Started By
Message

re: Why don't suburbs like Central and Walker ban high density developments?

Posted on 3/6/23 at 9:53 am to
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25394 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 9:53 am to
quote:

personally, a suburb has to go "all out" like this or i have no interest. either make in nice, clean, pretty, safe, and sanitized... or don't bother.



There is no way to even come close to preserving the "small town feel' without actually being a small town unless there are some pretty tight restrictions on development.

And ultimately it's going to end up just being a more expensive suburb with a bogie main street. But I'd rather live there than in a poorly planned, overly dense suburb.

IMO Baton Rouge has sort of lacked a more controlled, better quality suburb because the city itself was more viable than places like Jackson (which has Madison) or Memphis (which has Germantown, Collierville, Arlington, and Olive Branch). You still have a lot of working/middle class people in Baton Rouge that are totally okay with paying tuition. So there wasn't as much of a need for higher quality suburbs until fairly recently. And they've just not had quite as much time to get themselves organized yet.

But yeah - sign/lighting restrictions, the curbing of multi-family rental housing/apartment complexes, and careful sewer and road infrastructure improvements just aren't really seen in Louisiana's suburbs. At least not yet.
This post was edited on 3/6/23 at 9:57 am
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32119 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 10:03 am to
The bigger, nicer suburbs around Atlanta or Memphis have restrictions on the % of homes that can be multi-family.

And a huge number of those multi family homes are condos that are marketed specifically towards older, retired people. Some have 55+ age restrictions.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32119 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 10:05 am to
quote:

Apartments are going up all over Katy Texas so unfortunately Katy is doomed



The issue is that when they are built, they are usually very good at attracting the exact type of renter they are looking for: young adults and young families that need affordable housing near their workplace.

The problem comes as they age and the apartment complex changes hands a few times. It becomes less desirable and the owner has to rely on section 8 vouchers to keep the rent coming in. Which means that the value of the multi family housing is artificially high, so it's harder for a developer to buy it, knock it down, and repurpose it.
Posted by concrete_tiger
Member since May 2020
6057 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 10:13 am to
Cities suck when it comes to handling growth.

They aren't prepared.
They fail with the response.
Developers swoop in and frick everyone.

The "rural" place we moved to 8 years ago barely resembles it any more. The city has yet to find a piece of forest that it doesn't think looks better with cookie cutter McMansions. Never mind the roads can't handle the flow, and schools are bursting at the seams...

Posted by Hu_Flung_Pu
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2013
22204 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 10:17 am to
I don’t understand the apartments in Central by shoe creek but I doubt low income is in there. I do not like the storage unit in plain sight.
Posted by BilbeauTBaggins
probably stuck in traffic
Member since May 2021
4572 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 10:22 am to
quote:

The apartments near Central Walmart have been there longer than I’ve been alive.


Central Woods? From what I've heard, they were known as "Central Hoods" for years
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
29238 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 11:00 am to
quote:

The bigger, nicer suburbs around Atlanta... have restrictions on the % of homes that can be multi-family.


What doesn't get enough push is "missing-middle" housing:


Developed right with a significant emphasis on owner-occupied, it's a great tool for development (without relying solely on stick-built cheap starter homes and apartments).
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
29238 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 11:01 am to
quote:

. It becomes less desirable and the owner has to rely on section 8 vouchers to keep the rent coming in.


I think a lot of the issues surrounding apartments could be solved if the feds dumped the Section 8 program.
Posted by HouseMom
Member since Jun 2020
1018 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 11:12 am to
quote:

It becomes less desirable and the owner has to rely on section 8 vouchers to keep the rent coming in. Which means that the value of the multi family housing is artificially high


Yes, the government providing these vouchers is absolutely inflating prices. There's no ability for the market to just do its thing.

There are also a ton of grants available for lower income first-time homeowners that will cover 100% of the down payment with zero to be paid back if they live in the home for a period of time.

These people are "buying" homes with government money.
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36710 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 11:42 am to
quote:

IMO Baton Rouge has sort of lacked a more controlled, better quality suburb because the city itself was more viable than places like Jackson (which has Madison) or Memphis (which has Germantown, Collierville, Arlington, and Olive Branch). You still have a lot of working/middle class people in Baton Rouge that are totally okay with paying tuition. So there wasn't as much of a need for higher quality suburbs until fairly recently. And they've just not had quite as much time to get themselves organized yet.



baton rouge also sucks arse to get in and out of. Going a few miles in Baton Rouge can take a half hour.

Add that the burbs are almost certainly going to come with increased flood risk and it makes sense why a "the woodlands lite" never developed in BR.

St Fransville is the most realistic option
Posted by Wabbit7
Member since Aug 2018
1134 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

I don’t understand the apartments in Central by shoe creek but I doubt low income is in there. I do not like the storage unit in plain sight


I can’t stand that storage place right there. Wish it never got approval.
Posted by 3deadtrolls
lafayette
Member since Jan 2014
5737 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 12:37 pm to

I don’t know how they are selling DSLD/Horton houses 3 feet apart for $350k plus, but somehow they are.
This post was edited on 3/27/23 at 8:21 pm
Posted by r0cky1
Member since Oct 2020
3364 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 12:38 pm to
You talk about republicans but then suggest banning developments and creating more government restrictions. Not very conservative of you…
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
53104 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 1:01 pm to
Well we all know it’s the democrats causing the problems baw
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51364 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

Demand that ALL new construction be A) big lots B) big houses C) not increase flooding to surrounding homes.


Shocking I know, but not everyone who lives in an apartment complex is a criminal.
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
48747 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 1:10 pm to
People get PTSD in this area when apartments go up near them because they have decades of evidence and dozens of examples of them starting out nice and going to shite most of the time. They are correct too in this area at least.

I can only think of a handful of apartment complexes in the BR metro that are 20+ years old that aren't crappy now.
This post was edited on 3/6/23 at 1:12 pm
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
35392 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Shocking I know, but not everyone who lives in an apartment complex is a criminal.


And not all pit bulls attack people. But you wouldn't want one next door.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51364 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

People get PTSD in this area when apartments go up near them because they have decades of evidence and dozens of examples of them starting out nice and going to shite most of the time. They are correct too in this area at least.

I can only think of a handful of apartment complexes in the BR metro that are 20+ years old that aren't crappy now.


Sounds more like a Louisiana problem than an apartment problem.

If you live in a desirable area that attracts people, then apartment complexes maintain their attractiveness.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
53104 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 1:25 pm to
Sorry you live in an apartment baw. The trailer park of the middle class
Posted by JAMAC2001
Member since Jan 2013
2764 posts
Posted on 3/6/23 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

I can only think of a handful of apartment complexes in the BR metro that are 20+ years old that aren't crappy now.


Can you share these examples? I'd be genuinely surprised.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram