. Used Remington 1100 Magnum with Remchoke

Which would you buy and why? The 1100 would be a used/older gun but both can be had in the $700 range. I've always shot an 870 so the familiar sight lines would be nice, but at the same time the durability of a synthetic A300 isn't something to write off.

Thoughts?
This post was edited on 3/1/16 at 9:55 pm
Posted by jimjackandjose
Member since Jun 2011
6496 posts
Posted on 3/1/16 at 9:55 pm to
What are you using for
Posted by Trout Bandit
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2012
13266 posts
Posted on 3/1/16 at 10:04 pm to
A300
Posted by Rockbrc
Attic
Member since Nov 2015
7920 posts
Posted on 3/1/16 at 10:08 pm to
A 300
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66432 posts
Posted on 3/1/16 at 10:11 pm to
For what you get, A300 is best valued 3" semiauto on the market
Posted by MWP
Kingwood, TX via Monroe, LA
Member since Jul 2013
10441 posts
Posted on 3/1/16 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

Thoughts?


Holy frick, the Remington shouldn't even be in the same discussion as the Beretta. I have the A300, an Extrema, and a Super Vinci and the Outlander is what I pick up 9 times out of 10. It is a machine.
Posted by northern
Member since Jan 2014
1360 posts
Posted on 3/1/16 at 10:48 pm to
A300 hands down.

Own both. I've got a mid 90's 1100 and A300, both wood stocks. 1100 is a horse but it weighs like one too. A300 has eaten everything I've ran through it from 7/8 to 1&1/4 without flinching during my last dove hunt, it weighs less, and recoil is nothing.

FWIW the wood/blued Beretta seems less durable than the Remi. I didn't like the swing/balance of the synthetic A300 but will be buying the plastic stock and forend for next waterfowl season.
This post was edited on 3/1/16 at 11:11 pm
Posted by ChatRabbit77
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2013
5861 posts
Posted on 3/1/16 at 11:10 pm to
A300.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 3/1/16 at 11:34 pm to
If it's a well take care of older 1100 I'd get that. They are fine shotguns.

If it's a newer one with a shitty finish than get the beretta.
Posted by Manchac Man
Member since Dec 2014
1508 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 6:51 am to
I hear the A300 is the real deal.
Posted by gorillacoco
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2009
5320 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 7:16 am to
If you're gonna be dumb, you gotta be tough. That's my motto and also why I go with the 1100. When I flip a pirogue before dawn I know what gun I want to pull out of the mud to hunt with the rest of the morning.
Posted by Tiger inTampa
Tampa, FL
Member since Sep 2009
2171 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 7:19 am to
I've shot an 1100 for 20+ years with 0 problems. i won an Outlander in a raffle at a charity clay shoot last year and have shot probably 500-750 rounds through it and absolutely love it. By the way its probably a good 2-3 lbs. lighter than my 1100.

If the 1100 is in good condition I would have no problem recommending either with the price being the deciding factor.
This post was edited on 3/2/16 at 7:20 am
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 7:21 am to
Love our 1100s but they do not shoot well dirty. Have to keep them very clean in my experience.
Posted by mack the knife
EBR
Member since Oct 2012
4185 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 7:28 am to
quote:

Love our 1100s but they do not shoot well dirty. Have to keep them very clean in my experience.



+1
Posted by gorillacoco
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2009
5320 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 7:35 am to
Man that is not the experience I've had at all. My 1100 very rarely jams and I hardly clean the thing unless I dunk it. Just my 2 cents.
Posted by Homey the Clown
Member since Feb 2009
5715 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 7:37 am to
I bought an A300 recently. Used it for the last three weeks of duck season, and i love it. I wanted something that shot 3.5in but didnt want something used and didnt want to spend $1000+ so i settled for the A300, and i do not regret it. Sky blasted a few geese the last morning of the season with 3in #4, so i guess i dont really need 3.5in.
Posted by The Last Coco
On the water
Member since Mar 2009
6840 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 7:42 am to
quote:

What are you using for

Primarily duck

Sounds like the A300 is the consensus (well aside from gorillacoco, but his opinion doesn't count anyway). That's the way I was leaning and the extra weight reduction and added durability of the synthetic vs the wood stock is the tipping point I think. My guns never really get just destroyed while hunting, but the stocks get wet and I hate that my 870 stock swells.

Now I just need to go get it and start shooting!

Posted by The Last Coco
On the water
Member since Mar 2009
6840 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 7:43 am to
quote:

When I flip a pirogue before dawn I know what gun I want to pull out of the mud to hunt with the rest of the morning.

Yeah, I want to hunt with the one in the floating gun case.
Posted by gorillacoco
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2009
5320 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 7:49 am to
quote:


Yeah, I want to hunt with the one in the floating gun case.


Yeah, did you read my motto? Don't get smart with me.
Posted by The Last Coco
On the water
Member since Mar 2009
6840 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 7:54 am to
Alright, now that I'm decided on the A300, should I go with the black or is the camo worth the extra $130?

Since I hunt a wide range of habitat, I'm thinking I should go with the black. I love the mossy oak shadow blades pattern, but in some of the flooded buck brush I hunt, that yellow pattern sticks out like a sore thumb.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram