Started By
Message

re: Wal-Mart security attempts to arrest perp in parking lot-gets stabbed

Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:24 pm to
Posted by Alabama Slim
2009,2011 BCS National Champions
Member since Jul 2007
9934 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:24 pm to
I don't think they're allowed to assault people during said detention.
Posted by Sampson
Chicago
Member since Mar 2012
24561 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:27 pm to
One small love tap while attempting to restrain doesn't justify attempted murder. They acted appropriately and within their legal jurisdiction.
Posted by Vlad
North AL
Member since May 2012
2605 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:28 pm to
The full nelson, belly to back suplex to face was executed to perfection...
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124048 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:30 pm to
What could this punk have possibly stolen to justify that sort of reaction. And why not just get his license and info?
Posted by Sampson
Chicago
Member since Mar 2012
24561 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:31 pm to
Impossible to determine based on when the video began. No telling what he did to provoke the force. Video guy will be key witness.
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 3:32 pm
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124048 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

Impossible to determine based on when the video began. No telling what he did to provoke the force.



Also no telling when they began using excessive force to attack him.
Which you know they did.

Those are the kind of people that become bad cops.



No offense Who Me. You know we're cool.
Posted by Who Me
Ascension
Member since Aug 2011
7090 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:32 pm to
I've only watched the video once and briefly.

Just speaking of in LA. All bets off in any other state.

Security guard, cashier, loss prevention, whatever. Have a legal authority to stop and detain shoplifters. So the detention is not what is being questioned now just the use of force.

I saw them trying to restrain the guy who was actively resisting them the shoplifter begins biting which would increase the level of force that can be justified. Then the shoplifter produces a box cutter and starts stabbing the loss prevention guys. This makes it a deadly force encounter. They could have used lethal force at that point to defend themselves and would have been justified.

Did they hit him any after he was cuffed?

All of the force used I believe can be justified however that doesn't mean Walmart will stand behind them and it doesn't mean they would not be civilly liable
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124048 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

Did they hit him any after he was cuffed?


They beat the frick out of him with malice aforethought after he was on the ground.


I'm sorry, I don't trust second string wal-mart security to be able to make those sort of judgment calls that even trained law officers seem to have trouble with.

Posted by Alabama Slim
2009,2011 BCS National Champions
Member since Jul 2007
9934 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:39 pm to
the video goes against every bit of normal loss prevention protocol that I've ever been taught. stores don't want the liability.
Posted by Sampson
Chicago
Member since Mar 2012
24561 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:39 pm to
He fricking stabbed the guy. STABBED. In the side, by vital organs, with force. He deserved everything they gave him after that.
Posted by Who Me
Ascension
Member since Aug 2011
7090 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

They beat the frick out of him with malice aforethought after he was on the ground.


You do realize that he was not yet restrained and was still actively fighting them when they were hitting him? You do realize that those strikes while brutal can be justified by the suspects decision to attack the LP employees who we assume are justified in detaining him.

I don't see a chance in hell that the guys would be charged criminally if this were to happen in Louisiana.
Posted by Who Me
Ascension
Member since Aug 2011
7090 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

the video goes against every bit of normal loss prevention protocol that I've ever been taught. stores don't want the liability
.


I agree.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124048 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:47 pm to
Maybe not charged criminally. But civilly he'll be able to sue the dog piss out of walmart.


And again, what material good could he have stolen to provoke that kind of response? Those two guys were just gung-ho about it. They had a complex.

If it were a home invasion, sure. But this was wal-mart.


The whole situation is retarded.
Posted by Who Me
Ascension
Member since Aug 2011
7090 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:58 pm to
Fr33

We are good bro but come on man.


You are blaming the LP guys instead of the thief who was the one who escalated the situation.

Yes situations like this are why Walmart doesn't want their employees trying to physically restrain suspects or follow them outside. The legal fees alone will be through the roof.
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
57462 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 4:02 pm to
Weird how he called him a "fricking monkey"
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124048 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 4:05 pm to
You don't think this whole situation could have been resolved without violence? They could have gotten the punk's info and notified the authorities.

Instead they go all cowboy and risk harm to multiple people.

And for what?

Violence isn't a good response to non-violent crime, especially for a company as profitable as wal-mart.
Posted by Who Me
Ascension
Member since Aug 2011
7090 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

You don't think this whole situation could have been resolved without violence?



Look I am not arguing that it is wise for loss prevention employees to try to physically restrain someone to take them into custody for shoplifting. I was however pointing out that is legal for them to do so.



quote:

They could have gotten the punk's info and notified the authorities.


you really think that guy was gonna stop and provide ID for them so they could call it in?

quote:

Instead they go all cowboy and risk harm to multiple people.


See my above statement. But again I think you are giving the shithead thief a pass. He is the one that should shoulder the blame for the incident. Had a bystander pulled out a gun a shot him when he was stabbing those guys it would have been a justified shoot.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36031 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 4:14 pm to
I chased a shoplifter out of my store. He pulled a knife. I told him to have a nice day.

No way I was going to have my throat slashed over a guy walking out with two quarts of motor oil in his pants.
Posted by Indfanfromcol
LSU
Member since Jan 2011
14723 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

Have a legal authority to stop and detain shoplifters



Umm, there is a difference in being detained and being arrested, which is what they did. Arrest him. They have the authority to arrest him?
Posted by Who Me
Ascension
Member since Aug 2011
7090 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

Umm, there is a difference in being detained and being arrested, which is what they did. Arrest him. They have the authority to arrest him?



Yes in Louisiana they do anyway. I posted a link a page or 2 back.
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram